We provide new gradient-based methods for efficiently solving a broad class of ill-conditioned optimization problems. We consider the problem of minimizing a function $f : \mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ which is implicitly decomposable as the sum of $m$ unknown non-interacting smooth, strongly convex functions and provide a method which solves this problem with a number of gradient evaluations that scales (up to logarithmic factors) as the product of the square-root of the condition numbers of the components. This complexity bound (which we prove is nearly optimal) can improve almost exponentially on that of accelerated gradient methods, which grow as the square root of the condition number of $f$. Additionally, we provide efficient methods for solving stochastic, quadratic variants of this multiscale optimization problem. Rather than learn the decomposition of $f$ (which would be prohibitively expensive), our methods apply a clean recursive "Big-Step-Little-Step" interleaving of standard methods. The resulting algorithms use $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(d m)$ space, are numerically stable, and open the door to a more fine-grained understanding of the complexity of convex optimization beyond condition number.
We introduce a new class of inverse optimization problems in which an input solution is given together with $k$ linear weight functions, and the goal is to modify the weights by the same deviation vector $p$ so that the input solution becomes optimal with respect to each of them, while minimizing $\|p\|_1$. In particular, we concentrate on three problems with multiple weight functions: the inverse shortest $s$-$t$ path, the inverse bipartite perfect matching, and the inverse arborescence problems. Using LP duality, we give min-max characterizations for the $\ell_1$-norm of an optimal deviation vector. Furthermore, we show that the optimal $p$ is not necessarily integral even when the weight functions are so, therefore computing an optimal solution is significantly more difficult than for the single-weighted case. We also give a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of an optimal deviation vector that changes the values only on the elements of the input solution, thus giving a unified understanding of previous results on arborescences and matchings.
Nesterov's accelerated gradient (AG) is a popular technique to optimize objective functions comprising two components: a convex loss and a penalty function. While AG methods perform well for convex penalties, such as the LASSO, convergence issues may arise when it is applied to nonconvex penalties, such as SCAD. A recent proposal generalizes Nesterov's AG method to the nonconvex setting but has never been applied to sparse statistical learning problems. There are several hyperparameters to be set before running the proposed algorithm. However, there is no explicit rule as to how the hyperparameters should be selected. In this article, we consider the application of this nonconvex AG algorithm to high-dimensional linear and logistic sparse learning problems, and propose a hyperparameter setting based on the complexity upper bound to accelerate convergence. We further establish the rate of convergence and present a simple and useful bound for the damping sequence. Simulation studies show that convergence can be made, on average, considerably faster than that of the conventional ISTA algorithm. Our experiments also show that the proposed method generally outperforms the current state-of-the-art method in terms of signal recovery.
For strongly convex objectives that are smooth, the classical theory of gradient descent ensures linear convergence relative to the number of gradient evaluations. An analogous nonsmooth theory is challenging: even when the objective is smooth at every iterate, the corresponding local models are unstable, and traditional remedies need unpredictably many cutting planes. We instead propose a multipoint generalization of the gradient descent iteration for local optimization. While designed with general objectives in mind, we are motivated by a "max-of-smooth" model that captures subdifferential dimension at optimality. We prove linear convergence when the objective is itself max-of-smooth, and experiments suggest a more general phenomenon.
This paper presents local minimax regret lower bounds for adaptively controlling linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) systems. We consider smoothly parametrized instances and provide an understanding of when logarithmic regret is impossible which is both instance specific and flexible enough to take problem structure into account. This understanding relies on two key notions: That of local-uninformativeness; when the optimal policy does not provide sufficient excitation for identification of the optimal policy, and yields a degenerate Fisher information matrix; and that of information-regret-boundedness, when the small eigenvalues of a policy-dependent information matrix are boundable in terms of the regret of that policy. Combined with a reduction to Bayesian estimation and application of Van Trees' inequality, these two conditions are sufficient for proving regret bounds on order of magnitude $\sqrt{T}$ in the time horizon, $T$. This method yields lower bounds that exhibit tight dimensional dependencies and scale naturally with control-theoretic problem constants. For instance, we are able to prove that systems operating near marginal stability are fundamentally hard to learn to control. We further show that large classes of systems satisfy these conditions, among them any state-feedback system with both $A$- and $B$-matrices unknown. Most importantly, we also establish that a nontrivial class of partially observable systems, essentially those that are over-actuated, satisfy these conditions, thus providing a $\sqrt{T}$ lower bound also valid for partially observable systems. Finally, we turn to two simple examples which demonstrate that our lower bound captures classical control-theoretic intuition: our lower bounds diverge for systems operating near marginal stability or with large filter gain -- these can be arbitrarily hard to (learn to) control.
In the paper, we propose a class of faster adaptive Gradient Descent Ascent (GDA) methods for solving the nonconvex-strongly-concave minimax problems based on unified adaptive matrices, which include almost existing coordinate-wise and global adaptive learning rates. Specifically, we propose a fast Adaptive Gradient Decent Ascent (AdaGDA) method based on the basic momentum technique, which reaches a lower gradient complexity of $O(\kappa^4\epsilon^{-4})$ for finding an $\epsilon$-stationary point without large batches, which improves the results of the existing adaptive GDA methods by a factor of $O(\sqrt{\kappa})$. At the same time, we present an accelerated version of AdaGDA (VR-AdaGDA) method based on the momentum-based variance reduced technique, which achieves a lower gradient complexity of $O(\kappa^{4.5}\epsilon^{-3})$ for finding an $\epsilon$-stationary point without large batches, which improves the results of the existing adaptive GDA methods by a factor of $O(\epsilon^{-1})$. Moreover, we prove that our VR-AdaGDA method reaches the best known gradient complexity of $O(\kappa^{3}\epsilon^{-3})$ with the mini-batch size $O(\kappa^3)$. In particular, we provide an effective convergence analysis framework for our adaptive GDA methods. Some experimental results on policy evaluation and fair classifier tasks demonstrate the efficiency of our algorithms.
