亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

In up-to-date machine learning (ML) applications on cloud or edge computing platforms, batching is an important technique for providing efficient and economical services at scale. In particular, parallel computing resources on the platforms, such as graphics processing units (GPUs), have higher computational and energy efficiency with larger batch sizes. However, larger batch sizes may also result in longer response time, and thus it requires a judicious design. This paper aims to provide a dynamic batching policy that strikes a balance between efficiency and latency. The GPU-based inference service is modeled as a batch service queue with batch-size dependent processing time. Then, the design of dynamic batching is a continuous-time average-cost problem, and is formulated as a semi-Markov decision process (SMDP) with the objective of minimizing the weighted sum of average response time and average power consumption. The optimal policy is acquired by solving an associated discrete-time Markov decision process (MDP) problem with finite state approximation and "discretization". By creatively introducing an abstract cost to reflect the impact of "tail" states, the space complexity and the time complexity of the procedure can decrease by 63.5% and 98%, respectively. Our results show that the optimal policies potentially possess a control limit structure. Numerical results also show that SMDP-based batching policies can adapt to different traffic intensities and outperform other benchmark policies. Furthermore, the proposed solution has notable flexibility in balancing power consumption and latency.

The basic idea of lifelike computing systems is the transfer of concepts in living systems to technical use that goes even beyond existing concepts of self-adaptation and self-organisation (SASO). As a result, these systems become even more autonomous and changeable - up to a runtime transfer of the actual target function. Maintaining controllability requires a complete and dynamic (self-)quantification of the system behaviour with regard to aspects of SASO but also, in particular, lifelike properties. In this article, we discuss possible approaches for such metrics and establish a first metric for transferability. We analyse the behaviour of the metric using example applications and show that it is suitable for describing the system's behaviour at runtime.

Distributed graph coloring is one of the most extensively studied problems in distributed computing. There is a canonical family of distributed graph coloring algorithms known as the locally-iterative coloring algorithms, first formalized in the seminal work of [Szegedy and Vishwanathan, STOC'93]. In such algorithms, every vertex iteratively updates its own color according to a predetermined function of the current coloring of its local neighborhood. Due to the simplicity and naturalness of its framework, locally-iterative coloring algorithms are of great significance both in theory and practice. In this paper, we give a locally-iterative $(\Delta+1)$-coloring algorithm with $O(\Delta^{3/4}\log\Delta)+\log^*n$ running time. This is the first locally-iterative $(\Delta+1)$-coloring algorithm with sublinear-in-$\Delta$ running time, and answers the main open question raised in a recent breakthrough [Barenboim, Elkin, and Goldberg, JACM'21]. A key component of our algorithm is a locally-iterative procedure that transforms an $O(\Delta^2)$-coloring to a $(\Delta+O(\Delta^{3/4}\log\Delta))$-coloring in $o(\Delta)$ time. Inside this procedure we work on special proper colorings that encode (arb)defective colorings, and reduce the number of used colors quadratically in a locally-iterative fashion. As a main application of our result, we also give a self-stabilizing distributed algorithm for $(\Delta+1)$-coloring with $O(\Delta^{3/4}\log\Delta)+\log^*n$ stabilization time. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first self-stabilizing algorithm for $(\Delta+1)$-coloring with sublinear-in-$\Delta$ stabilization time.

In recent years, graphical multiple testing procedures have gained popularity due to their generality and ease of interpretation. In contemporary research, online error control is often required, where an error criterion, such as familywise error rate (FWER) or false discovery rate (FDR), shall remain under control while testing an a priori unbounded sequence of hypotheses. Although the classical graphical procedure can be extended to the online setting, previous work has shown that it leads to low power, and other approaches, such as Adaptive-Discard (ADDIS) procedures, are preferred instead. In this paper, we introduce an ADDIS-Graph with FWER control and its extension for the FDR setting. These graphical ADDIS procedures combine the good interpretability of graphical procedures with the high online power of ADDIS procedures. Moreover, they can be adapted to a local dependence structure and an asynchronous testing setup, leading to power improvements over the current state-of-art methods. Consequently, the proposed methods are useful for a wide range of applications, including innovative complex trial designs, such as platform trials, and large-scale test designs, such as in the evaluation of A/B tests for marketing research.

Several machine learning (ML) applications are characterized by searching for an optimal solution to a complex task. The search space for this optimal solution is often very large, so large in fact that this optimal solution is often not computable. Part of the problem is that many candidate solutions found via ML are actually infeasible and have to be discarded. Restricting the search space to only the feasible solution candidates simplifies finding an optimal solution for the tasks. Further, the set of feasible solutions could be re-used in multiple problems characterized by different tasks. In particular, we observe that complex tasks can be decomposed into subtasks and corresponding skills. We propose to learn a reusable and transferable skill by training an actor to generate all feasible actions. The trained actor can then propose feasible actions, among which an optimal one can be chosen according to a specific task. The actor is trained by interpreting the feasibility of each action as a target distribution. The training procedure minimizes a divergence of the actor's output distribution to this target. We derive the general optimization target for arbitrary f-divergences using a combination of kernel density estimates, resampling, and importance sampling. We further utilize an auxiliary critic to reduce the interactions with the environment. A preliminary comparison to related strategies shows that our approach learns to visit all the modes in the feasible action space, demonstrating the framework's potential for learning skills that can be used in various downstream tasks.

