Suppose we are given a set $\cal B$ of blue points and a set $\cal R$ of red points, all lying above a horizontal line $\ell$, in the plane. Let the weight of a given point $p_i\in {\cal B}\cup{\cal R}$ be $w_i>0$ if $p_i\in {\cal B}$ and $w_i<0$ if $p_i\in {\cal R}$, $|{\cal B}\cup{\cal R}|=n$, and $d^0$($=d\setminus\partial d$) be the interior of any geometric object $d$. We wish to pack $k$ non-overlapping congruent disks $d_1$, $d_2$, \ldots, $d_k$ of minimum radius, centered on $\ell$ such that $\sum\limits_{j=1}^k\sum\limits_{\{i:\exists p_i\in{\cal R}, p_i\in d_j^0\}}w_i+\sum\limits_{j=1}^k\sum\limits_{\{i:\exists p_i\in{\cal B}, p_i\in d_j\}}w_i$ is maximized, i.e., the sum of the weights of the points covered by $\bigcup\limits_{j=1}^kd_j$ is maximized. Here, the disks are the obnoxious or undesirable facilities generating nuisance or damage (with quantity equal to $w_i$) to every demand point (e.g., population center) $p_i\in {\cal R}$ lying in their interior. In contrast, they are the desirable facilities giving service (equal to $w_i$) to every demand point $p_i\in {\cal B}$ covered by them. The line $\ell$ represents a straight highway or railway line. These $k$ semi-obnoxious facilities need to be established on $\ell$ to receive the largest possible overall service for the nearby attractive demand points while causing minimum damage to the nearby repelling demand points. We show that the problem can be solved optimally in $O(n^4k^2)$ time. Subsequently, we improve the running time to $O(n^3k \cdot\max{(\log n, k)})$. The above-weighted variation of locating $k$ semi-obnoxious facilities may generalize the problem that Bereg et al. (2015) studied where $k=1$ i.e., the smallest radius maximum weight circle is to be centered on a line. Furthermore, we addressed two special cases of the problem where points do not have arbitrary weights.
相關內容
The (Perfect) Matching Cut problem is to decide if a graph $G$ has a (perfect) matching cut, i.e., a (perfect) matching that is also an edge cut of $G$. Both Matching Cut and Perfect Matching Cut are known to be NP-complete. A perfect matching cut is also a matching cut with maximum number of edges. To increase our understanding of the relationship between the two problems, we introduce the Maximum Matching Cut problem. This problem is to determine a largest matching cut in a graph. We generalize and unify known polynomial-time algorithms for Matching Cut and Perfect Matching Cut restricted to graphs of diameter at most $2$ and to $(P_6+sP_2)$-free graphs. We also show that the complexity of Maximum Matching Cut differs from the complexities of Matching Cut and Perfect Matching Cut by proving NP-hardness of Maximum Matching Cut for $2P_3$-free quadrangulated graphs of diameter $3$ and radius $2$ and for subcubic line graphs of triangle-free graphs. In this way, we obtain full dichotomies of Maximum Matching Cut for graphs of bounded diameter, bounded radius and $H$-free graphs. Finally, we apply our techniques to get a dichotomy for the Maximum Disconnected Perfect Matching problem for $H$-free graphs. A disconnected perfect matching of a graph $G$ is a perfect matching that contains a matching cut of $G$. The Maximum Disconnected Perfect Matching problem asks to determine for a connected graph $G$, a disconnected perfect matching with a largest matching cut over all disconnected perfect matchings of $G$. Our dichotomy result implies that the original decision problem Disconnected Perfect Matching is polynomial-time solvable for $(P_6+sP_2)$-free graphs for every $s\geq 0$, which resolves an open problem of Bouquet and Picouleau (arXiv, 2020).
A subsequence of a word $w$ is a word $u$ such that $u = w[i_1] w[i_2] \dots w[i_{k}]$, for some set of indices $1 \leq i_1 < i_2 < \dots < i_k \leq \lvert w\rvert$. A word $w$ is $k$-subsequence universal over an alphabet $\Sigma$ if every word in $\Sigma^k$ appears in $w$ as a subsequence. In this paper, we study the intersection between the set of $k$-subsequence universal words over some alphabet $\Sigma$ and regular languages over $\Sigma$. We call a regular language $L$ \emph{$k$-$\exists$-subsequence universal} if there exists a $k$-subsequence universal word in $L$, and \emph{$k$-$\forall$-subsequence universal} if every word of $L$ is $k$-subsequence universal. We give algorithms solving the problems of deciding if a given regular language, represented by a finite automaton recognising it, is \emph{$k$-$\exists$-subsequence universal} and, respectively, if it is \emph{$k$-$\forall$-subsequence universal}, for a given $k$. The algorithms are FPT w.r.t.~the size of the input alphabet, and their run-time does not depend on $k$; they run in polynomial time in the number $n$ of states of the input automaton when the size of the input alphabet is $O(\log n)$. Moreover, we show that the problem of deciding if a given regular language is \emph{$k$-$\exists$-subsequence universal} is NP-complete, when the language is over a large alphabet. Further, we provide algorithms for counting the number of $k$-subsequence universal words (paths) accepted by a given deterministic (respectively, nondeterministic) finite automaton, and ranking an input word (path) within the set of $k$-subsequence universal words accepted by a given finite automaton.
