{mayi_des}
A Boolean maximum constraint satisfaction problem, Max-CSP($f$), is specified by a constraint function $f:\{-1,1\}^k\to\{0,1\}$; an instance on $n$ variables is given by a list of constraints applying $f$ on a tuple of "literals" of $k$ distinct variables chosen from the $n$ variables. Chou, Golovnev, and Velusamy [CGV20] obtained explicit constants characterizing the streaming approximability of all symmetric Max-2CSPs. More recently, Chou, Golovnev, Sudan, and Velusamy [CGSV21] proved a general dichotomy theorem tightly characterizing the approximability of Boolean Max-CSPs with respect to sketching algorithms. For every $f$, they showed that there exists an optimal approximation ratio $\alpha(f)\in (0,1]$ such that for every $\epsilon>0$, Max-CSP($f$) is $(\alpha(f)-\epsilon)$-approximable by a linear sketching algorithm in $O(\log n)$ space, but any $(\alpha(f)+\epsilon)$-approximation sketching algorithm for Max-CSP($f$) requires $\Omega(\sqrt{n})$ space. In this work, we build on the [CGSV21] dichotomy theorem and give closed-form expressions for the sketching approximation ratios of multiple families of symmetric Boolean functions. The functions include $k$AND and Th$_k^{k-1}$ (the ``weight-at-least-$(k-1)$'' threshold function on $k$ variables). In particular, letting $\alpha'_k = 2^{-(k-1)} (1-k^{-2})^{(k-1)/2}$, we show that for odd $k \geq 3$, $\alpha(k$AND$ = \alpha'_k$; for even $k \geq 2$, $\alpha(k$AND$) = 2\alpha'_{k+1}$; and for even $k \geq 2$, $\alpha($Th$_k^{k-1}) = \frac{k}2\alpha'_{k-1}$. We also resolve the ratio for the ``weight-exactly-$\frac{k+1}2$'' function for odd $k \in \{3,\ldots,51\}$ as well as fifteen other functions. These closed-form expressions need not have existed just given the [CGSV21] dichotomy. For arbitrary threshold functions, we also give optimal "bias-based" approximation algorithms generalizing [CGV20] and simplifying [CGSV21].
We initiate the study of parameterized complexity of $\textsf{QMA}$ problems in terms of the number of non-Clifford gates in the problem description. We show that for the problem of parameterized quantum circuit satisfiability, there exists a classical algorithm solving the problem with a runtime scaling exponentially in the number of non-Clifford gates but only polynomially with the system size. This result follows from our main result, that for any Clifford + $t$ $T$-gate quantum circuit satisfiability problem, the search space of optimal witnesses can be reduced to a stabilizer subspace isomorphic to at most $t$ qubits (independent of the system size). Furthermore, we derive new lower bounds on the $T$-count of circuit satisfiability instances and the $T$-count of the $W$-state assuming the classical exponential time hypothesis ($\textsf{ETH}$). Lastly, we explore the parameterized complexity of the quantum non-identity check problem.
We consider universal approximations of symmetric and anti-symmetric functions, which are important for applications in quantum physics, as well as other scientific and engineering computations. We give constructive approximations with explicit bounds on the number of parameters with respect to the dimension and the target accuracy $\epsilon$. While the approximation still suffers from the curse of dimensionality, to the best of our knowledge, these are the first results in the literature with explicit error bounds for functions with symmetry or anti-symmetry constraints.
Consider a set $P$ of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$. In the discrete median line segment problem, the objective is to find a line segment bounded by a pair of points in $P$ such that the sum of the Euclidean distances from $P$ to the line segment is minimized. In the continuous median line segment problem, a real number $\ell>0$ is given, and the goal is to locate a line segment of length $\ell$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$ such that the sum of the Euclidean distances between $P$ and the line segment is minimized. We show how to compute $(1+\epsilon\Delta)$- and $(1+\epsilon)$-approximations to a discrete median line segment in time $O(n\epsilon^{-2d}\log n)$ and $O(n^2\epsilon^{-d})$, respectively, where $\Delta$ is the spread of line segments spanned by pairs of points. While developing our algorithms, by using the principle of pair decomposition, we derive new data structures that allow us to quickly approximate the sum of the distances from a set of points to a given line segment or point. To our knowledge, our utilization of pair decompositions for solving minsum facility location problems is the first of its kind; it is versatile and easily implementable. We prove that it is impossible to construct a continuous median line segment for $n\geq3$ non-collinear points in the plane by using only ruler and compass. In view of this, we present an $O(n^d\epsilon^{-d})$-time algorithm for approximating a continuous median line segment in $\mathbb{R}^d$ within a factor of $1+\epsilon$. The algorithm is based upon generalizing the point-segment pair decomposition from the discrete to the continuous domain. Last but not least, we give an $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm, whose time complexity is sub-quadratic in $n$, for solving the constrained median line segment problem in $\mathbb{R}^2$ where an endpoint or the slope of the median line segment is given at input.
