亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

Gradient Descent (GD) and Conjugate Gradient (CG) methods are among the most effective iterative algorithms for solving unconstrained optimization problems, particularly in machine learning and statistical modeling, where they are employed to minimize cost functions. In these algorithms, tunable parameters, such as step sizes or conjugate parameters, play a crucial role in determining key performance metrics, like runtime and solution quality. In this work, we introduce a framework that models algorithm selection as a statistical learning problem, and thus learning complexity can be estimated by the pseudo-dimension of the algorithm group. We first propose a new cost measure for unconstrained optimization algorithms, inspired by the concept of primal-dual integral in mixed-integer linear programming. Based on the new cost measure, we derive an improved upper bound for the pseudo-dimension of gradient descent algorithm group by discretizing the set of step size configurations. Moreover, we generalize our findings from gradient descent algorithm to the conjugate gradient algorithm group for the first time, and prove the existence a learning algorithm capable of probabilistically identifying the optimal algorithm with a sufficiently large sample size.

We prove, for stably computably enumerable formal systems, direct analogues of the first and second incompleteness theorems of G\"odel. A typical stably computably enumerable set is the set of Diophantine equations with no integer solutions, and in particular such sets are generally not computably enumerable. And so this gives the first extension of the second incompleteness theorem to non classically computable formal systems. Let's motivate this with a somewhat physical application. Let $\mathcal{H} $ be the suitable infinite time limit (stabilization in the sense of the paper) of the mathematical output of humanity, specializing to first order sentences in the language of arithmetic (for simplicity), and understood as a formal system. Suppose that all the relevant physical processes in the formation of $\mathcal{H} $ are Turing computable. Then as defined $\mathcal{H} $ may \emph{not} be computably enumerable, but it is stably computably enumerable. Thus, the classical G\"odel disjunction applied to $\mathcal{H} $ is meaningless, but applying our incompleteness theorems to $\mathcal{H} $ we then get a sharper version of G\"odel's disjunction: assume $\mathcal{H} \vdash PA$ then either $\mathcal{H} $ is not stably computably enumerable or $\mathcal{H} $ is not 1-consistent (in particular is not sound) or $\mathcal{H} $ cannot prove a certain true statement of arithmetic (and cannot disprove it if in addition $\mathcal{H} $ is 2-consistent).

Computing the crossing number of a graph is one of the most classical problems in computational geometry. Both it and numerous variations of the problem have been studied, and overcoming their frequent computational difficulty is an active area of research. Particularly recently, there has been increased effort to show and understand the parameterized tractability of various crossing number variants. While many results in this direction use a similar approach, a general framework remains elusive. We suggest such a framework that generalizes important previous results, and can even be used to show the tractability of deciding crossing number variants for which this was stated as an open problem in previous literature. Our framework targets variants that prescribe a partial predrawing and some kind of topological restrictions on crossings. Additionally, to provide evidence for the non-generalizability of previous approaches for the partially crossing number problem to allow for geometric restrictions, we show a new more constrained hardness result for partially predrawn rectilinear crossing number. In particular, we show W-hardness of deciding Straight-Line Planarity Extension parameterized by the number of missing edges.

Random effects meta-analysis is widely used for synthesizing studies under the assumption that underlying effects come from a normal distribution. However, under certain conditions the use of alternative distributions might be more appropriate. We conducted a systematic review to identify articles introducing alternative meta-analysis models assuming non-normal between-study distributions. We identified 27 eligible articles suggesting 24 alternative meta-analysis models based on long-tail and skewed distributions, on mixtures of distributions, and on Dirichlet process priors. Subsequently, we performed a simulation study to evaluate the performance of these models and to compare them with the standard normal model. We considered 22 scenarios varying the amount of between-study variance, the shape of the true distribution, and the number of included studies. We compared 15 models implemented in the Frequentist or in the Bayesian framework. We found small differences with respect to bias between the different models but larger differences in the level of coverage probability. In scenarios with large between-study variance, all models were substantially biased in the estimation of the mean treatment effect. This implies that focusing only on the mean treatment effect of random effects meta-analysis can be misleading when substantial heterogeneity is suspected or outliers are present.

