亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

As the use of deep learning in high impact domains becomes ubiquitous, it is increasingly important to assess the resilience of models. One such high impact domain is that of face recognition, with real world applications involving images affected by various degradations, such as motion blur or high exposure. Moreover, images captured across different attributes, such as gender and race, can also challenge the robustness of a face recognition algorithm. While traditional summary statistics suggest that the aggregate performance of face recognition models has continued to improve, these metrics do not directly measure the robustness or fairness of the models. Visual Psychophysics Sensitivity Analysis (VPSA) [1] provides a way to pinpoint the individual causes of failure by way of introducing incremental perturbations in the data. However, perturbations may affect subgroups differently. In this paper, we propose a new fairness evaluation based on robustness in the form of a generic framework that extends VPSA. With this framework, we can analyze the ability of a model to perform fairly for different subgroups of a population affected by perturbations, and pinpoint the exact failure modes for a subgroup by measuring targeted robustness. With the increasing focus on the fairness of models, we use face recognition as an example application of our framework and propose to compactly visualize the fairness analysis of a model via AUC matrices. We analyze the performance of common face recognition models and empirically show that certain subgroups are at a disadvantage when images are perturbed, thereby uncovering trends that were not visible using the model's performance on subgroups without perturbations.

Recently, lots of algorithms have been proposed for learning a fair classifier from decentralized data. However, many theoretical and algorithmic questions remain open. First, is federated learning necessary, i.e., can we simply train locally fair classifiers and aggregate them? In this work, we first propose a new theoretical framework, with which we demonstrate that federated learning can strictly boost model fairness compared with such non-federated algorithms. We then theoretically and empirically show that the performance tradeoff of FedAvg-based fair learning algorithms is strictly worse than that of a fair classifier trained on centralized data. To bridge this gap, we propose FedFB, a private fair learning algorithm on decentralized data. The key idea is to modify the FedAvg protocol so that it can effectively mimic the centralized fair learning. Our experimental results show that FedFB significantly outperforms existing approaches, sometimes matching the performance of the centrally trained model.

Machine learning (ML) has become prominent in applications that directly affect people's quality of life, including in healthcare, justice, and finance. ML models have been found to exhibit discrimination based on sensitive attributes such as gender, race, or disability. Assessing if an ML model is free of bias remains challenging to date, and by definition has to be done with sensitive user characteristics that are subject of anti-discrimination and data protection law. Existing libraries for fairness auditing of ML models offer no mechanism to protect the privacy of the audit data. We present PrivFair, a library for privacy-preserving fairness audits of ML models. Through the use of Secure Multiparty Computation (MPC), PrivFair protects the confidentiality of the model under audit and the sensitive data used for the audit, hence it supports scenarios in which a proprietary classifier owned by a company is audited using sensitive audit data from an external investigator. We demonstrate the use of PrivFair for group fairness auditing with tabular data or image data, without requiring the investigator to disclose their data to anyone in an unencrypted manner, or the model owner to reveal their model parameters to anyone in plaintext.

Fairness has emerged as an important concern in automated decision-making in recent years, especially when these decisions affect human welfare. In this work, we study fairness in temporally extended decision-making settings, specifically those formulated as Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). Our proposed notion of fairness ensures that each state's long-term visitation frequency is at least a specified fraction. This quota-based notion of fairness is natural in many resource-allocation settings where the dynamics of a single resource being allocated is governed by an MDP and the distribution of the shared resource is captured by its state-visitation frequency. In an average-reward MDP (AMDP) setting, we formulate the problem as a bilinear saddle point program and, for a generative model, solve it using a Stochastic Mirror Descent (SMD) based algorithm. The proposed solution guarantees a simultaneous approximation on the expected average-reward and fairness requirement. We give sample complexity bounds for the proposed algorithm and validate our theoretical results with experiments on simulated data.

We argue that an imperfect criminal law procedure cannot be group-fair, if 'group fairness' involves ensuring the same chances of acquittal or convictions to all innocent defendants independently of their morally arbitrary features. We show mathematically that only a perfect procedure (involving no mistake), a non-deterministic one, or a degenerate one (everyone or no one is convicted) can guarantee group fairness, in the general case. Following a recent proposal, we adopt a definition of group fairness, requiring that individuals who are equal in merit ought to have the same statistical chances of obtaining advantages and disadvantages, in a way that is statistically independent of any of their feature that does not count as merit. We explain by mathematical argument that the only imperfect procedures offering an a-priori guarantee of fairness in relation to all non-merit trait are lotteries or degenerate ones (i.e., everyone or no one is convicted). To provide a more intuitive point of view, we exploit an adjustment of the well-known ROC space, in order to represent all possible procedures in our model by a schematic diagram. The argument seems to be equally valid for all human procedures, provided they are imperfect. This clearly includes algorithmic decision-making, including decisions based on statistical predictions, since in practice all statistical models are error prone.

