Most of the optimal guidance problems can be formulated as nonconvex optimization problems, which can be solved indirectly by relaxation, convexification, or linearization. Although these methods are guaranteed to converge to the global optimum of the modified problems, the obtained solution may not guarantee global optimality or even the feasibility of the original nonconvex problems. In this paper, we propose a computational optimal guidance approach that directly handles the nonconvex constraints encountered in formulating the guidance problems. The proposed computational guidance approach alternately solves the least squares problems and projects the solution onto nonconvex feasible sets, which rapidly converges to feasible suboptimal solutions or sometimes to the globally optimal solutions. The proposed algorithm is verified via a series of numerical simulations on impact angle guidance problems under state dependent maneuver vector constraints, and it is demonstrated that the proposed algorithm provides superior guidance performance than conventional techniques.
Characterisations theorems serve as important tools in model theory and can be used to assess and compare the expressive power of temporal languages used for the specification and verification of properties in formal methods. While complete connections have been established for the linear-time case between temporal logics, predicate logics, algebraic models, and automata, the situation in the branching-time case remains considerably more fragmented. In this work, we provide an automata-theoretic characterisation of some important branching-time temporal logics, namely CTL* and ECTL* interpreted on arbitrary-branching trees, by identifying two variants of Hesitant Tree Automata that are proved equivalent to those logics. The characterisations also apply to Monadic Path Logic and the bisimulation-invariant fragment of Monadic Chain Logic, again interpreted over trees. These results widen the characterisation landscape of the branching-time case and solve a forty-year-old open question.
We consider the problem of an autonomous agent equipped with multiple sensors, each with different sensing precision and energy costs. The agent's goal is to explore the environment and gather information subject to its resource constraints in unknown, partially observable environments. The challenge lies in reasoning about the effects of sensing and movement while respecting the agent's resource and dynamic constraints. We formulate the problem as a trajectory optimization problem and solve it using a projection-based trajectory optimization approach where the objective is to reduce the variance of the Gaussian process world belief. Our approach outperforms previous approaches in long horizon trajectories by achieving an overall variance reduction of up to 85% and reducing the root-mean square error in the environment belief by 50%. This approach was developed in support of rover path planning for the NASA VIPER Mission.
Many techniques for automated inference of inductive invariants for distributed protocols have been developed over the past several years, but their performance can still be unpredictable and their failure modes opaque for large-scale verification tasks. In this paper, we present inductive proof slicing, a new automated, compositional technique for inductive invariant inference that scales effectively to large distributed protocol verification tasks. Our technique is built on a core, novel data structure, the inductive proof graph, which explicitly represents the lemma and action dependencies of an inductive invariant and is built incrementally during the inference procedure, backwards from a target safety property. We present an invariant inference algorithm that integrates localized syntax-guided lemma synthesis routines at nodes of this graph, which are accelerated by computation of localized grammar and state variable slices. Additionally, in the case of failure to produce a complete inductive invariant, maintenance of this proof graph structure allows failures to be localized to small sub-components of this graph, enabling fine-grained failure diagnosis and repair by a user. We evaluate our technique on several complex distributed and concurrent protocols, including a large scale specification of the Raft consensus protocol, which is beyond the capabilities of modern distributed protocol verification tools, and also demonstrate how its interpretability features allow effective diagnosis and repair in cases of initial failure.
We introduce the task of human action anomaly detection (HAAD), which aims to identify anomalous motions in an unsupervised manner given only the pre-determined normal category of training action samples. Compared to prior human-related anomaly detection tasks which primarily focus on unusual events from videos, HAAD involves the learning of specific action labels to recognize semantically anomalous human behaviors. To address this task, we propose a normalizing flow (NF)-based detection framework where the sample likelihood is effectively leveraged to indicate anomalies. As action anomalies often occur in some specific body parts, in addition to the full-body action feature learning, we incorporate extra encoding streams into our framework for a finer modeling of body subsets. Our framework is thus multi-level to jointly discover global and local motion anomalies. Furthermore, to show awareness of the potentially jittery data during recording, we resort to discrete cosine transformation by converting the action samples from the temporal to the frequency domain to mitigate the issue of data instability. Extensive experimental results on two human action datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms the baselines formed by adapting state-of-the-art human activity AD approaches to our task of HAAD.
Non-malleable extractors are generalizations and strengthening of standard randomness extractors, that are resilient to adversarial tampering. Such extractors have wide applications in cryptography and explicit construction of extractors. In the well-studied models of two-source and affine non-malleable extractors, the previous best constructions only work for entropy rate $>2/3$ and $1-\gamma$ respectively by Li (FOCS' 23). We present explicit constructions of two-source and affine non-malleable extractors that match the state-of-the-art constructions of standard ones for small entropy. Our main results include two-source and affine non-malleable extractors (over $\mathsf{F}_2$) for sources on $n$ bits with min-entropy $k \ge \log^C n$ and polynomially small error, matching the parameters of standard extractors by Chattopadhyay and Zuckerman (STOC' 16, Annals of Mathematics' 19) and Li (FOCS' 16), as well as those with min-entropy $k = O(\log n)$ and constant error, matching the parameters of standard extractors by Li (FOCS' 23). Our constructions significantly improve previous results, and the parameters (entropy requirement and error) are the best possible without first improving the constructions of standard extractors. In addition, our improved affine non-malleable extractors give strong lower bounds for a certain kind of read-once linear branching programs, recently introduced by Gryaznov, Pudl\'{a}k, and Talebanfard (CCC' 22) as a generalization of several well-studied computational models. These bounds match the previously best-known average-case hardness results given by Chattopadhyay and Liao (CCC' 23) and Li (FOCS' 23), where the branching program size lower bounds are close to optimal, but the explicit functions we use here are different.\ Our results also suggest a possible deeper connection between non-malleable extractors and standard ones.