Many combinatorial optimization problems can be formulated as the search for a subgraph that satisfies certain properties and minimizes the total weight. We assume here that the vertices correspond to points in a metric space and can take any position in given uncertainty sets. Then, the cost function to be minimized is the sum of the distances for the worst positions of the vertices in their uncertainty sets. We propose two types of polynomial-time approximation algorithms. The first one relies on solving a deterministic counterpart of the problem where the uncertain distances are replaced with maximum pairwise distances. We study in details the resulting approximation ratio, which depends on the structure of the feasible subgraphs and whether the metric space is Ptolemaic or not. The second algorithm is a fully-polynomial time approximation scheme for the special case of $s-t$ paths.

A new variant of the GMRES method is presented for solving linear systems with the same matrix and subsequently obtained multiple right-hand sides. The new method keeps such properties of the classical GMRES algorithm as follows. Both bases of the search space and its image are maintained orthonormal that increases the robustness of the method. Moreover there is no need to store both bases since they are effectively represented within a common basis. Along with it our method is theoretically equivalent to the GCR method extended for a case of multiple right-hand sides but is more numerically robust and requires less memory. The main result of the paper is a mechanism of adding an arbitrary direction vector to the search space that can be easily adopted for flexible GMRES or GMRES with deflated restarting.

For several types of information relations, the induced rough sets system RS does not form a lattice but only a partially ordered set. However, by studying its Dedekind-MacNeille completion DM(RS), one may reveal new important properties of rough set structures. Building upon D. Umadevi's work on describing joins and meets in DM(RS), we previously investigated pseudo-Kleene algebras defined on DM(RS) for reflexive relations. This paper delves deeper into the order-theoretic properties of DM(RS) in the context of reflexive relations. We describe the completely join-irreducible elements of DM(RS) and characterize when DM(RS) is a spatial completely distributive lattice. We show that even in the case of a non-transitive reflexive relation, DM(RS) can form a Nelson algebra, a property generally associated with quasiorders. We introduce a novel concept, the core of a relational neighborhood, and use it to provide a necessary and sufficient condition for DM(RS) to determine a Nelson algebra.

We propose and analyse a boundary-preserving numerical scheme for the weak approximations of some stochastic partial differential equations (SPDEs) with bounded state-space. We impose regularity assumptions on the drift and diffusion coefficients only locally on the state-space. In particular, the drift and diffusion coefficients may be non-globally Lipschitz continuous and superlinearly growing. The scheme consists of a finite difference discretisation in space and a Lie--Trotter splitting followed by exact simulation and exact integration in time. We prove weak convergence of optimal order 1/4 for globally Lipschitz continuous test functions of the scheme by proving strong convergence towards a strong solution driven by a different noise process. Boundary-preservation is ensured by the use of Lie--Trotter time splitting followed by exact simulation and exact integration. Numerical experiments confirm the theoretical results and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed Lie--Trotter-Exact (LTE) scheme compared to existing methods for SPDEs.

Regularization is a critical technique for ensuring well-posedness in solving inverse problems with incomplete measurement data. Traditionally, the regularization term is designed based on prior knowledge of the unknown signal's characteristics, such as sparsity or smoothness. Inhomogeneous regularization, which incorporates a spatially varying exponent $p$ in the standard $\ell_p$-norm-based framework, has been used to recover signals with spatially varying features. This study introduces weighted inhomogeneous regularization, an extension of the standard approach incorporating a novel exponent design and spatially varying weights. The proposed exponent design mitigates misclassification when distinct characteristics are spatially close, while the weights address challenges in recovering regions with small-scale features that are inadequately captured by traditional $\ell_p$-norm regularization. Numerical experiments, including synthetic image reconstruction and the recovery of sea ice data from incomplete wave measurements, demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

The goal of explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is to generate human-interpretable explanations, but there are no computationally precise theories of how humans interpret AI generated explanations. The lack of theory means that validation of XAI must be done empirically, on a case-by-case basis, which prevents systematic theory-building in XAI. We propose a psychological theory of how humans draw conclusions from saliency maps, the most common form of XAI explanation, which for the first time allows for precise prediction of explainee inference conditioned on explanation. Our theory posits that absent explanation humans expect the AI to make similar decisions to themselves, and that they interpret an explanation by comparison to the explanations they themselves would give. Comparison is formalized via Shepard's universal law of generalization in a similarity space, a classic theory from cognitive science. A pre-registered user study on AI image classifications with saliency map explanations demonstrate that our theory quantitatively matches participants' predictions of the AI.