亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

The One-versus-One (OvO) strategy is an approach of multi-classification models which focuses on training binary classifiers between each pair of classes. While the OvO strategy takes advantage of balanced training data, the classification accuracy is usually hindered by the voting mechanism to combine all binary classifiers. In this paper, a novel OvO multi-classification model incorporating a joint probability measure is proposed under the deep learning framework. In the proposed model, a two-stage algorithm is developed to estimate the class probability from the pairwise binary classifiers. Given the binary classifiers, the pairwise probability estimate is calibrated by a distance measure on the separating feature hyperplane. From that, the class probability of the subject is estimated by solving a joint probability-based distance minimization problem. Numerical experiments in different applications show that the proposed model achieves generally higher classification accuracy than other state-of-the-art models.

Object detection on Lidar point cloud data is a promising technology for autonomous driving and robotics which has seen a significant rise in performance and accuracy during recent years. Particularly uncertainty estimation is a crucial component for down-stream tasks and deep neural networks remain error-prone even for predictions with high confidence. Previously proposed methods for quantifying prediction uncertainty tend to alter the training scheme of the detector or rely on prediction sampling which results in vastly increased inference time. In order to address these two issues, we propose LidarMetaDetect (LMD), a light-weight post-processing scheme for prediction quality estimation. Our method can easily be added to any pre-trained Lidar object detector without altering anything about the base model and is purely based on post-processing, therefore, only leading to a negligible computational overhead. Our experiments show a significant increase of statistical reliability in separating true from false predictions. We propose and evaluate an additional application of our method leading to the detection of annotation errors. Explicit samples and a conservative count of annotation error proposals indicates the viability of our method for large-scale datasets like KITTI and nuScenes. On the widely-used nuScenes test dataset, 43 out of the top 100 proposals of our method indicate, in fact, erroneous annotations.

Event extraction (EE) is a crucial task aiming at extracting events from texts, which includes two subtasks: event detection (ED) and event argument extraction (EAE). In this paper, we check the reliability of EE evaluations and identify three major pitfalls: (1) The data preprocessing discrepancy makes the evaluation results on the same dataset not directly comparable, but the data preprocessing details are not widely noted and specified in papers. (2) The output space discrepancy of different model paradigms makes different-paradigm EE models lack grounds for comparison and also leads to unclear mapping issues between predictions and annotations. (3) The absence of pipeline evaluation of many EAE-only works makes them hard to be directly compared with EE works and may not well reflect the model performance in real-world pipeline scenarios. We demonstrate the significant influence of these pitfalls through comprehensive meta-analyses of recent papers and empirical experiments. To avoid these pitfalls, we suggest a series of remedies, including specifying data preprocessing, standardizing outputs, and providing pipeline evaluation results. To help implement these remedies, we develop a consistent evaluation framework OMNIEVENT, which can be obtained from //github.com/THU-KEG/OmniEvent.

There are well-established methods for identifying the causal effect of a time-varying treatment applied at discrete time points. However, in the real world, many treatments are continuous or have a finer time scale than the one used for measurement or analysis. While researchers have investigated the discrepancies between estimates under varying discretization scales using simulations and empirical data, it is still unclear how the choice of discretization scale affects causal inference. To address this gap, we present a framework to understand how discretization scales impact the properties of causal inferences about the effect of a time-varying treatment. We introduce the concept of "identification bias", which is the difference between the causal estimand for a continuous-time treatment and the purported estimand of a discretized version of the treatment. We show that this bias can persist even with an infinite number of longitudinal treatment-outcome trajectories. We specifically examine the identification problem in a class of linear stochastic continuous-time data-generating processes and demonstrate the identification bias of the g-formula in this context. Our findings indicate that discretization bias can significantly impact empirical analysis, especially when there are limited repeated measurements. Therefore, we recommend that researchers carefully consider the choice of discretization scale and perform sensitivity analysis to address this bias. We also propose a simple and heuristic quantitative measure for sensitivity concerning discretization and suggest that researchers report this measure along with point and interval estimates in their work. By doing so, researchers can better understand and address the potential impact of discretization bias on causal inference.

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exciting progress in acquiring diverse new capabilities through in-context learning, ranging from logical reasoning to code-writing. Robotics researchers have also explored using LLMs to advance the capabilities of robotic control. However, since low-level robot actions are hardware-dependent and underrepresented in LLM training corpora, existing efforts in applying LLMs to robotics have largely treated LLMs as semantic planners or relied on human-engineered control primitives to interface with the robot. On the other hand, reward functions are shown to be flexible representations that can be optimized for control policies to achieve diverse tasks, while their semantic richness makes them suitable to be specified by LLMs. In this work, we introduce a new paradigm that harnesses this realization by utilizing LLMs to define reward parameters that can be optimized and accomplish variety of robotic tasks. Using reward as the intermediate interface generated by LLMs, we can effectively bridge the gap between high-level language instructions or corrections to low-level robot actions. Meanwhile, combining this with a real-time optimizer, MuJoCo MPC, empowers an interactive behavior creation experience where users can immediately observe the results and provide feedback to the system. To systematically evaluate the performance of our proposed method, we designed a total of 17 tasks for a simulated quadruped robot and a dexterous manipulator robot. We demonstrate that our proposed method reliably tackles 90% of the designed tasks, while a baseline using primitive skills as the interface with Code-as-policies achieves 50% of the tasks. We further validated our method on a real robot arm where complex manipulation skills such as non-prehensile pushing emerge through our interactive system.