Test smells can pose difficulties during testing activities, such as poor maintainability, non-deterministic behavior, and incomplete verification. Existing research has extensively addressed test smells in automated software tests but little attention has been given to smells in natural language tests. While some research has identified and catalogued such smells, there is a lack of systematic approaches for their removal. Consequently, there is also a lack of tools to automatically identify and remove natural language test smells. This paper introduces a catalog of transformations designed to remove seven natural language test smells and a companion tool implemented using Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. Our work aims to enhance the quality and reliability of natural language tests during software development. The research employs a two-fold empirical strategy to evaluate its contributions. First, a survey involving 15 software testing professionals assesses the acceptance and usefulness of the catalog's transformations. Second, an empirical study evaluates our tool to remove natural language test smells by analyzing a sample of real-practice tests from the Ubuntu OS. The results indicate that software testing professionals find the transformations valuable. Additionally, the automated tool demonstrates a good level of precision, as evidenced by a F-Measure rate of 83.70%
We study the fully dynamic maximum matching problem. In this problem, the goal is to efficiently maintain an approximate maximum matching of a graph that is subject to edge insertions and deletions. Our focus is particularly on algorithms that maintain the edges of a $(1-\epsilon)$-approximate maximum matching for an arbitrarily small constant $\epsilon > 0$. Until recently, the fastest known algorithm for this problem required $\Theta(n)$ time per update where $n$ is the number of vertices. This bound was slightly improved to $n/(\log^* n)^{\Omega(1)}$ by Assadi, Behnezhad, Khanna, and Li [STOC'23] and very recently to $n/2^{\Omega(\sqrt{\log n})}$ by Liu [ArXiv'24]. Whether this can be improved to $n^{1-\Omega(1)}$ remains a major open problem. In this paper, we present a new algorithm that maintains a $(1-\epsilon)$-approximate maximum matching. The update-time of our algorithm is parametrized based on the density of a certain class of graphs that we call Ordered Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi (ORS) graphs, a generalization of the well-known Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi graphs. While determining the density of ORS (or RS) remains a hard problem in combinatorics, we prove that if the existing constructions of ORS graphs are optimal, then our algorithm runs in $n^{1/2+O(\epsilon)}$ time for any fixed $\epsilon > 0$ which would be significantly faster than existing near-linear in $n$ time algorithms.
Near-field propagation, particularly that enabled by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS), has emerged as a promising research topic in recent years. However, a comprehensive literature review on RIS-based near-field technologies is still lacking. This article aims to fill this gap by providing a brief overview of near-field concepts and a systematic survey of the state-of-the-art RIS-based near-field technologies. The focus is on three key aspects: the construction of ubiquitous near-field wireless propagation environments using RIS, the enabling of new near-field paradigms for 6G networks through RIS, and the challenges faced by RIS-based near-field technologies. This technical review intends to facilitate the development and innovation of RIS-based near-field technologies.
Conventional entity typing approaches are based on independent classification paradigms, which make them difficult to recognize inter-dependent, long-tailed and fine-grained entity types. In this paper, we argue that the implicitly entailed extrinsic and intrinsic dependencies between labels can provide critical knowledge to tackle the above challenges. To this end, we propose \emph{Label Reasoning Network(LRN)}, which sequentially reasons fine-grained entity labels by discovering and exploiting label dependencies knowledge entailed in the data. Specifically, LRN utilizes an auto-regressive network to conduct deductive reasoning and a bipartite attribute graph to conduct inductive reasoning between labels, which can effectively model, learn and reason complex label dependencies in a sequence-to-set, end-to-end manner. Experiments show that LRN achieves the state-of-the-art performance on standard ultra fine-grained entity typing benchmarks, and can also resolve the long tail label problem effectively.
Multi-relation Question Answering is a challenging task, due to the requirement of elaborated analysis on questions and reasoning over multiple fact triples in knowledge base. In this paper, we present a novel model called Interpretable Reasoning Network that employs an interpretable, hop-by-hop reasoning process for question answering. The model dynamically decides which part of an input question should be analyzed at each hop; predicts a relation that corresponds to the current parsed results; utilizes the predicted relation to update the question representation and the state of the reasoning process; and then drives the next-hop reasoning. Experiments show that our model yields state-of-the-art results on two datasets. More interestingly, the model can offer traceable and observable intermediate predictions for reasoning analysis and failure diagnosis, thereby allowing manual manipulation in predicting the final answer.