Recently, codes in the sum-rank metric attracted attention due to several applications in e.g. multishot network coding, distributed storage and quantum-resistant cryptography. The sum-rank analogs of Reed-Solomon and Gabidulin codes are linearized Reed-Solomon codes. We show how to construct $h$-folded linearized Reed-Solomon (FLRS) codes and derive an interpolation-based decoding scheme that is capable of correcting sum-rank errors beyond the unique decoding radius. The presented decoder can be used for either list or probabilistic unique decoding and requires at most $\mathcal{O}(sn^2)$ operations in $\mathbb{F}_{q^m}$, where $s \leq h$ is an interpolation parameter and $n$ denotes the length of the unfolded code. We derive a heuristic upper bound on the failure probability of the probabilistic unique decoder and verify the results via Monte Carlo simulations.
A triangle in a hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ is a set of three distinct edges $e, f, g\in\mathcal{H}$ and three distinct vertices $u, v, w\in V(\mathcal{H})$ such that $\{u, v\}\subseteq e$, $\{v, w\}\subseteq f$, $\{w, u\}\subseteq g$ and $\{u, v, w\}\cap e\cap f\cap g=\emptyset$. Johansson proved in 1996 that $\chi(G)=\mathcal{O}(\Delta/\log\Delta)$ for any triangle-free graph $G$ with maximum degree $\Delta$. Cooper and Mubayi later generalized the Johansson's theorem to all rank $3$ hypergraphs. In this paper we provide a common generalization of both these results for all hypergraphs, showing that if $\mathcal{H}$ is a rank $k$, triangle-free hypergraph, then the list chromatic number \[ \chi_{\ell}(\mathcal{H})\leq \mathcal{O}\left(\max_{2\leq \ell \leq k} \left\{\left( \frac{\Delta_{\ell}}{\log \Delta_{\ell}} \right)^{\frac{1}{\ell-1}} \right\}\right), \] where $\Delta_{\ell}$ is the maximum $\ell$-degree of $\mathcal{H}$. The result is sharp apart from the constant. Moreover, our result implies, generalizes and improves several earlier results on the chromatic number and also independence number of hypergraphs, while its proof is based on a different approach than prior works in hypergraphs (and therefore provides alternative proofs to them). In particular, as an application, we establish a bound on chromatic number of sparse hypergraphs in which each vertex is contained in few triangles, and thus extend results of Alon, Krivelevich and Sudakov, and Cooper and Mubayi from hypergraphs of rank 2 and 3, respectively, to all hypergraphs.
Many applications, such as system identification, classification of time series, direct and inverse problems in partial differential equations, and uncertainty quantification lead to the question of approximation of a non-linear operator between metric spaces $\mathfrak{X}$ and $\mathfrak{Y}$. We study the problem of determining the degree of approximation of a such operators on a compact subset $K_\mathfrak{X}\subset \mathfrak{X}$ using a finite amount of information. If $\mathcal{F}: K_\mathfrak{X}\to K_\mathfrak{Y}$, a well established strategy to approximate $\mathcal{F}(F)$ for some $F\in K_\mathfrak{X}$ is to encode $F$ (respectively, $\mathcal{F}(F)$) in terms of a finite number $d$ (repectively $m$) of real numbers. Together with appropriate reconstruction algorithms (decoders), the problem reduces to the approximation of $m$ functions on a compact subset of a high dimensional Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^d$, equivalently, the unit sphere $\mathbb{S}^d$ embedded in $\mathbb{R}^{d+1}$. The problem is challenging because $d$, $m$, as well as the complexity of the approximation on $\mathbb{S}^d$ are all large, and it is necessary to estimate the accuracy keeping track of the inter-dependence of all the approximations involved. In this paper, we establish constructive methods to do this efficiently; i.e., with the constants involved in the estimates on the approximation on $\\mathbb{S}^d$ being $\mathcal{O}(d^{1/6})$. We study different smoothness classes for the operators, and also propose a method for approximation of $\mathcal{F}(F)$ using only information in a small neighborhood of $F$, resulting in an effective reduction in the number of parameters involved. To further mitigate the problem of large number of parameters, we propose prefabricated networks, resulting in a substantially smaller number of effective parameters.
