In the context of humans operating with artificial or autonomous agents in a hybrid team, it is essential to accurately identify when to authorize those team members to perform actions. Given past examples where humans and autonomous systems can either succeed or fail at tasks, we seek to train a delegating manager agent to make delegation decisions with respect to these potential performance deficiencies. Additionally, we cannot always expect the various agents to operate within the same underlying model of the environment. It is possible to encounter cases where the actions and transitions would vary between agents. Therefore, our framework provides a manager model which learns through observations of team performance without restricting agents to matching dynamics. Our results show our manager learns to perform delegation decisions with teams of agents operating under differing representations of the environment, significantly outperforming alternative methods to manage the team.
Chaotic systems make long-horizon forecasts difficult because small perturbations in initial conditions cause trajectories to diverge at an exponential rate. In this setting, neural operators trained to minimize squared error losses, while capable of accurate short-term forecasts, often fail to reproduce statistical or structural properties of the dynamics over longer time horizons and can yield degenerate results. In this paper, we propose an alternative framework designed to preserve invariant measures of chaotic attractors that characterize the time-invariant statistical properties of the dynamics. Specifically, in the multi-environment setting (where each sample trajectory is governed by slightly different dynamics), we consider two novel approaches to training with noisy data. First, we propose a loss based on the optimal transport distance between the observed dynamics and the neural operator outputs. This approach requires expert knowledge of the underlying physics to determine what statistical features should be included in the optimal transport loss. Second, we show that a contrastive learning framework, which does not require any specialized prior knowledge, can preserve statistical properties of the dynamics nearly as well as the optimal transport approach. On a variety of chaotic systems, our method is shown empirically to preserve invariant measures of chaotic attractors.
Our knowledge of the organisation of the human brain at the population-level is yet to translate into power to predict functional differences at the individual-level, limiting clinical applications, and casting doubt on the generalisability of inferred mechanisms. It remains unknown whether the difficulty arises from the absence of individuating biological patterns within the brain, or from limited power to access them with the models and compute at our disposal. Here we comprehensively investigate the resolvability of such patterns with data and compute at unprecedented scale. Across 23810 unique participants from UK Biobank, we systematically evaluate the predictability of 25 individual biological characteristics, from all available combinations of structural and functional neuroimaging data. Over 4526 GPU*hours of computation, we train, optimize, and evaluate out-of-sample 700 individual predictive models, including multilayer perceptrons of demographic, psychological, serological, chronic morbidity, and functional connectivity characteristics, and both uni- and multi-modal 3D convolutional neural network models of macro- and micro-structural brain imaging. We find a marked discrepancy between the high predictability of sex (balanced accuracy 99.7%), age (mean absolute error 2.048 years, R2 0.859), and weight (mean absolute error 2.609Kg, R2 0.625), for which we set new state-of-the-art performance, and the surprisingly low predictability of other characteristics. Neither structural nor functional imaging predicted individual psychology better than the coincidence of common chronic morbidity (p<0.05). Serology predicted common morbidity (p<0.05) and was best predicted by it (p<0.001), followed by structural neuroimaging (p<0.05). Our findings suggest either more informative imaging or more powerful models will be needed to decipher individual level characteristics from the brain.
This abstract presents a scenario for human-robot action in a home setting involving an older adult and a robot. The scenario is designed to explore the envisioned modelling of memory for communication with a socially assistive robots (SAR). The scenario will enable the gathering of data on failures of speech technology and human-robot communication involving shared memory that may occur during daily activities such as a music-listening activity.
Modeling collective motion in multi-agent systems has gained much attention in recent years. In particular, of interest are the conditions under which flocking dynamics emerges. We present a generalization of the multi-agent model of Olfati--Saber with non-linear navigational feedback forces. As opposed to the original model, our model is, in general, not dissipative. This makes obtaining sufficient conditions for flocking challenging due to the absence of an obvious choice of a Lyapunov function. By means of an alternative argument, we show that our model possesses a global attractor when the navigational feedback forces are bounded perturbations of the linear ones. We further demonstrate that, under mild conditions, the dynamics of the group converges to a complete velocity agreement at an exponential rate. We show that the attractor of a dissipative system can contain non-equilibrium solutions. We construct explicit examples of such solutions and obtain conditions under which they cannot exist. In addition, we present a case study of the energy efficiency of our model. We show how non-linear navigational feedback forces, which possess flexibility that linear forces lack, can be used to reduce on-board energy consumption.
One of the most impressive achievements of the AI revolution is the development of large language models that can generate meaningful text and respond to instructions in plain English with no additional training necessary. Here we show that language models can be used as a scientific instrument for studying human memory for meaningful material. We developed a pipeline for designing large scale memory experiments and analyzing the obtained results. We performed online memory experiments with a large number of participants and collected recognition and recall data for narratives of different lengths. We found that both recall and recognition performance scale linearly with narrative length. Furthermore, in order to investigate the role of narrative comprehension in memory, we repeated these experiments using scrambled versions of the presented stories. We found that even though recall performance declined significantly, recognition remained largely unaffected. Interestingly, recalls in this condition seem to follow the original narrative order rather than the scrambled presentation, pointing to a contextual reconstruction of the story in memory.
