亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

We study generalization bounds for noisy stochastic mini-batch iterative algorithms based on the notion of stability. Recent years have seen key advances in data-dependent generalization bounds for noisy iterative learning algorithms such as stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics (SGLD) based on stability (Mou et al., 2018; Li et al., 2020) and information theoretic approaches (Xu and Raginsky, 2017; Negrea et al., 2019; Steinke and Zakynthinou, 2020; Haghifam et al., 2020). In this paper, we unify and substantially generalize stability based generalization bounds and make three technical advances. First, we bound the generalization error of general noisy stochastic iterative algorithms (not necessarily gradient descent) in terms of expected (not uniform) stability. The expected stability can in turn be bounded by a Le Cam Style Divergence. Such bounds have a O(1/n) sample dependence unlike many existing bounds with O(1/\sqrt{n}) dependence. Second, we introduce Exponential Family Langevin Dynamics(EFLD) which is a substantial generalization of SGLD and which allows exponential family noise to be used with stochastic gradient descent (SGD). We establish data-dependent expected stability based generalization bounds for general EFLD algorithms. Third, we consider an important special case of EFLD: noisy sign-SGD, which extends sign-SGD using Bernoulli noise over {-1,+1}. Generalization bounds for noisy sign-SGD are implied by that of EFLD and we also establish optimization guarantees for the algorithm. Further, we present empirical results on benchmark datasets to illustrate that our bounds are non-vacuous and quantitatively much sharper than existing bounds.

Power is an important aspect of experimental design, because it allows researchers to understand the chance of detecting causal effects if they exist. It is common to specify a desired level of power, and then compute the sample size necessary to obtain that level of power; thus, power calculations help determine how experiments are conducted in practice. Power and sample size calculations are readily available for completely randomized experiments; however, there can be many benefits to using other experimental designs. For example, in recent years it has been established that rerandomized designs, where subjects are randomized until a prespecified level of covariate balance is obtained, increase the precision of causal effect estimators. This work establishes the statistical power of rerandomized treatment-control experiments, thereby allowing for sample size calculators. Our theoretical results also clarify how power and sample size are affected by treatment effect heterogeneity, a quantity that is often ignored in power analyses. Via simulation, we confirm our theoretical results and find that rerandomization can lead to substantial sample size reductions; e.g., in many realistic scenarios, rerandomization can lead to a 25% or even 50% reduction in sample size for a fixed level of power, compared to complete randomization. Power and sample size calculators based on our results are in the R package rerandPower on CRAN.

General policy improvement (GPI) and trust-region learning (TRL) are the predominant frameworks within contemporary reinforcement learning (RL), which serve as the core models for solving Markov decision processes (MDPs). Unfortunately, in their mathematical form, they are sensitive to modifications, and thus, the practical instantiations that implement them do not automatically inherit their improvement guarantees. As a result, the spectrum of available rigorous MDP-solvers is narrow. Indeed, many state-of-the-art (SOTA) algorithms, such as TRPO and PPO, are not proven to converge. In this paper, we propose \textsl{mirror learning} -- a general solution to the RL problem. We reveal GPI and TRL to be but small points within this far greater space of algorithms which boasts the monotonic improvement property and converges to the optimal policy. We show that virtually all SOTA algorithms for RL are instances of mirror learning, and thus suggest that their empirical performance is a consequence of their theoretical properties, rather than of approximate analogies. Excitingly, we show that mirror learning opens up a whole new space of policy learning methods with convergence guarantees.

Tensor optimization is crucial to massive machine learning and signal processing tasks. In this paper, we consider tensor optimization with a convex and well-conditioned objective function and reformulate it into a nonconvex optimization using the Burer-Monteiro type parameterization. We analyze the local convergence of applying vanilla gradient descent to the factored formulation and establish a local regularity condition under mild assumptions. We also provide a linear convergence analysis of the gradient descent algorithm started in a neighborhood of the true tensor factors. Complementary to the local analysis, this work also characterizes the global geometry of the best rank-one tensor approximation problem and demonstrates that for orthogonally decomposable tensors the problem has no spurious local minima and all saddle points are strict except for the one at zero which is a third-order saddle point.

