Federated optimization (FedOpt), which targets at collaboratively training a learning model across a large number of distributed clients, is vital for federated learning. The primary concerns in FedOpt can be attributed to the model divergence and communication efficiency, which significantly affect the performance. In this paper, we propose a new method, i.e., LoSAC, to learn from heterogeneous distributed data more efficiently. Its key algorithmic insight is to locally update the estimate for the global full gradient after {each} regular local model update. Thus, LoSAC can keep clients' information refreshed in a more compact way. In particular, we have studied the convergence result for LoSAC. Besides, the bonus of LoSAC is the ability to defend the information leakage from the recent technique Deep Leakage Gradients (DLG). Finally, experiments have verified the superiority of LoSAC comparing with state-of-the-art FedOpt algorithms. Specifically, LoSAC significantly improves communication efficiency by more than $100\%$ on average, mitigates the model divergence problem and equips with the defense ability against DLG.
相關內容
The increasing size of data generated by smartphones and IoT devices motivated the development of Federated Learning (FL), a framework for on-device collaborative training of machine learning models. First efforts in FL focused on learning a single global model with good average performance across clients, but the global model may be arbitrarily bad for a given client, due to the inherent heterogeneity of local data distributions. Federated multi-task learning (MTL) approaches can learn personalized models by formulating an opportune penalized optimization problem. The penalization term can capture complex relations among personalized models, but eschews clear statistical assumptions about local data distributions. In this work, we propose to study federated MTL under the flexible assumption that each local data distribution is a mixture of unknown underlying distributions. This assumption encompasses most of the existing personalized FL approaches and leads to federated EM-like algorithms for both client-server and fully decentralized settings. Moreover, it provides a principled way to serve personalized models to clients not seen at training time. The algorithms' convergence is analyzed through a novel federated surrogate optimization framework, which can be of general interest. Experimental results on FL benchmarks show that our approach provides models with higher accuracy and fairness than state-of-the-art methods.
This paper tackles a multi-agent bandit setting where $M$ agents cooperate together to solve the same instance of a $K$-armed stochastic bandit problem. The agents are \textit{heterogeneous}: each agent has limited access to a local subset of arms and the agents are asynchronous with different gaps between decision-making rounds. The goal for each agent is to find its optimal local arm, and agents can cooperate by sharing their observations with others. While cooperation between agents improves the performance of learning, it comes with an additional complexity of communication between agents. For this heterogeneous multi-agent setting, we propose two learning algorithms, \ucbo and \AAE. We prove that both algorithms achieve order-optimal regret, which is $O\left(\sum_{i:\tilde{\Delta}_i>0} \log T/\tilde{\Delta}_i\right)$, where $\tilde{\Delta}_i$ is the minimum suboptimality gap between the reward mean of arm $i$ and any local optimal arm. In addition, a careful selection of the valuable information for cooperation, \AAE achieves a low communication complexity of $O(\log T)$. Last, numerical experiments verify the efficiency of both algorithms.
Federated learning (FL) has emerged as an important machine learning paradigm where a global model is trained based on the private data from distributed clients. However, most of existing FL algorithms cannot guarantee the performance fairness towards different groups because of data distribution shift over groups. In this paper, we formulate the problem of unified group fairness on FL, where the groups can be formed by clients (including existing clients and newly added clients) and sensitive attribute(s). To solve this problem, we first propose a general fair federated framework. Then we construct a unified group fairness risk from the view of federated uncertainty set with theoretical analyses to guarantee unified group fairness on FL. We also develop an efficient federated optimization algorithm named Federated Mirror Descent Ascent with Momentum Acceleration (FMDA-M) with convergence guarantee. We validate the advantages of the FMDA-M algorithm with various kinds of distribution shift settings in experiments, and the results show that FMDA-M algorithm outperforms the existing fair FL algorithms on unified group fairness.
Ensembles are widely used in machine learning and, usually, provide state-of-the-art performance in many prediction tasks. From the very beginning, the diversity of an ensemble has been identified as a key factor for the superior performance of these models. But the exact role that diversity plays in ensemble models is poorly understood, specially in the context of neural networks. In this work, we combine and expand previously published results in a theoretically sound framework that describes the relationship between diversity and ensemble performance for a wide range of ensemble methods. More precisely, we provide sound answers to the following questions: how to measure diversity, how diversity relates to the generalization error of an ensemble, and how diversity is promoted by neural network ensemble algorithms. This analysis covers three widely used loss functions, namely, the squared loss, the cross-entropy loss, and the 0-1 loss; and two widely used model combination strategies, namely, model averaging and weighted majority vote. We empirically validate this theoretical analysis with neural network ensembles.