Despite known differences between reading and listening in the brain, recent work has shown that text-based language models predict both text-evoked and speech-evoked brain activity to an impressive degree. This poses the question of what types of information language models truly predict in the brain. We investigate this question via a direct approach, in which we eliminate information related to specific low-level stimulus features (textual, speech, and visual) in the language model representations, and observe how this intervention affects the alignment with fMRI brain recordings acquired while participants read versus listened to the same naturalistic stories. We further contrast our findings with speech-based language models, which would be expected to predict speech-evoked brain activity better, provided they model language processing in the brain well. Using our direct approach, we find that both text-based and speech-based language models align well with early sensory regions due to shared low-level features. Text-based models continue to align well with later language regions even after removing these features, while, surprisingly, speech-based models lose most of their alignment. These findings suggest that speech-based models can be further improved to better reflect brain-like language processing.
Social behavior, defined as the process by which individuals act and react in response to others, is crucial for the function of societies and holds profound implications for mental health. To fully grasp the intricacies of social behavior and identify potential therapeutic targets for addressing social deficits, it is essential to understand its core principles. Although machine learning algorithms have made it easier to study specific aspects of complex behavior, current methodologies tend to focus primarily on single-animal behavior. In this study, we introduce LISBET (seLf-supervIsed Social BEhavioral Transformer), a model designed to detect and segment social interactions. Our model eliminates the need for feature selection and extensive human annotation by using self-supervised learning to detect and quantify social behaviors from dynamic body parts tracking data. LISBET can be used in hypothesis-driven mode to automate behavior classification using supervised finetuning, and in discovery-driven mode to segment social behavior motifs using unsupervised learning. We found that motifs recognized using the discovery-driven approach not only closely match the human annotations but also correlate with the electrophysiological activity of dopaminergic neurons in the Ventral Tegmental Area (VTA). We hope LISBET will help the community improve our understanding of social behaviors and their neural underpinnings.
Many networks can be characterised by the presence of communities, which are groups of units that are closely linked and can be relevant in understanding the system's overall function. Recently, hypergraphs have emerged as a fundamental tool for modelling systems where interactions are not limited to pairs but may involve an arbitrary number of nodes. Using a dual approach to community detection, in this study we extend the concept of link communities to hypergraphs, allowing us to extract informative clusters of highly related hyperedges. We analyze the dendrograms obtained by applying hierarchical clustering to distance matrices among hyperedges on a variety of real-world data, showing that hyperlink communities naturally highlight the hierarchical and multiscale structure of higher-order networks. Moreover, by using hyperlink communities, we are able to extract overlapping memberships from nodes, overcoming limitations of traditional hard clustering methods. Finally, we introduce higher-order network cartography as a practical tool for categorizing nodes into different structural roles based on their interaction patterns and community participation. This approach helps identify different types of individuals in a variety of real-world social systems. Our work contributes to a better understanding of the structural organization of real-world higher-order systems.
In large-scale systems there are fundamental challenges when centralised techniques are used for task allocation. The number of interactions is limited by resource constraints such as on computation, storage, and network communication. We can increase scalability by implementing the system as a distributed task-allocation system, sharing tasks across many agents. However, this also increases the resource cost of communications and synchronisation, and is difficult to scale. In this paper we present four algorithms to solve these problems. The combination of these algorithms enable each agent to improve their task allocation strategy through reinforcement learning, while changing how much they explore the system in response to how optimal they believe their current strategy is, given their past experience. We focus on distributed agent systems where the agents' behaviours are constrained by resource usage limits, limiting agents to local rather than system-wide knowledge. We evaluate these algorithms in a simulated environment where agents are given a task composed of multiple subtasks that must be allocated to other agents with differing capabilities, to then carry out those tasks. We also simulate real-life system effects such as networking instability. Our solution is shown to solve the task allocation problem to 6.7% of the theoretical optimal within the system configurations considered. It provides 5x better performance recovery over no-knowledge retention approaches when system connectivity is impacted, and is tested against systems up to 100 agents with less than a 9% impact on the algorithms' performance.
Although measuring held-out accuracy has been the primary approach to evaluate generalization, it often overestimates the performance of NLP models, while alternative approaches for evaluating models either focus on individual tasks or on specific behaviors. Inspired by principles of behavioral testing in software engineering, we introduce CheckList, a task-agnostic methodology for testing NLP models. CheckList includes a matrix of general linguistic capabilities and test types that facilitate comprehensive test ideation, as well as a software tool to generate a large and diverse number of test cases quickly. We illustrate the utility of CheckList with tests for three tasks, identifying critical failures in both commercial and state-of-art models. In a user study, a team responsible for a commercial sentiment analysis model found new and actionable bugs in an extensively tested model. In another user study, NLP practitioners with CheckList created twice as many tests, and found almost three times as many bugs as users without it.