Higher Type Arithmetic (HA$^w$) is a first-order many-sorted theory. It is a conservative extension of Heyting Arithmetic obtained by extending the syntax of terms to all of System T: the objects of interest here are the functionals of higher types. While equality between natural numbers is specified by the axioms of Peano, how can equality between functionals be defined? From this question, different versions of HA$^w$ arise, such as an extensional version (E-HA$^w$) and an intentional version (I-HA$^w$). In this work, we will see how the study of partial equivalence relations leads us to design a translation by parametricity from E-HA$^w$ to HA$^w$.
Because $\Sigma^p_2$- and $\Sigma^p_3$-hardness proofs are usually tedious and difficult, not so many complete problems for these classes are known. This is especially true in the areas of min-max regret robust optimization, network interdiction, most vital vertex problems, blocker problems, and two-stage adjustable robust optimization problems. Even though these areas are well-researched for over two decades and one would naturally expect many (if not most) of the problems occurring in these areas to be complete for the above classes, almost no completeness results exist in the literature. We address this lack of knowledge by introducing over 70 new $\Sigma^p_2$-complete and $\Sigma^p_3$-complete problems. We achieve this result by proving a new meta-theorem, which shows $\Sigma^p_2$- and $\Sigma^p_3$-completeness simultaneously for a huge class of problems. The majority of all earlier publications on $\Sigma^p_2$- and $\Sigma^p_3$-completeness in said areas are special cases of our meta-theorem. Our precise result is the following: We introduce a large list of problems for which the meta-theorem is applicable (including clique, vertex cover, knapsack, TSP, facility location and many more). For every problem on this list, we show: The interdiction/minimum cost blocker/most vital nodes problem (with element costs) is $\Sigma^p_2$-complete. The min-max-regret problem with interval uncertainty is $\Sigma^p_2$-complete. The two-stage adjustable robust optimization problem with discrete budgeted uncertainty is $\Sigma^p_3$-complete. In summary, our work reveals the interesting insight that a large amount of NP-complete problems have the property that their min-max versions are 'automatically' $\Sigma^p_2$-complete.
The pseudo-inverse of a graph Laplacian matrix, denoted as $L^\dagger$, finds extensive application in various graph analysis tasks. Notable examples include the calculation of electrical closeness centrality, determination of Kemeny's constant, and evaluation of resistance distance. However, existing algorithms for computing $L^\dagger$ are often computationally expensive when dealing with large graphs. To overcome this challenge, we propose novel solutions for approximating $L^\dagger$ by establishing a connection with the inverse of a Laplacian submatrix $L_v$. This submatrix is obtained by removing the $v$-th row and column from the original Laplacian matrix $L$. The key advantage of this connection is that $L_v^{-1}$ exhibits various interesting combinatorial interpretations. We present two innovative interpretations of $L_v^{-1}$ based on spanning trees and loop-erased random walks, which allow us to develop efficient sampling algorithms. Building upon these new theoretical insights, we propose two novel algorithms for efficiently approximating both electrical closeness centrality and Kemeny's constant. We extensively evaluate the performance of our algorithms on five real-life datasets. The results demonstrate that our novel approaches significantly outperform the state-of-the-art methods by several orders of magnitude in terms of both running time and estimation errors for these two graph analysis tasks. To further illustrate the effectiveness of electrical closeness centrality and Kemeny's constant, we present two case studies that showcase the practical applications of these metrics.
In the Minimum Clique Routing Problem on Cycles \textsc{MCRPC} we are given a cycle together with a set of demands (weighted origin-destination pairs) and the goal is to route all the pairs minimizing the maximum weighted clique of the intersection graph induced by the routing. The vertices of this graph are the demands with their corresponding weights and two demands are adjacent when their routes share at least one arc. In this work we are not only interested in the \textsc{MCRPC} but also in two natural subproblems. First, we consider the situation where the demands are disjoint, in the sense that every two demands do not share any of their corresponding ends. Second, we analyze the subproblem where the weights of the routes are all equal. We first show that the problem is NP-complete even in the subproblem of disjoint demands. For the case of arbitrary weights, we exhibit a simple combinatorial 2-approximation algorithm and a $\frac{3}{2}$-approximation algorithm based on rounding a solution of a relaxation of an integer linear programming formulation of our problem. Finally, we give a Fixed Parameter Tractable algorithm for the case of uniform weights, whose parameter is related to the maximum degree of the intersection graph induced by any routing.