In this work, we present a federated version of the state-of-the-art Neural Collaborative Filtering (NCF) approach for item recommendations. The system, named FedNCF, enables learning without requiring users to disclose or transmit their raw data. Data localization preserves data privacy and complies with regulations such as the GDPR. Although federated learning enables model training without local data dissemination, the transmission of raw clients' updates raises additional privacy issues. To address this challenge, we incorporate a privacy-preserving aggregation method that satisfies the security requirements against an honest but curious entity. We argue theoretically and experimentally that existing aggregation algorithms are inconsistent with latent factor model updates. We propose an enhancement by decomposing the aggregation step into matrix factorization and neural network-based averaging. Experimental validation shows that FedNCF achieves comparable recommendation quality to the original NCF system, while our proposed aggregation leads to faster convergence compared to existing methods. We investigate the effectiveness of the federated recommender system and evaluate the privacy-preserving mechanism in terms of computational cost.
The difficulty in specifying rewards for many real-world problems has led to an increased focus on learning rewards from human feedback, such as demonstrations. However, there are often many different reward functions that explain the human feedback, leaving agents with uncertainty over what the true reward function is. While most policy optimization approaches handle this uncertainty by optimizing for expected performance, many applications demand risk-averse behavior. We derive a novel policy gradient-style robust optimization approach, PG-BROIL, that optimizes a soft-robust objective that balances expected performance and risk. To the best of our knowledge, PG-BROIL is the first policy optimization algorithm robust to a distribution of reward hypotheses which can scale to continuous MDPs. Results suggest that PG-BROIL can produce a family of behaviors ranging from risk-neutral to risk-averse and outperforms state-of-the-art imitation learning algorithms when learning from ambiguous demonstrations by hedging against uncertainty, rather than seeking to uniquely identify the demonstrator's reward function.
Recent work has proposed stochastic Plackett-Luce (PL) ranking models as a robust choice for optimizing relevance and fairness metrics. Unlike their deterministic counterparts that require heuristic optimization algorithms, PL models are fully differentiable. Theoretically, they can be used to optimize ranking metrics via stochastic gradient descent. However, in practice, the computation of the gradient is infeasible because it requires one to iterate over all possible permutations of items. Consequently, actual applications rely on approximating the gradient via sampling techniques. In this paper, we introduce a novel algorithm: PL-Rank, that estimates the gradient of a PL ranking model w.r.t. both relevance and fairness metrics. Unlike existing approaches that are based on policy gradients, PL-Rank makes use of the specific structure of PL models and ranking metrics. Our experimental analysis shows that PL-Rank has a greater sample-efficiency and is computationally less costly than existing policy gradients, resulting in faster convergence at higher performance. PL-Rank further enables the industry to apply PL models for more relevant and fairer real-world ranking systems.
Fairness has emerged as a critical problem in federated learning (FL). In this work, we identify a cause of unfairness in FL -- \emph{conflicting} gradients with large differences in the magnitudes. To address this issue, we propose the federated fair averaging (FedFV) algorithm to mitigate potential conflicts among clients before averaging their gradients. We first use the cosine similarity to detect gradient conflicts, and then iteratively eliminate such conflicts by modifying both the direction and the magnitude of the gradients. We further show the theoretical foundation of FedFV to mitigate the issue conflicting gradients and converge to Pareto stationary solutions. Extensive experiments on a suite of federated datasets confirm that FedFV compares favorably against state-of-the-art methods in terms of fairness, accuracy and efficiency.
As data are increasingly being stored in different silos and societies becoming more aware of data privacy issues, the traditional centralized training of artificial intelligence (AI) models is facing efficiency and privacy challenges. Recently, federated learning (FL) has emerged as an alternative solution and continue to thrive in this new reality. Existing FL protocol design has been shown to be vulnerable to adversaries within or outside of the system, compromising data privacy and system robustness. Besides training powerful global models, it is of paramount importance to design FL systems that have privacy guarantees and are resistant to different types of adversaries. In this paper, we conduct the first comprehensive survey on this topic. Through a concise introduction to the concept of FL, and a unique taxonomy covering: 1) threat models; 2) poisoning attacks and defenses against robustness; 3) inference attacks and defenses against privacy, we provide an accessible review of this important topic. We highlight the intuitions, key techniques as well as fundamental assumptions adopted by various attacks and defenses. Finally, we discuss promising future research directions towards robust and privacy-preserving federated learning.
Federated learning is a new distributed machine learning framework, where a bunch of heterogeneous clients collaboratively train a model without sharing training data. In this work, we consider a practical and ubiquitous issue in federated learning: intermittent client availability, where the set of eligible clients may change during the training process. Such an intermittent client availability model would significantly deteriorate the performance of the classical Federated Averaging algorithm (FedAvg for short). We propose a simple distributed non-convex optimization algorithm, called Federated Latest Averaging (FedLaAvg for short), which leverages the latest gradients of all clients, even when the clients are not available, to jointly update the global model in each iteration. Our theoretical analysis shows that FedLaAvg attains the convergence rate of $O(1/(N^{1/4} T^{1/2}))$, achieving a sublinear speedup with respect to the total number of clients. We implement and evaluate FedLaAvg with the CIFAR-10 dataset. The evaluation results demonstrate that FedLaAvg indeed reaches a sublinear speedup and achieves 4.23% higher test accuracy than FedAvg.
注冊地址： 北京市海淀區羊坊店路18號2幢3層301-191