We show that, for each of five datasets of increasing complexity, certain training samples are more informative of class membership than others. These samples can be identified a priori to training by analyzing their position in reduced dimensional space relative to the classes' centroids. Specifically, we demonstrate that samples nearer the classes' centroids are less informative than those that are furthest from it. For all five datasets, we show that there is no statistically significant difference between training on the entire training set and when excluding up to 2% of the data nearest to each class's centroid.

Machine learning (ML) models have been deployed for high-stakes applications. Due to class imbalance in the sensitive attribute observed in the datasets, ML models are unfair on minority subgroups identified by a sensitive attribute, such as race and sex. In-processing fairness algorithms ensure model predictions are independent of sensitive attribute. Furthermore, ML models are vulnerable to attribute inference attacks where an adversary can identify the values of sensitive attribute by exploiting their distinguishable model predictions. Despite privacy and fairness being important pillars of trustworthy ML, the privacy risk introduced by fairness algorithms with respect to attribute leakage has not been studied. We identify attribute inference attacks as an effective measure for auditing blackbox fairness algorithms to enable model builder to account for privacy and fairness in the model design. We proposed Dikaios, a privacy auditing tool for fairness algorithms for model builders which leveraged a new effective attribute inference attack that account for the class imbalance in sensitive attributes through an adaptive prediction threshold. We evaluated Dikaios to perform a privacy audit of two in-processing fairness algorithms over five datasets. We show that our attribute inference attacks with adaptive prediction threshold significantly outperform prior attacks. We highlighted the limitations of in-processing fairness algorithms to ensure indistinguishable predictions across different values of sensitive attributes. Indeed, the attribute privacy risk of these in-processing fairness schemes is highly variable according to the proportion of the sensitive attributes in the dataset. This unpredictable effect of fairness mechanisms on the attribute privacy risk is an important limitation on their utilization which has to be accounted by the model builder.

Recent years have witnessed remarkable progress towards computational fake news detection. To mitigate its negative impact, we argue that it is critical to understand what user attributes potentially cause users to share fake news. The key to this causal-inference problem is to identify confounders -- variables that cause spurious associations between treatments (e.g., user attributes) and outcome (e.g., user susceptibility). In fake news dissemination, confounders can be characterized by fake news sharing behavior that inherently relates to user attributes and online activities. Learning such user behavior is typically subject to selection bias in users who are susceptible to share news on social media. Drawing on causal inference theories, we first propose a principled approach to alleviating selection bias in fake news dissemination. We then consider the learned unbiased fake news sharing behavior as the surrogate confounder that can fully capture the causal links between user attributes and user susceptibility. We theoretically and empirically characterize the effectiveness of the proposed approach and find that it could be useful in protecting society from the perils of fake news.

Training datasets for machine learning often have some form of missingness. For example, to learn a model for deciding whom to give a loan, the available training data includes individuals who were given a loan in the past, but not those who were not. This missingness, if ignored, nullifies any fairness guarantee of the training procedure when the model is deployed. Using causal graphs, we characterize the missingness mechanisms in different real-world scenarios. We show conditions under which various distributions, used in popular fairness algorithms, can or can not be recovered from the training data. Our theoretical results imply that many of these algorithms can not guarantee fairness in practice. Modeling missingness also helps to identify correct design principles for fair algorithms. For example, in multi-stage settings where decisions are made in multiple screening rounds, we use our framework to derive the minimal distributions required to design a fair algorithm. Our proposed algorithm decentralizes the decision-making process and still achieves similar performance to the optimal algorithm that requires centralization and non-recoverable distributions.

Rankings of people and items are at the heart of selection-making, match-making, and recommender systems, ranging from employment sites to sharing economy platforms. As ranking positions influence the amount of attention the ranked subjects receive, biases in rankings can lead to unfair distribution of opportunities and resources, such as jobs or income. This paper proposes new measures and mechanisms to quantify and mitigate unfairness from a bias inherent to all rankings, namely, the position bias, which leads to disproportionately less attention being paid to low-ranked subjects. Our approach differs from recent fair ranking approaches in two important ways. First, existing works measure unfairness at the level of subject groups while our measures capture unfairness at the level of individual subjects, and as such subsume group unfairness. Second, as no single ranking can achieve individual attention fairness, we propose a novel mechanism that achieves amortized fairness, where attention accumulated across a series of rankings is proportional to accumulated relevance. We formulate the challenge of achieving amortized individual fairness subject to constraints on ranking quality as an online optimization problem and show that it can be solved as an integer linear program. Our experimental evaluation reveals that unfair attention distribution in rankings can be substantial, and demonstrates that our method can improve individual fairness while retaining high ranking quality.