Prior work has identified a resilient phenomenon that threatens the performance of human-AI decision-making teams: overreliance, when people agree with an AI, even when it is incorrect. Surprisingly, overreliance does not reduce when the AI produces explanations for its predictions, compared to only providing predictions. Some have argued that overreliance results from cognitive biases or uncalibrated trust, attributing overreliance to an inevitability of human cognition. By contrast, our paper argues that people strategically choose whether or not to engage with an AI explanation, demonstrating empirically that there are scenarios where AI explanations reduce overreliance. To achieve this, we formalize this strategic choice in a cost-benefit framework, where the costs and benefits of engaging with the task are weighed against the costs and benefits of relying on the AI. We manipulate the costs and benefits in a maze task, where participants collaborate with a simulated AI to find the exit of a maze. Through 5 studies (N = 731), we find that costs such as task difficulty (Study 1), explanation difficulty (Study 2, 3), and benefits such as monetary compensation (Study 4) affect overreliance. Finally, Study 5 adapts the Cognitive Effort Discounting paradigm to quantify the utility of different explanations, providing further support for our framework. Our results suggest that some of the null effects found in literature could be due in part to the explanation not sufficiently reducing the costs of verifying the AI's prediction.

We propose a series of computationally efficient nonparametric tests for the two-sample, independence, and goodness-of-fit problems, using the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD), Hilbert Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC), and Kernel Stein Discrepancy (KSD), respectively. Our test statistics are incomplete $U$-statistics, with a computational cost that interpolates between linear time in the number of samples, and quadratic time, as associated with classical $U$-statistic tests. The three proposed tests aggregate over several kernel bandwidths to detect departures from the null on various scales: we call the resulting tests MMDAggInc, HSICAggInc and KSDAggInc. This procedure provides a solution to the fundamental kernel selection problem as we can aggregate a large number of kernels with several bandwidths without incurring a significant loss of test power. For the test thresholds, we derive a quantile bound for wild bootstrapped incomplete $U$-statistics, which is of independent interest. We derive non-asymptotic uniform separation rates for MMDAggInc and HSICAggInc, and quantify exactly the trade-off between computational efficiency and the attainable rates: this result is novel for tests based on incomplete $U$-statistics, to our knowledge. We further show that in the quadratic-time case, the wild bootstrap incurs no penalty to test power over the more widespread permutation-based approach, since both attain the same minimax optimal rates (which in turn match the rates that use oracle quantiles). We support our claims with numerical experiments on the trade-off between computational efficiency and test power. In all three testing frameworks, the linear-time versions of our proposed tests perform at least as well as the current linear-time state-of-the-art tests.

Limited look-ahead game solving for imperfect-information games is the breakthrough that allowed defeating expert humans in large poker. The existing algorithms of this type assume that all players are perfectly rational and do not allow explicit modeling and exploitation of the opponent's flaws. As a result, even very weak opponents can tie or lose only very slowly against these powerful methods. We present the first algorithm that allows incorporating opponent models into limited look-ahead game solving. Using only an approximation of a single (optimal) value function, the algorithm efficiently exploits an arbitrary estimate of the opponent's strategy. It guarantees a bounded worst-case loss for the player. We also show that using existing resolving gadgets is problematic and why we need to keep the previously solved parts of the game. Experiments on three different games show that over half of the maximum possible exploitation is achieved by our algorithm without risking almost any loss.

Classic algorithms and machine learning systems like neural networks are both abundant in everyday life. While classic computer science algorithms are suitable for precise execution of exactly defined tasks such as finding the shortest path in a large graph, neural networks allow learning from data to predict the most likely answer in more complex tasks such as image classification, which cannot be reduced to an exact algorithm. To get the best of both worlds, this thesis explores combining both concepts leading to more robust, better performing, more interpretable, more computationally efficient, and more data efficient architectures. The thesis formalizes the idea of algorithmic supervision, which allows a neural network to learn from or in conjunction with an algorithm. When integrating an algorithm into a neural architecture, it is important that the algorithm is differentiable such that the architecture can be trained end-to-end and gradients can be propagated back through the algorithm in a meaningful way. To make algorithms differentiable, this thesis proposes a general method for continuously relaxing algorithms by perturbing variables and approximating the expectation value in closed form, i.e., without sampling. In addition, this thesis proposes differentiable algorithms, such as differentiable sorting networks, differentiable renderers, and differentiable logic gate networks. Finally, this thesis presents alternative training strategies for learning with algorithms.

Deep learning techniques have received much attention in the area of image denoising. However, there are substantial differences in the various types of deep learning methods dealing with image denoising. Specifically, discriminative learning based on deep learning can ably address the issue of Gaussian noise. Optimization models based on deep learning are effective in estimating the real noise. However, there has thus far been little related research to summarize the different deep learning techniques for image denoising. In this paper, we offer a comparative study of deep techniques in image denoising. We first classify the deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for additive white noisy images; the deep CNNs for real noisy images; the deep CNNs for blind denoising and the deep CNNs for hybrid noisy images, which represents the combination of noisy, blurred and low-resolution images. Then, we analyze the motivations and principles of the different types of deep learning methods. Next, we compare the state-of-the-art methods on public denoising datasets in terms of quantitative and qualitative analysis. Finally, we point out some potential challenges and directions of future research.