亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

This work establishes rigorous, novel and widely applicable stability guarantees and transferability bounds for graph convolutional networks -- without reference to any underlying limit object or statistical distribution. Crucially, utilized graph-shift operators (GSOs) are not necessarily assumed to be normal, allowing for the treatment of networks on both directed- and for the first time also undirected graphs. Stability to node-level perturbations is related to an 'adequate (spectral) covering' property of the filters in each layer. Stability to edge-level perturbations is related to Lipschitz constants and newly introduced semi-norms of filters. Results on stability to topological perturbations are obtained through recently developed mathematical-physics based tools. As an important and novel example, it is showcased that graph convolutional networks are stable under graph-coarse-graining procedures (replacing strongly-connected sub-graphs by single nodes) precisely if the GSO is the graph Laplacian and filters are regular at infinity. These new theoretical results are supported by corresponding numerical investigations.

Large-scale AI systems that combine search and learning have reached super-human levels of performance in game-playing, but have also been shown to fail in surprising ways. The brittleness of such models limits their efficacy and trustworthiness in real-world deployments. In this work, we systematically study one such algorithm, AlphaZero, and identify two phenomena related to the nature of exploration. First, we find evidence of policy-value misalignment -- for many states, AlphaZero's policy and value predictions contradict each other, revealing a tension between accurate move-selection and value estimation in AlphaZero's objective. Further, we find inconsistency within AlphaZero's value function, which causes it to generalize poorly, despite its policy playing an optimal strategy. From these insights we derive VISA-VIS: a novel method that improves policy-value alignment and value robustness in AlphaZero. Experimentally, we show that our method reduces policy-value misalignment by up to 76%, reduces value generalization error by up to 50%, and reduces average value error by up to 55%.

Dynamical models described by ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are a fundamental tool in the sciences and engineering. Exact reduction aims at producing a lower-dimensional model in which each macro-variable can be directly related to the original variables, and it is thus a natural step towards the model's formal analysis and mechanistic understanding. We present an algorithm which, given a polynomial ODE model, computes a longest possible chain of exact linear reductions of the model such that each reduction refines the previous one, thus giving a user control of the level of detail preserved by the reduction. This significantly generalizes over the existing approaches which compute only the reduction of the lowest dimension subject to an approach-specific constraint. The algorithm reduces finding exact linear reductions to a question about representations of finite-dimensional algebras. We provide an implementation of the algorithm, demonstrate its performance on a set of benchmarks, and illustrate the applicability via case studies. Our implementation is freely available at //github.com/x3042/ExactODEReduction.jl

We present a policy optimization framework in which the learned policy comes with a machine-checkable certificate of adversarial robustness. Our approach, called CAROL, learns a model of the environment. In each learning iteration, it uses the current version of this model and an external abstract interpreter to construct a differentiable signal for provable robustness. This signal is used to guide policy learning, and the abstract interpretation used to construct it directly leads to the robustness certificate returned at convergence. We give a theoretical analysis that bounds the worst-case accumulative reward of CAROL. We also experimentally evaluate CAROL on four MuJoCo environments. On these tasks, which involve continuous state and action spaces, CAROL learns certified policies that have performance comparable to the (non-certified) policies learned using state-of-the-art robust RL methods.

Ensembles of machine learning models have been well established as a powerful method of improving performance over a single model. Traditionally, ensembling algorithms train their base learners independently or sequentially with the goal of optimizing their joint performance. In the case of deep ensembles of neural networks, we are provided with the opportunity to directly optimize the true objective: the joint performance of the ensemble as a whole. Surprisingly, however, directly minimizing the loss of the ensemble appears to rarely be applied in practice. Instead, most previous research trains individual models independently with ensembling performed post hoc. In this work, we show that this is for good reason - joint optimization of ensemble loss results in degenerate behavior. We approach this problem by decomposing the ensemble objective into the strength of the base learners and the diversity between them. We discover that joint optimization results in a phenomenon in which base learners collude to artificially inflate their apparent diversity. This pseudo-diversity fails to generalize beyond the training data, causing a larger generalization gap. We proceed to demonstrate the practical implications of this effect finding that, in some cases, a balance between independent training and joint optimization can improve performance over the former while avoiding the degeneracies of the latter.

