亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

This work introduces a time domain personalized method (pGTFF0) to achieve intelligibility improvement of noisy speech for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) situation. For this proposal, harmonic features estimated from speech frames are considered as center frequencies of Gammatone auditory filterbanks. A gain factor is further applied to the output of the filtered samples. The key goal is the emulation of an external noise filtering tailored for individuals with ASD. A perceptual listening test demonstrates that ASD volunteers attained lower intelligibility rates than Neurotypical (NT). The proposed solution is compared to three competing approaches considering four acoustic noises at different signal-to-noise ratios. Two objective measures (ESTOI and PESQ) are also adopted for evaluation. The experimental results show that the personalized solution outperformed the competing approaches in terms of intelligibility and quality improvement.

Identifying the most suitable variables to represent the state is a fundamental challenge in Reinforcement Learning (RL). These variables must efficiently capture the information necessary for making optimal decisions. In order to address this problem, in this paper, we introduce the Transfer Entropy Redundancy Criterion (TERC), an information-theoretic criterion, which determines if there is \textit{entropy transferred} from state variables to actions during training. We define an algorithm based on TERC that provably excludes variables from the state that have no effect on the final performance of the agent, resulting in more sample efficient learning. Experimental results show that this speed-up is present across three different algorithm classes (represented by tabular Q-learning, Actor-Critic, and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)) in a variety of environments. Furthermore, to highlight the differences between the proposed methodology and the current state-of-the-art feature selection approaches, we present a series of controlled experiments on synthetic data, before generalizing to real-world decision-making tasks. We also introduce a representation of the problem that compactly captures the transfer of information from state variables to actions as Bayesian networks.

We systematically analyze the accuracy of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) in approximating solutions to the critical Surface Quasi-Geostrophic (SQG) equation on two-dimensional periodic boxes. The critical SQG equation involves advection and diffusion described by nonlocal periodic operators, posing challenges for neural network-based methods that do not commonly exhibit periodic boundary conditions. In this paper, we present a novel approximation of these operators using their nonperiodic analogs based on singular integral representation formulas and use it to perform error estimates. This idea can be generalized to a larger class of nonlocal partial differential equations whose solutions satisfy prescribed boundary conditions, thereby initiating a new PINNs theory for equations with nonlocalities.

Mapping out reaction pathways and their corresponding activation barriers is a significant aspect of molecular simulation. Given their inherent complexity and nonlinearity, even generating a initial guess of these paths remains a challenging problem. Presented in this paper is an innovative approach that utilizes neural networks to generate initial guess for these reaction pathways. The proposed method is initiated by inputting the coordinates of the initial state, followed by progressive alterations to its structure. This iterative process culminates in the generation of the approximate representation of the reaction path and the coordinates of the final state. The application of this method extends to complex reaction pathways illustrated by organic reactions. Training was executed on the Transition1x dataset, an organic reaction pathway dataset. The results revealed generation of reactions that bore substantial similarities with the corresponding test data. The method's flexibility allows for reactions to be generated either to conform to predetermined conditions or in a randomized manner.

Compositional generalization is a key ability of humans that enables us to learn new concepts from only a handful examples. Neural machine learning models, including the now ubiquitous Transformers, struggle to generalize in this way, and typically require thousands of examples of a concept during training in order to generalize meaningfully. This difference in ability between humans and artificial neural architectures, motivates this study on a neuro-symbolic architecture called the Compositional Program Generator (CPG). CPG has three key features: \textit{modularity}, \textit{composition}, and \textit{abstraction}, in the form of grammar rules, that enable it to generalize both systematically to new concepts in a few-shot manner, as well as productively by length on various sequence-to-sequence language tasks. For each input, CPG uses a grammar of the input language and a parser to generate a parse in which each grammar rule is assigned its own unique semantic module, a probabilistic copy or substitution program. Instances with the same parse are always processed with the same composed modules, while those with different parses may be processed with different modules. CPG learns parameters for the modules and is able to learn the semantics for new rules and types incrementally, without forgetting or retraining on rules it's already seen. It achieves perfect generalization on both the SCAN and COGS benchmarks using just 14 examples for SCAN and 22 examples for COGS -- state-of-the-art accuracy with a 1000x improvement in sample efficiency.