Spectral clustering has been one of the widely used methods for community detection in networks. However, large-scale networks bring computational challenges to the eigenvalue decomposition therein. In this paper, we study the spectral clustering using randomized sketching algorithms from a statistical perspective, where we typically assume the network data are generated from a stochastic block model that is not necessarily of full rank. To do this, we first use the recently developed sketching algorithms to obtain two randomized spectral clustering algorithms, namely, the random projection-based and the random sampling-based spectral clustering. Then we study the theoretical bounds of the resulting algorithms in terms of the approximation error for the population adjacency matrix, the misclassification error, and the estimation error for the link probability matrix. It turns out that, under mild conditions, the randomized spectral clustering algorithms lead to the same theoretical bounds as those of the original spectral clustering algorithm. We also extend the results to degree-corrected stochastic block models. Numerical experiments support our theoretical findings and show the efficiency of randomized methods. A new R package called Rclust is developed and made available to the public.

Inference about a scalar parameter of interest typically relies on the asymptotic normality of common likelihood pivots, such as the signed likelihood root, the score and Wald statistics. Nevertheless, the resulting inferential procedures are known to perform poorly when the dimension of the nuisance parameter is large relative to the sample size and when the information about the parameters is limited. In many such cases, the use of asymptotic normality of analytical modifications of the signed likelihood root is known to recover inferential performance. It is proved here that parametric bootstrap of standard likelihood pivots results in as accurate inferences as analytical modifications of the signed likelihood root do in stratified models with stratum specific nuisance parameters. We focus on the challenging case where the number of strata increases as fast or faster than the stratum samples size. It is also shown that this equivalence holds regardless of whether constrained or unconstrained bootstrap is used. This is in contrast to when the number of strata is fixed or increases slower than the stratum sample size, where we show that constrained bootstrap corrects inference to a higher order than unconstrained bootstrap. Simulation experiments support the theoretical findings and demonstrate the excellent performance of bootstrap in extreme scenarios.

We consider interpolation learning in high-dimensional linear regression with Gaussian data, and prove a generic uniform convergence guarantee on the generalization error of interpolators in an arbitrary hypothesis class in terms of the class's Gaussian width. Applying the generic bound to Euclidean norm balls recovers the consistency result of Bartlett et al. (2020) for minimum-norm interpolators, and confirms a prediction of Zhou et al. (2020) for near-minimal-norm interpolators in the special case of Gaussian data. We demonstrate the generality of the bound by applying it to the simplex, obtaining a novel consistency result for minimum l1-norm interpolators (basis pursuit). Our results show how norm-based generalization bounds can explain and be used to analyze benign overfitting, at least in some settings.

The rapid recent progress in machine learning (ML) has raised a number of scientific questions that challenge the longstanding dogma of the field. One of the most important riddles is the good empirical generalization of overparameterized models. Overparameterized models are excessively complex with respect to the size of the training dataset, which results in them perfectly fitting (i.e., interpolating) the training data, which is usually noisy. Such interpolation of noisy data is traditionally associated with detrimental overfitting, and yet a wide range of interpolating models -- from simple linear models to deep neural networks -- have recently been observed to generalize extremely well on fresh test data. Indeed, the recently discovered double descent phenomenon has revealed that highly overparameterized models often improve over the best underparameterized model in test performance. Understanding learning in this overparameterized regime requires new theory and foundational empirical studies, even for the simplest case of the linear model. The underpinnings of this understanding have been laid in very recent analyses of overparameterized linear regression and related statistical learning tasks, which resulted in precise analytic characterizations of double descent. This paper provides a succinct overview of this emerging theory of overparameterized ML (henceforth abbreviated as TOPML) that explains these recent findings through a statistical signal processing perspective. We emphasize the unique aspects that define the TOPML research area as a subfield of modern ML theory and outline interesting open questions that remain.

When and why can a neural network be successfully trained? This article provides an overview of optimization algorithms and theory for training neural networks. First, we discuss the issue of gradient explosion/vanishing and the more general issue of undesirable spectrum, and then discuss practical solutions including careful initialization and normalization methods. Second, we review generic optimization methods used in training neural networks, such as SGD, adaptive gradient methods and distributed methods, and theoretical results for these algorithms. Third, we review existing research on the global issues of neural network training, including results on bad local minima, mode connectivity, lottery ticket hypothesis and infinite-width analysis.

In this paper, we study the optimal convergence rate for distributed convex optimization problems in networks. We model the communication restrictions imposed by the network as a set of affine constraints and provide optimal complexity bounds for four different setups, namely: the function $F(\xb) \triangleq \sum_{i=1}^{m}f_i(\xb)$ is strongly convex and smooth, either strongly convex or smooth or just convex. Our results show that Nesterov's accelerated gradient descent on the dual problem can be executed in a distributed manner and obtains the same optimal rates as in the centralized version of the problem (up to constant or logarithmic factors) with an additional cost related to the spectral gap of the interaction matrix. Finally, we discuss some extensions to the proposed setup such as proximal friendly functions, time-varying graphs, improvement of the condition numbers.