The geometric optimisation of crystal structures is a procedure widely used in Chemistry that changes the geometrical placement of the particles inside a structure. It is called structural relaxation and constitutes a local minimization problem with a non-convex objective function whose domain complexity increases along with the number of particles involved. In this work we study the performance of the two most popular first order optimisation methods, Gradient Descent and Conjugate Gradient, in structural relaxation. The respective pseudocodes can be found in Section 6. Although frequently employed, there is a lack of their study in this context from an algorithmic point of view. In order to accurately define the problem, we provide a thorough derivation of all necessary formulae related to the crystal structure energy function and the function's differentiation. We run each algorithm in combination with a constant step size, which provides a benchmark for the methods' analysis and direct comparison. We also design dynamic step size rules and study how these improve the two algorithms' performance. Our results show that there is a trade-off between convergence rate and the possibility of an experiment to succeed, hence we construct a function to assign utility to each method based on our respective preference. The function is built according to a recently introduced model of preference indication concerning algorithms with deadline and their run time. Finally, building on all our insights from the experimental results, we provide algorithmic recipes that best correspond to each of the presented preferences and select one recipe as the optimal for equally weighted preferences.

Topic models and all their variants analyse text by learning meaningful representations through word co-occurrences. As pointed out by Williamson et al. (2010), such models implicitly assume that the probability of a topic to be active and its proportion within each document are positively correlated. This correlation can be strongly detrimental in the case of documents created over time, simply because recent documents are likely better described by new and hence rare topics. In this work we leverage recent advances in neural variational inference and present an alternative neural approach to the dynamic Focused Topic Model. Indeed, we develop a neural model for topic evolution which exploits sequences of Bernoulli random variables in order to track the appearances of topics, thereby decoupling their activities from their proportions. We evaluate our model on three different datasets (the UN general debates, the collection of NeurIPS papers, and the ACL Anthology dataset) and show that it (i) outperforms state-of-the-art topic models in generalization tasks and (ii) performs comparably to them on prediction tasks, while employing roughly the same number of parameters, and converging about two times faster. Source code to reproduce our experiments is available online.

PPO (Proximal Policy Optimization) is a state-of-the-art policy gradient algorithm that has been successfully applied to complex computer games such as Dota 2 and Honor of Kings. In these environments, an agent makes compound actions consisting of multiple sub-actions. PPO uses clipping to restrict policy updates. Although clipping is simple and effective, it is not efficient in its sample use. For compound actions, most PPO implementations consider the joint probability (density) of sub-actions, which means that if the ratio of a sample (state compound-action pair) exceeds the range, the gradient the sample produces is zero. Instead, for each sub-action we calculate the loss separately, which is less prone to clipping during updates thereby making better use of samples. Further, we propose a multi-action mixed loss that combines joint and separate probabilities. We perform experiments in Gym-$\mu$RTS and MuJoCo. Our hybrid model improves performance by more than 50\% in different MuJoCo environments compared to OpenAI's PPO benchmark results. And in Gym-$\mu$RTS, we find the sub-action loss outperforms the standard PPO approach, especially when the clip range is large. Our findings suggest this method can better balance the use-efficiency and quality of samples.

Knowledge graphs represent factual knowledge about the world as relationships between concepts and are critical for intelligent decision making in enterprise applications. New knowledge is inferred from the existing facts in the knowledge graphs by encoding the concepts and relations into low-dimensional feature vector representations. The most effective representations for this task, called Knowledge Graph Embeddings (KGE), are learned through neural network architectures. Due to their impressive predictive performance, they are increasingly used in high-impact domains like healthcare, finance and education. However, are the black-box KGE models adversarially robust for use in domains with high stakes? This thesis argues that state-of-the-art KGE models are vulnerable to data poisoning attacks, that is, their predictive performance can be degraded by systematically crafted perturbations to the training knowledge graph. To support this argument, two novel data poisoning attacks are proposed that craft input deletions or additions at training time to subvert the learned model's performance at inference time. These adversarial attacks target the task of predicting the missing facts in knowledge graphs using KGE models, and the evaluation shows that the simpler attacks are competitive with or outperform the computationally expensive ones. The thesis contributions not only highlight and provide an opportunity to fix the security vulnerabilities of KGE models, but also help to understand the black-box predictive behaviour of KGE models.

Sampling methods (e.g., node-wise, layer-wise, or subgraph) has become an indispensable strategy to speed up training large-scale Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). However, existing sampling methods are mostly based on the graph structural information and ignore the dynamicity of optimization, which leads to high variance in estimating the stochastic gradients. The high variance issue can be very pronounced in extremely large graphs, where it results in slow convergence and poor generalization. In this paper, we theoretically analyze the variance of sampling methods and show that, due to the composite structure of empirical risk, the variance of any sampling method can be decomposed into \textit{embedding approximation variance} in the forward stage and \textit{stochastic gradient variance} in the backward stage that necessities mitigating both types of variance to obtain faster convergence rate. We propose a decoupled variance reduction strategy that employs (approximate) gradient information to adaptively sample nodes with minimal variance, and explicitly reduces the variance introduced by embedding approximation. We show theoretically and empirically that the proposed method, even with smaller mini-batch sizes, enjoys a faster convergence rate and entails a better generalization compared to the existing methods.