亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

In streaming PCA, we see a stream of vectors $x_1, \dotsc, x_n \in \mathbb{R}^d$ and want to estimate the top eigenvector of their covariance matrix. This is easier if the spectral ratio $R = \lambda_1 / \lambda_2$ is large. We ask: how large does $R$ need to be to solve streaming PCA in $\widetilde{O}(d)$ space? Existing algorithms require $R = \widetilde{\Omega}(d)$. We show: (1) For all mergeable summaries, $R = \widetilde{\Omega}(\sqrt{d})$ is necessary. (2) In the insertion-only model, a variant of Oja's algorithm gets $o(1)$ error for $R = O(\log n \log d)$. (3) No algorithm with $o(d^2)$ space gets $o(1)$ error for $R = O(1)$. Our analysis is the first application of Oja's algorithm to adversarial streams. It is also the first algorithm for adversarial streaming PCA that is designed for a spectral, rather than Frobenius, bound on the tail; and the bound it needs is exponentially better than is possible by adapting a Frobenius guarantee.

We introduce the novel class $(E_\alpha)_{\alpha \in [-\infty,1)}$ of reverse map projection embeddings, each one defining a unique new method of encoding classical data into quantum states. Inspired by well-known map projections from the unit sphere onto its tangent planes, used in practice in cartography, these embeddings address the common drawback of the amplitude embedding method, wherein scalar multiples of data points are identified and information about the norm of data is lost. We show how reverse map projections can be utilised as equivariant embeddings for quantum machine learning. Using these methods, we can leverage symmetries in classical datasets to significantly strengthen performance on quantum machine learning tasks. Finally, we select four values of $\alpha$ with which to perform a simple classification task, taking $E_\alpha$ as the embedding and experimenting with both equivariant and non-equivariant setups. We compare their results alongside those of standard amplitude embedding.

Nonparametric contextual bandit is an important model of sequential decision making problems. Under $\alpha$-Tsybakov margin condition, existing research has established a regret bound of $\tilde{O}\left(T^{1-\frac{\alpha+1}{d+2}}\right)$ for bounded supports. However, the optimal regret with unbounded contexts has not been analyzed. The challenge of solving contextual bandit problems with unbounded support is to achieve both exploration-exploitation tradeoff and bias-variance tradeoff simultaneously. In this paper, we solve the nonparametric contextual bandit problem with unbounded contexts. We propose two nearest neighbor methods combined with UCB exploration. The first method uses a fixed $k$. Our analysis shows that this method achieves minimax optimal regret under a weak margin condition and relatively light-tailed context distributions. The second method uses adaptive $k$. By a proper data-driven selection of $k$, this method achieves an expected regret of $\tilde{O}\left(T^{1-\frac{(\alpha+1)\beta}{\alpha+(d+2)\beta}}+T^{1-\beta}\right)$, in which $\beta$ is a parameter describing the tail strength. This bound matches the minimax lower bound up to logarithm factors, indicating that the second method is approximately optimal.

The orthogonality dimension of a graph over $\mathbb{R}$ is the smallest integer $d$ for which one can assign to every vertex a nonzero vector in $\mathbb{R}^d$ such that every two adjacent vertices receive orthogonal vectors. For an integer $d$, the $d$-Ortho-Dim$_\mathbb{R}$ problem asks to decide whether the orthogonality dimension of a given graph over $\mathbb{R}$ is at most $d$. We prove that for every integer $d \geq 3$, the $d$-Ortho-Dim$_\mathbb{R}$ problem parameterized by the vertex cover number $k$ admits a kernel with $O(k^{d-1})$ vertices and bit-size $O(k^{d-1} \cdot \log k)$. We complement this result by a nearly matching lower bound, showing that for any $\varepsilon > 0$, the problem admits no kernel of bit-size $O(k^{d-1-\varepsilon})$ unless $\mathsf{NP} \subseteq \mathsf{coNP/poly}$. We further study the kernelizability of orthogonality dimension problems in additional settings, including over general fields and under various structural parameterizations.