The promise constraint satisfaction problem (PCSP) is a recently introduced vast generalisation of the constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) that captures approximability of satisfiable instances. A PCSP instance comes with two forms of each constraint: a strict one and a weak one. Given the promise that a solution exists using the strict constraints, the task is to find a solution using the weak constraints. While there are by now several dichotomy results for fragments of PCSPs, they all consider (in some way) symmetric PCSPs. 1-in-3-SAT and Not-All-Equal-3-SAT are classic examples of Boolean symmetric (non-promise) CSPs. While both problems are NP-hard, Brakensiek and Guruswami showed [SICOP'21] that given a satisfiable instance of 1-in-3-SAT one can find a solution to the corresponding instance of (weaker) Not-All-Equal-3-SAT. In other words, the PCSP template (1-in-3,NAE) is tractable. We focus on non-symmetric PCSPs. In particular, we study PCSP templates obtained from the Boolean template (t-in-k,NAE) by either adding tuples to t-in-k or removing tuples from NAE. For the former, we classify all templates as either tractable or not solvable by the currently strongest known algorithm for PCSPs, the combined basic LP and affine IP relaxation of Brakensiek, Guruswami, Wrochna, and Zivny [SICOMP'20]. For the latter, we classify all templates as either tractable or NP-hard.
In the Strip Packing problem (SP), we are given a vertical half-strip $[0,W]\times[0,\infty)$ and a set of $n$ axis-aligned rectangles of width at most $W$. The goal is to find a non-overlapping packing of all rectangles into the strip such that the height of the packing is minimized. A well-studied and frequently used practical constraint is to allow only those packings that are guillotine separable, i.e., every rectangle in the packing can be obtained by recursively applying a sequence of edge-to-edge axis-parallel cuts (guillotine cuts) that do not intersect any item of the solution. In this paper, we study approximation algorithms for the Guillotine Strip Packing problem (GSP), i.e., the Strip Packing problem where we require additionally that the packing needs to be guillotine separable. This problem generalizes the classical Bin Packing problem and also makespan minimization on identical machines, and thus it is already strongly NP-hard. Moreover, due to a reduction from the Partition problem, it is NP-hard to obtain a polynomial-time $(3/2-\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for GSP for any $\varepsilon>0$ (exactly as Strip Packing). We provide a matching polynomial time $(3/2+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for GSP. Furthermore, we present a pseudo-polynomial time $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for GSP. This is surprising as it is NP-hard to obtain a $(5/4-\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for (general) Strip Packing in pseudo-polynomial time. Thus, our results essentially settle the approximability of GSP for both the polynomial and the pseudo-polynomial settings.
In this work we consider the approximability of $\textsf{Max-CSP}(f)$ in the context of sketching algorithms and completely characterize the approximability of all Boolean CSPs. Specifically, given $f$, $\gamma$ and $\beta$ we show that either (1) the $(\gamma,\beta)$-approximation version of $\textsf{Max-CSP}(f)$ has a linear sketching algorithm using $O(\log n)$ space, or (2) for every $\epsilon > 0$ the $(\gamma-\epsilon,\beta+\epsilon)$-approximation version of $\textsf{Max-CSP}(f)$ requires $\Omega(\sqrt{n})$ space for any sketching algorithm. We also prove lower bounds against streaming algorithms for several CSPs. In particular, we recover the streaming dichotomy of [CGV20] for $k=2$ and show streaming approximation resistance of all CSPs for which $f^{-1}(1)$ supports a distribution with uniform marginals. Our positive results show wider applicability of bias-based algorithms used previously by [GVV17] and [CGV20] by giving a systematic way to discover biases. Our negative results combine the Fourier analytic methods of [KKS15], which we extend to a wider class of CSPs, with a rich collection of reductions among communication complexity problems that lie at the heart of the negative results.
This paper describes a suite of algorithms for constructing low-rank approximations of an input matrix from a random linear image of the matrix, called a sketch. These methods can preserve structural properties of the input matrix, such as positive-semidefiniteness, and they can produce approximations with a user-specified rank. The algorithms are simple, accurate, numerically stable, and provably correct. Moreover, each method is accompanied by an informative error bound that allows users to select parameters a priori to achieve a given approximation quality. These claims are supported by numerical experiments with real and synthetic data.