Recent artificial intelligence (AI) systems have reached milestones in "grand challenges" ranging from Go to protein-folding. The capability to retrieve medical knowledge, reason over it, and answer medical questions comparably to physicians has long been viewed as one such grand challenge. Large language models (LLMs) have catalyzed significant progress in medical question answering; Med-PaLM was the first model to exceed a "passing" score in US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) style questions with a score of 67.2% on the MedQA dataset. However, this and other prior work suggested significant room for improvement, especially when models' answers were compared to clinicians' answers. Here we present Med-PaLM 2, which bridges these gaps by leveraging a combination of base LLM improvements (PaLM 2), medical domain finetuning, and prompting strategies including a novel ensemble refinement approach. Med-PaLM 2 scored up to 86.5% on the MedQA dataset, improving upon Med-PaLM by over 19% and setting a new state-of-the-art. We also observed performance approaching or exceeding state-of-the-art across MedMCQA, PubMedQA, and MMLU clinical topics datasets. We performed detailed human evaluations on long-form questions along multiple axes relevant to clinical applications. In pairwise comparative ranking of 1066 consumer medical questions, physicians preferred Med-PaLM 2 answers to those produced by physicians on eight of nine axes pertaining to clinical utility (p < 0.001). We also observed significant improvements compared to Med-PaLM on every evaluation axis (p < 0.001) on newly introduced datasets of 240 long-form "adversarial" questions to probe LLM limitations. While further studies are necessary to validate the efficacy of these models in real-world settings, these results highlight rapid progress towards physician-level performance in medical question answering.

An in-depth understanding of uncertainty is the first step to making effective decisions under uncertainty. Deep/machine learning (ML/DL) has been hugely leveraged to solve complex problems involved with processing high-dimensional data. However, reasoning and quantifying different types of uncertainties to achieve effective decision-making have been much less explored in ML/DL than in other Artificial Intelligence (AI) domains. In particular, belief/evidence theories have been studied in KRR since the 1960s to reason and measure uncertainties to enhance decision-making effectiveness. We found that only a few studies have leveraged the mature uncertainty research in belief/evidence theories in ML/DL to tackle complex problems under different types of uncertainty. In this survey paper, we discuss several popular belief theories and their core ideas dealing with uncertainty causes and types and quantifying them, along with the discussions of their applicability in ML/DL. In addition, we discuss three main approaches that leverage belief theories in Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), including Evidential DNNs, Fuzzy DNNs, and Rough DNNs, in terms of their uncertainty causes, types, and quantification methods along with their applicability in diverse problem domains. Based on our in-depth survey, we discuss insights, lessons learned, limitations of the current state-of-the-art bridging belief theories and ML/DL, and finally, future research directions.

The military is investigating methods to improve communication and agility in its multi-domain operations (MDO). Nascent popularity of Internet of Things (IoT) has gained traction in public and government domains. Its usage in MDO may revolutionize future battlefields and may enable strategic advantage. While this technology offers leverage to military capabilities, it comes with challenges where one is the uncertainty and associated risk. A key question is how can these uncertainties be addressed. Recently published studies proposed information camouflage to transform information from one data domain to another. As this is comparatively a new approach, we investigate challenges of such transformations and how these associated uncertainties can be detected and addressed, specifically unknown-unknowns to improve decision-making.

Multi-relation Question Answering is a challenging task, due to the requirement of elaborated analysis on questions and reasoning over multiple fact triples in knowledge base. In this paper, we present a novel model called Interpretable Reasoning Network that employs an interpretable, hop-by-hop reasoning process for question answering. The model dynamically decides which part of an input question should be analyzed at each hop; predicts a relation that corresponds to the current parsed results; utilizes the predicted relation to update the question representation and the state of the reasoning process; and then drives the next-hop reasoning. Experiments show that our model yields state-of-the-art results on two datasets. More interestingly, the model can offer traceable and observable intermediate predictions for reasoning analysis and failure diagnosis, thereby allowing manual manipulation in predicting the final answer.