We use the polynomial method of Guth and Katz to establish stronger and {\it more efficient} regularity and density theorems for such $k$-uniform hypergraphs $H=(P,E)$, where $P$ is a finite point set in ${\mathbb R}^d$, and the edge set $E$ is determined by a semi-algebraic relation of bounded description complexity. In particular, for any $0<\epsilon\leq 1$ we show that one can construct in $O\left(n\log (1/\epsilon)\right)$ time, an equitable partition $P=U_1\uplus \ldots\uplus U_K$ into $K=O(1/\epsilon^{d+1+\delta})$ subsets, for any $0<\delta$, so that all but $\epsilon$-fraction of the $k$-tuples $U_{i_1},\ldots,U_{i_k}$ are {\it homogeneous}: we have that either $U_{i_1}\times\ldots\times U_{i_k}\subseteq E$ or $(U_{i_1}\times\ldots\times U_{i_k})\cap E=\emptyset$. If the points of $P$ can be perturbed in a general position, the bound improves to $O(1/\epsilon^{d+1})$, and the partition is attained via a {\it single partitioning polynomial} (albeit, at expense of a possible increase in worst-case running time). In contrast to the previous such regularity lemmas which were established by Fox, Gromov, Lafforgue, Naor, and Pach and, subsequently, Fox, Pach and Suk, our partition of $P$ does not depend on the edge set $E$ provided its semi-algebraic description complexity does not exceed a certain constant. As a by-product, we show that in any $k$-partite $k$-uniform hypergraph $(P_1\uplus\ldots\uplus P_k,E)$ of bounded semi-algebraic description complexity in ${\mathbb R}^d$ and with $|E|\geq \epsilon \prod_{i=1}^k|P_i|$ edges, one can find, in expected time $O\left(\sum_{i=1}^k\left(|P_i|+1/\epsilon)\right)\log (1/\epsilon)\right)$, subsets $Q_i\subseteq P_i$ of cardinality $|Q_i|\geq |P_i|/\epsilon^{d+1+\delta}$, so that $Q_1\times\ldots\times Q_k\subseteq E$.

We consider the problem of linearizing a pseudo-Boolean function $f : \{0,1\}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ by means of $k$ Boolean functions. Such a linearization yields an integer linear programming formulation with only $k$ auxiliary variables. This motivates the definition of the linarization complexity of $f$ as the minimum such $k$. Our theoretical contributions are the proof that random polynomials almost surely have a high linearization complexity and characterizations of its value in case we do or do not restrict the set of admissible Boolean functions. The practical relevance is shown by devising and evaluating integer linear programming models of two such linearizations for the low auto-correlation binary sequences problem. Still, many problems around this new concept remain open.

Khosravi, Drnov\v{s}ek and Moslehian [\textit{Filomat, 2012}] derived Buzano inequality for Hilbert C*-modules. Using this inequality we derive Deutsch entropic uncertainty principle for Hilbert C*-modules over commutative unital C*-algebras.

Level set estimation (LSE), the problem of identifying the set of input points where a function takes value above (or below) a given threshold, is important in practical applications. When the function is expensive-to-evaluate and black-box, the \textit{straddle} algorithm, which is a representative heuristic for LSE based on Gaussian process models, and its extensions having theoretical guarantees have been developed. However, many of existing methods include a confidence parameter $\beta^{1/2}_t$ that must be specified by the user, and methods that choose $\beta^{1/2}_t$ heuristically do not provide theoretical guarantees. In contrast, theoretically guaranteed values of $\beta^{1/2}_t$ need to be increased depending on the number of iterations and candidate points, and are conservative and not good for practical performance. In this study, we propose a novel method, the \textit{randomized straddle} algorithm, in which $\beta_t$ in the straddle algorithm is replaced by a random sample from the chi-squared distribution with two degrees of freedom. The confidence parameter in the proposed method has the advantages of not needing adjustment, not depending on the number of iterations and candidate points, and not being conservative. Furthermore, we show that the proposed method has theoretical guarantees that depend on the sample complexity and the number of iterations. Finally, we confirm the usefulness of the proposed method through numerical experiments using synthetic and real data.

Selecting $k$ out of $m$ items based on the preferences of $n$ heterogeneous agents is a widely studied problem in algorithmic game theory. If agents have approval preferences over individual items and harmonic utility functions over bundles -- an agent receives $\sum_{j=1}^t\frac{1}{j}$ utility if $t$ of her approved items are selected -- then welfare optimisation is captured by a voting rule known as Proportional Approval Voting (PAV). PAV also satisfies demanding fairness axioms. However, finding a winning set of items under PAV is NP-hard. In search of a tractable method with strong fairness guarantees, a bounded local search version of PAV was proposed by Aziz et al. It proceeds by starting with an arbitrary size-$k$ set $W$ and, at each step, checking if there is a pair of candidates $a\in W$, $b\not\in W$ such that swapping $a$ and $b$ increases the total welfare by at least $\varepsilon$; if yes, it performs the swap. Aziz et al.~show that setting $\varepsilon=\frac{n}{k^2}$ ensures both the desired fairness guarantees and polynomial running time. However, they leave it open whether the algorithm converges in polynomial time if $\varepsilon$ is very small (in particular, if we do not stop until there are no welfare-improving swaps). We resolve this open question, by showing that if $\varepsilon$ can be arbitrarily small, the running time of this algorithm may be super-polynomial. Specifically, we prove a lower bound of~$\Omega(k^{\log k})$ if improvements are chosen lexicographically. To complement our lower bound, we provide an empirical comparison of two variants of local search -- better-response and best-response -- on several real-life data sets and a variety of synthetic data sets. Our experiments indicate that, empirically, better response exhibits faster running time than best response.