The goal of this paper is to reduce the total complexity of gradient-based methods for two classes of problems: affine-constrained composite convex optimization and bilinear saddle-point structured non-smooth convex optimization. Our technique is based on a double-loop inexact accelerated proximal gradient (APG) method for minimizing the summation of a non-smooth but proximable convex function and two smooth convex functions with different smoothness constants and computational costs. Compared to the standard APG method, the inexact APG method can reduce the total computation cost if one smooth component has higher computational cost but a smaller smoothness constant than the other. With this property, the inexact APG method can be applied to approximately solve the subproblems of a proximal augmented Lagrangian method for affine-constrained composite convex optimization and the smooth approximation for bilinear saddle-point structured non-smooth convex optimization, where the smooth function with a smaller smoothness constant has significantly higher computational cost. Thus it can reduce total complexity for finding an approximately optimal/stationary solution. This technique is similar to the gradient sliding technique in the literature. The difference is that our inexact APG method can efficiently stop the inner loop by using a computable condition based on a measure of stationarity violation, while the gradient sliding methods need to pre-specify the number of iterations for the inner loop. Numerical experiments demonstrate significantly higher efficiency of our methods over an optimal primal-dual first-order method and the gradient sliding methods.
Escaping saddle points is a central research topic in nonconvex optimization. In this paper, we propose a simple gradient-based algorithm such that for a smooth function $f\colon\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}$, it outputs an $\epsilon$-approximate second-order stationary point in $\tilde{O}(\log n/\epsilon^{1.75})$ iterations. Compared to the previous state-of-the-art algorithms by Jin et al. with $\tilde{O}((\log n)^{4}/\epsilon^{2})$ or $\tilde{O}((\log n)^{6}/\epsilon^{1.75})$ iterations, our algorithm is polynomially better in terms of $\log n$ and matches their complexities in terms of $1/\epsilon$. For the stochastic setting, our algorithm outputs an $\epsilon$-approximate second-order stationary point in $\tilde{O}((\log n)^{2}/\epsilon^{4})$ iterations. Technically, our main contribution is an idea of implementing a robust Hessian power method using only gradients, which can find negative curvature near saddle points and achieve the polynomial speedup in $\log n$ compared to the perturbed gradient descent methods. Finally, we also perform numerical experiments that support our results.
This work considers the problem of provably optimal reinforcement learning for episodic finite horizon MDPs, i.e. how an agent learns to maximize his/her long term reward in an uncertain environment. The main contribution is in providing a novel algorithm --- Variance-reduced Upper Confidence Q-learning (vUCQ) --- which enjoys a regret bound of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{HSAT} + H^5SA)$, where the $T$ is the number of time steps the agent acts in the MDP, $S$ is the number of states, $A$ is the number of actions, and $H$ is the (episodic) horizon time. This is the first regret bound that is both sub-linear in the model size and asymptotically optimal. The algorithm is sub-linear in that the time to achieve $\epsilon$-average regret for any constant $\epsilon$ is $O(SA)$, which is a number of samples that is far less than that required to learn any non-trivial estimate of the transition model (the transition model is specified by $O(S^2A)$ parameters). The importance of sub-linear algorithms is largely the motivation for algorithms such as $Q$-learning and other "model free" approaches. vUCQ algorithm also enjoys minimax optimal regret in the long run, matching the $\Omega(\sqrt{HSAT})$ lower bound. Variance-reduced Upper Confidence Q-learning (vUCQ) is a successive refinement method in which the algorithm reduces the variance in $Q$-value estimates and couples this estimation scheme with an upper confidence based algorithm. Technically, the coupling of both of these techniques is what leads to the algorithm enjoying both the sub-linear regret property and the asymptotically optimal regret.
This paper presents a safety-aware learning framework that employs an adaptive model learning method together with barrier certificates for systems with possibly nonstationary agent dynamics. To extract the dynamic structure of the model, we use a sparse optimization technique, and the resulting model will be used in combination with control barrier certificates which constrain feedback controllers only when safety is about to be violated. Under some mild assumptions, solutions to the constrained feedback-controller optimization are guaranteed to be globally optimal, and the monotonic improvement of a feedback controller is thus ensured. In addition, we reformulate the (action-)value function approximation to make any kernel-based nonlinear function estimation method applicable. We then employ a state-of-the-art kernel adaptive filtering technique for the (action-)value function approximation. The resulting framework is verified experimentally on a brushbot, whose dynamics is unknown and highly complex.
We develop an approach to risk minimization and stochastic optimization that provides a convex surrogate for variance, allowing near-optimal and computationally efficient trading between approximation and estimation error. Our approach builds off of techniques for distributionally robust optimization and Owen's empirical likelihood, and we provide a number of finite-sample and asymptotic results characterizing the theoretical performance of the estimator. In particular, we show that our procedure comes with certificates of optimality, achieving (in some scenarios) faster rates of convergence than empirical risk minimization by virtue of automatically balancing bias and variance. We give corroborating empirical evidence showing that in practice, the estimator indeed trades between variance and absolute performance on a training sample, improving out-of-sample (test) performance over standard empirical risk minimization for a number of classification problems.