We consider the problem of estimating a scalar target parameter in the presence of nuisance parameters. Replacing the unknown nuisance parameter with a nonparametric estimator, e.g.,a machine learning (ML) model, is convenient but has shown to be inefficient due to large biases. Modern methods, such as the targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE) and double machine learning (DML), achieve optimal performance under flexible assumptions by harnessing ML estimates while mitigating the plug-in bias. To avoid a sub-optimal bias-variance trade-off, these methods perform a debiasing step of the plug-in pre-estimate. Existing debiasing methods require the influence function of the target parameter as input. However, deriving the IF requires specialized expertise and thus obstructs the adaptation of these methods by practitioners. We propose a novel way to debias plug-in estimators which (i) is efficient, (ii) does not require the IF to be implemented, (iii) is computationally tractable, and therefore can be readily adapted to new estimation problems and automated without analytic derivations by the user. We build on the TMLE framework and update a plug-in estimate with a regularized likelihood maximization step over a nonparametric model constructed with a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS), producing an efficient plug-in estimate for any regular target parameter. Our method, thus, offers the efficiency of competing debiasing techniques without sacrificing the utility of the plug-in approach.

With increasing automation, drivers' role progressively transitions from active operators to passive system supervisors, affecting their behaviour and cognitive processes. This study aims to understand better attention allocation and perceived cognitive load in manual, L2, and L3 driving in a realistic environment. We conducted a test-track experiment with 30 participants. While driving a prototype automated vehicle, participants were exposed to a passive auditory oddball task and their EEG was recorded. We studied the P3a ERP component elicited by novel environmental cues, an index of attention resources used to process the stimuli. The self-reported cognitive load was assessed using the NASA-TLX. Our findings revealed no significant difference in perceived cognitive load between manual and L2 driving, with L3 driving demonstrating a lower self-reported cognitive load. Despite this, P3a mean amplitude was highest during manual driving, indicating greater attention allocation towards processing environmental sounds compared to L2 and L3 driving. We argue that the need to integrate environmental information might be attenuated in L2 and L3 driving. Further empirical evidence is necessary to understand whether the decreased processing of environmental stimuli is due to top-down attention control leading to attention withdrawal or a lack of available resources due to high cognitive load. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first attempt to use the passive oddball paradigm outside the laboratory. The insights of this study have significant implications for automation safety and user interface design.

Latent diffusion models achieve state-of-the-art performance on a variety of generative tasks, such as image synthesis and image editing. However, the robustness of latent diffusion models is not well studied. Previous works only focus on the adversarial attacks against the encoder or the output image under white-box settings, regardless of the denoising process. Therefore, in this paper, we aim to analyze the robustness of latent diffusion models more thoroughly. We first study the influence of the components inside latent diffusion models on their white-box robustness. In addition to white-box scenarios, we evaluate the black-box robustness of latent diffusion models via transfer attacks, where we consider both prompt-transfer and model-transfer settings and possible defense mechanisms. However, all these explorations need a comprehensive benchmark dataset, which is missing in the literature. Therefore, to facilitate the research of the robustness of latent diffusion models, we propose two automatic dataset construction pipelines for two kinds of image editing models and release the whole dataset. Our code and dataset are available at \url{//github.com/jpzhang1810/LDM-Robustness}.

Despite the recent proliferation of spatial audio technologies, the evaluation of spatial quality continues to rely on subjective listening tests, often requiring expert listeners. Based on the duplex theory of spatial hearing, it is possible to construct a signal model for frequency-independent spatial distortion by accounting for inter-channel time and level differences relative to a reference signal. By using a combination of least-square optimization and heuristics, we propose a signal decomposition method to isolate the spatial error from a processed signal. This allows the computation of simple energy-ratio metrics, providing objective measures of spatial and non-spatial signal qualities, with minimal assumption and no dataset dependency. Experiments demonstrate robustness of the method against common signal degradation as introduced by, e.g., audio compression and music source separation. Implementation is available at //github.com/karnwatcharasupat/spauq.

In structure learning, the output is generally a structure that is used as supervision information to achieve good performance. Considering the interpretation of deep learning models has raised extended attention these years, it will be beneficial if we can learn an interpretable structure from deep learning models. In this paper, we focus on Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) whose inner mechanism is still not clearly understood. We find that Finite State Automaton (FSA) that processes sequential data has more interpretable inner mechanism and can be learned from RNNs as the interpretable structure. We propose two methods to learn FSA from RNN based on two different clustering methods. We first give the graphical illustration of FSA for human beings to follow, which shows the interpretability. From the FSA's point of view, we then analyze how the performance of RNNs are affected by the number of gates, as well as the semantic meaning behind the transition of numerical hidden states. Our results suggest that RNNs with simple gated structure such as Minimal Gated Unit (MGU) is more desirable and the transitions in FSA leading to specific classification result are associated with corresponding words which are understandable by human beings.