亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

Dynamic neural networks are a recent technique that promises a remedy for the increasing size of modern deep learning models by dynamically adapting their computational cost to the difficulty of the inputs. In this way, the model can adjust to a limited computational budget. However, the poor quality of uncertainty estimates in deep learning models makes it difficult to distinguish between hard and easy samples. To address this challenge, we present a computationally efficient approach for post-hoc uncertainty quantification in dynamic neural networks. We show that adequately quantifying and accounting for both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty through a probabilistic treatment of the last layers improves the predictive performance and aids decision-making when determining the computational budget. In the experiments, we show improvements on CIFAR-100, ImageNet, and Caltech-256 in terms of accuracy, capturing uncertainty, and calibration error.

Natural gradient descent has a remarkable property that in the small learning rate limit, it displays an invariance with respect to network reparameterizations, leading to robust training behavior even for highly covariant network parameterizations. We show that optimization algorithms with this property can be viewed as discrete approximations of natural transformations from the functor determining an optimizer's state space from the diffeomorphism group if its configuration manifold, to the functor determining that state space's tangent bundle from this group. Algorithms with this property enjoy greater efficiency when used to train poorly parameterized networks, as the network evolution they generate is approximately invariant to network reparameterizations. More specifically, the flow generated by these algorithms in the limit as the learning rate vanishes is invariant under smooth reparameterizations, the respective flows of the parameters being determined by equivariant maps. By casting this property a natural transformation, we allow for generalizations beyond equivariance with respect to group actions; this framework can account for non-invertible maps such as projections, creating a framework for the direct comparison of training behavior across non-isomorphic network architectures, and the formal examination of limiting behavior as network size increases by considering inverse limits of these projections, should they exist. We introduce a simple method of introducing this naturality more generally and examine a number of popular machine learning training algorithms, finding that most are unnatural.

We introduce a \emph{gain function} viewpoint of information leakage by proposing \emph{maximal $g$-leakage}, a rich class of operationally meaningful leakage measures that subsumes recently introduced leakage measures -- {maximal leakage} and {maximal $\alpha$-leakage}. In maximal $g$-leakage, the gain of an adversary in guessing an unknown random variable is measured using a {gain function} applied to the probability of correctly guessing. In particular, maximal $g$-leakage captures the multiplicative increase, upon observing $Y$, in the expected gain of an adversary in guessing a randomized function of $X$, maximized over all such randomized functions. We also consider the scenario where an adversary can make multiple attempts to guess the randomized function of interest. We show that maximal leakage is an upper bound on maximal $g$-leakage under multiple guesses, for any non-negative gain function $g$. We obtain a closed-form expression for maximal $g$-leakage under multiple guesses for a class of concave gain functions. We also study maximal $g$-leakage measure for a specific class of gain functions related to the $\alpha$-loss. In particular, we first completely characterize the minimal expected $\alpha$-loss under multiple guesses and analyze how the corresponding leakage measure is affected with the number of guesses. Finally, we study two variants of maximal $g$-leakage depending on the type of adversary and obtain closed-form expressions for them, which do not depend on the particular gain function considered as long as it satisfies some mild regularity conditions. We do this by developing a variational characterization for the R\'{e}nyi divergence of order infinity which naturally generalizes the definition of pointwise maximal leakage to incorporate arbitrary gain functions.

By allowing users to erase their data's impact on federated learning models, federated unlearning protects users' right to be forgotten and data privacy. Despite a burgeoning body of research on federated unlearning's technical feasibility, there is a paucity of literature investigating the considerations behind users' requests for data revocation. This paper proposes a non-cooperative game framework to study users' data revocation strategies in federated unlearning. We prove the existence of a Nash equilibrium. However, users' best response strategies are coupled via model performance and unlearning costs, which makes the equilibrium computation challenging. We obtain the Nash equilibrium by establishing its equivalence with a much simpler auxiliary optimization problem. We also summarize users' multi-dimensional attributes into a single-dimensional metric and derive the closed-form characterization of an equilibrium, when users' unlearning costs are negligible. Moreover, we compare the cases of allowing and forbidding partial data revocation in federated unlearning. Interestingly, the results reveal that allowing partial revocation does not necessarily increase users' data contributions or payoffs due to the game structure. Additionally, we demonstrate that positive externalities may exist between users' data revocation decisions when users incur unlearning costs, while this is not the case when their unlearning costs are negligible.