We give a poly-time algorithm for the $k$-edge-connected spanning subgraph ($k$-ECSS) problem that returns a solution of cost no greater than the cheapest $(k+10)$-ECSS on the same graph. Our approach enhances the iterative relaxation framework with a new ingredient, which we call ghost values, that allows for high sparsity in intermediate problems. Our guarantees improve upon the best-known approximation factor of $2$ for $k$-ECSS whenever the optimal value of $(k+10)$-ECSS is close to that of $k$-ECSS. This is a property that holds for the closely related problem $k$-edge-connected spanning multi-subgraph ($k$-ECSM), which is identical to $k$-ECSS except edges can be selected multiple times at the same cost. As a consequence, we obtain a $\left(1+O\left(\frac{1}{k}\right)\right)$-approximation for $k$-ECSM, which resolves a conjecture of Pritchard and improves upon a recent $1+O\left(\frac{1}{k}\right)$ approximation of Karlin, Klein, Oveis Gharan, and Zhang. Moreover, we present a matching lower bound for $k$-ECSM, showing that our approximation ratio is tight up to the constant factor in $O\left(\frac{1}{k}\right)$, unless $P=NP$.
We show that the problem of whether a query is equivalent to a query of tree-width $k$ is decidable, for the class of Unions of Conjunctive Regular Path Queries with two-way navigation (UC2RPQs). A previous result by Barcel\'o, Romero, and Vardi [SIAM Journal on Computing, 2016] has shown decidability for the case $k=1$, and here we extend this result showing that decidability in fact holds for any arbitrary $k\geq 1$. The algorithm is in 2ExpSpace, but for the restricted but practically relevant case where all regular expressions of the query are of the form $a^*$ or $(a_1 + \dotsb + a_n)$ we show that the complexity of the problem drops to $\Pi^P_2$. We also investigate the related problem of approximating a UC2RPQ by queries of small tree-width. We exhibit an algorithm which, for any fixed number $k$, builds the maximal under-approximation of tree-width $k$ of a UC2RPQ. The maximal under-approximation of tree-width $k$ of a query $q$ is a query $q'$ of tree-width $k$ which is contained in $q$ in a maximal and unique way, that is, such that for every query $q''$ of tree-width $k$, if $q''$ is contained in $q$ then $q''$ is also contained in $q'$. Our approach is shown to be robust, in the sense that it allows also to test equivalence with queries of a given path-width, it also covers the previously known result for $k=1$, and it allows to test for equivalence of whether a (one-way) UCRPQ is equivalent to a UCRPQ of a given tree-width (or path-width).
In a prophet inequality problem, $n$ independent random variables are presented to a gambler one by one. The gambler decides when to stop the sequence and obtains the most recent value as reward. We evaluate a stopping rule by the worst-case ratio between its expected reward and the expectation of the maximum variable. In the classic setting, the order is fixed, and the optimal ratio is known to be 1/2. Three variants of this problem have been extensively studied: the prophet-secretary model, where variables arrive in uniformly random order; the free-order model, where the gambler chooses the arrival order; and the i.i.d. model, where the distributions are all the same, rendering the arrival order irrelevant. Most of the literature assumes that distributions are known to the gambler. Recent work has considered the question of what is achievable when the gambler has access only to a few samples per distribution. Surprisingly, in the fixed-order case, a single sample from each distribution is enough to approximate the optimal ratio, but this is not the case in any of the three variants. We provide a unified proof that for all three variants of the problem, a constant number of samples (independent of n) for each distribution is good enough to approximate the optimal ratios. Prior to our work, this was known to be the case only in the i.i.d. variant. We complement our result showing that our algorithms can be implemented in polynomial time. A key ingredient in our proof is an existential result based on a minimax argument, which states that there must exist an algorithm that attains the optimal ratio and does not rely on the knowledge of the upper tail of the distributions. A second key ingredient is a refined sample-based version of a decomposition of the instance into "small" and "large" variables, first introduced by Liu et al. [EC'21].
Approaches to recommendation are typically evaluated in one of two ways: (1) via a (simulated) online experiment, often seen as the gold standard, or (2) via some offline evaluation procedure, where the goal is to approximate the outcome of an online experiment. Several offline evaluation metrics have been adopted in the literature, inspired by ranking metrics prevalent in the field of Information Retrieval. (Normalised) Discounted Cumulative Gain (nDCG) is one such metric that has seen widespread adoption in empirical studies, and higher (n)DCG values have been used to present new methods as the state-of-the-art in top-$n$ recommendation for many years. Our work takes a critical look at this approach, and investigates when we can expect such metrics to approximate the gold standard outcome of an online experiment. We formally present the assumptions that are necessary to consider DCG an unbiased estimator of online reward and provide a derivation for this metric from first principles, highlighting where we deviate from its traditional uses in IR. Importantly, we show that normalising the metric renders it inconsistent, in that even when DCG is unbiased, ranking competing methods by their normalised DCG can invert their relative order. Through a correlation analysis between off- and on-line experiments conducted on a large-scale recommendation platform, we show that our unbiased DCG estimates strongly correlate with online reward, even when some of the metric's inherent assumptions are violated. This statement no longer holds for its normalised variant, suggesting that nDCG's practical utility may be limited.
注冊地址： 北京市海淀區羊坊店路18號2幢3層301-191