Biases in the dataset often enable the model to achieve high performance on in-distribution data, while poorly performing on out-of-distribution data. To mitigate the detrimental effect of the bias on the networks, previous works have proposed debiasing methods that down-weight the biased examples identified by an auxiliary model, which is trained with explicit bias labels. However, finding a type of bias in datasets is a costly process. Therefore, recent studies have attempted to make the auxiliary model biased without the guidance (or annotation) of bias labels, by constraining the model's training environment or the capability of the model itself. Despite the promising debiasing results of recent works, the multi-class learning objective, which has been naively used to train the auxiliary model, may harm the bias mitigation effect due to its regularization effect and competitive nature across classes. As an alternative, we propose a new debiasing framework that introduces binary classifiers between the auxiliary model and the main model, coined bias experts. Specifically, each bias expert is trained on a binary classification task derived from the multi-class classification task via the One-vs-Rest approach. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed strategy improves the bias identification ability of the auxiliary model. Consequently, our debiased model consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art on various challenge datasets.

When optimizing problems with uncertain parameter values in a linear objective, decision-focused learning enables end-to-end learning of these values. We are interested in a stochastic scheduling problem, in which processing times are uncertain, which brings uncertain values in the constraints, and thus repair of an initial schedule may be needed. Historical realizations of the stochastic processing times are available. We show how existing decision-focused learning techniques based on stochastic smoothing can be adapted to this scheduling problem. We include an extensive experimental evaluation to investigate in which situations decision-focused learning outperforms the state of the art for such situations: scenario-based stochastic optimization.

We show that every $n$-vertex triangulation has a connected dominating set of size at most $10n/21$. Equivalently, every $n$ vertex triangulation has a spanning tree with at least $11n/21$ leaves. Prior to the current work, the best known bounds were $n/2$, which follows from work of Albertson, Berman, Hutchinson, and Thomassen (J. Graph Theory \textbf{14}(2):247--258). One immediate consequence of this result is an improved bound for the SEFENOMAP graph drawing problem of Angelini, Evans, Frati, and Gudmundsson (J. Graph Theory \textbf{82}(1):45--64). As a second application, we show that every $n$-vertex planar graph has a one-bend non-crossing drawing in which some set of at least $11n/21$ vertices is drawn on the $x$-axis.

Analyzing observational data from multiple sources can be useful for increasing statistical power to detect a treatment effect; however, practical constraints such as privacy considerations may restrict individual-level information sharing across data sets. This paper develops federated methods that only utilize summary-level information from heterogeneous data sets. Our federated methods provide doubly-robust point estimates of treatment effects as well as variance estimates. We derive the asymptotic distributions of our federated estimators, which are shown to be asymptotically equivalent to the corresponding estimators from the combined, individual-level data. We show that to achieve these properties, federated methods should be adjusted based on conditions such as whether models are correctly specified and stable across heterogeneous data sets.

While existing work in robust deep learning has focused on small pixel-level $\ell_p$ norm-based perturbations, this may not account for perturbations encountered in several real world settings. In many such cases although test data might not be available, broad specifications about the types of perturbations (such as an unknown degree of rotation) may be known. We consider a setup where robustness is expected over an unseen test domain that is not i.i.d. but deviates from the training domain. While this deviation may not be exactly known, its broad characterization is specified a priori, in terms of attributes. We propose an adversarial training approach which learns to generate new samples so as to maximize exposure of the classifier to the attributes-space, without having access to the data from the test domain. Our adversarial training solves a min-max optimization problem, with the inner maximization generating adversarial perturbations, and the outer minimization finding model parameters by optimizing the loss on adversarial perturbations generated from the inner maximization. We demonstrate the applicability of our approach on three types of naturally occurring perturbations -- object-related shifts, geometric transformations, and common image corruptions. Our approach enables deep neural networks to be robust against a wide range of naturally occurring perturbations. We demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed approach by showing the robustness gains of deep neural networks trained using our adversarial training on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and a new variant of the CLEVR dataset.