亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

We introduce an approach which allows inferring causal relationships between variables for which the time evolution is available. Our method builds on the ideas of Granger Causality and Transfer Entropy, but overcomes most of their limitations. Specifically, our approach tests whether the predictability of a putative driven system Y can be improved by incorporating information from a potential driver system X, without making assumptions on the underlying dynamics and without the need to compute probability densities of the dynamic variables. Causality is assessed by a rigorous variational scheme based on the Information Imbalance of distance ranks, a recently developed statistical test capable of inferring the relative information content of different distance measures. This framework makes causality detection possible even for high-dimensional systems where only few of the variables are known or measured. Benchmark tests on coupled dynamical systems demonstrate that our approach outperforms other model-free causality detection methods, successfully handling both unidirectional and bidirectional couplings, and it is capable of detecting the arrow of time when present. We also show that the method can be used to robustly detect causality in electroencephalography data in humans.

In this short note, we discuss the circumstances that can lead to a failure to observe design order of discretization error convergence in accuracy verification when solving a time-dependent problem. Intuitively, one would expect to observe a design spatial order of accuracy when the discretization error is measured on a series of consistently refined grids after one extremely small time step because the time integration is then nearly exact. However, in reality, one observes one-order lower discretization error convergence than the design order. This loss of accuracy is not necessarily resolved even if the time step is consistently reduced along with the grid refinement. This can cause a serious problem because then one would wind up trying to find a coding error that does not exist. This short note clarifies the mechanism causing this failure to observe a design order of discretization error convergence in accuracy verification when solving time-dependent problems, and provides a guide for avoiding such pitfalls.

Many modern tech companies, such as Google, Uber, and Didi, utilize online experiments (also known as A/B testing) to evaluate new policies against existing ones. While most studies concentrate on average treatment effects, situations with skewed and heavy-tailed outcome distributions may benefit from alternative criteria, such as quantiles. However, assessing dynamic quantile treatment effects (QTE) remains a challenge, particularly when dealing with data from ride-sourcing platforms that involve sequential decision-making across time and space. In this paper, we establish a formal framework to calculate QTE conditional on characteristics independent of the treatment. Under specific model assumptions, we demonstrate that the dynamic conditional QTE (CQTE) equals the sum of individual CQTEs across time, even though the conditional quantile of cumulative rewards may not necessarily equate to the sum of conditional quantiles of individual rewards. This crucial insight significantly streamlines the estimation and inference processes for our target causal estimand. We then introduce two varying coefficient decision process (VCDP) models and devise an innovative method to test the dynamic CQTE. Moreover, we expand our approach to accommodate data from spatiotemporal dependent experiments and examine both conditional quantile direct and indirect effects. To showcase the practical utility of our method, we apply it to three real-world datasets from a ride-sourcing platform. Theoretical findings and comprehensive simulation studies further substantiate our proposal.

We give new bounds for the single-nomination model of impartial selection, a problem proposed by Holzman and Moulin (Econometrica, 2013). A selection mechanism, which may be randomized, selects one individual from a group of $n$ based on nominations among members of the group; a mechanism is impartial if the selection of an individual is independent of nominations cast by that individual, and $\alpha$-optimal if under any circumstance the expected number of nominations received by the selected individual is at least $\alpha$ times that received by any individual. In a many-nominations model, where individuals may cast an arbitrary number of nominations, the so-called permutation mechanism is $1/2$-optimal, and this is best possible. In the single-nomination model, where each individual casts exactly one nomination, the permutation mechanism does better and prior to this work was known to be $67/108$-optimal but no better than $2/3$-optimal. We show that it is in fact $2/3$-optimal for all $n$. This result is obtained via tight bounds on the performance of the mechanism for graphs with maximum degree $\Delta$, for any $\Delta$, which we prove using an adversarial argument. We then show that the permutation mechanism is not best possible; indeed, by combining the permutation mechanism, another mechanism called plurality with runner-up, and some new ideas, $2105/3147$-optimality can be achieved for all $n$. We finally give new upper bounds on $\alpha$ for any $\alpha$-optimal impartial mechanism. They improve on the existing upper bounds for all $n\geq 7$ and imply that no impartial mechanism can be better than $76/105$-optimal for all $n$; they do not preclude the existence of a $(3/4-\varepsilon)$-optimal impartial mechanism for arbitrary $\varepsilon>0$ if $n$ is large.

The imputation of missing values in multivariate time series (MTS) data is critical in ensuring data quality and producing reliable data-driven predictive models. Apart from many statistical approaches, a few recent studies have proposed state-of-the-art deep learning methods to impute missing values in MTS data. However, the evaluation of these deep methods is limited to one or two data sets, low missing rates, and completely random missing value types. This survey performs six data-centric experiments to benchmark state-of-the-art deep imputation methods on five time series health data sets. Our extensive analysis reveals that no single imputation method outperforms the others on all five data sets. The imputation performance depends on data types, individual variable statistics, missing value rates, and types. Deep learning methods that jointly perform cross-sectional (across variables) and longitudinal (across time) imputations of missing values in time series data yield statistically better data quality than traditional imputation methods. Although computationally expensive, deep learning methods are practical given the current availability of high-performance computing resources, especially when data quality and sample size are highly important in healthcare informatics. Our findings highlight the importance of data-centric selection of imputation methods to optimize data-driven predictive models.

We propose a method for estimation and inference for bounds for heterogeneous causal effect parameters in general sample selection models where the treatment can affect whether an outcome is observed and no exclusion restrictions are available. The method provides conditional effect bounds as functions of policy relevant pre-treatment variables. It allows for conducting valid statistical inference on the unidentified conditional effects. We use a flexible debiased/double machine learning approach that can accommodate non-linear functional forms and high-dimensional confounders. Easily verifiable high-level conditions for estimation, misspecification robust confidence intervals, and uniform confidence bands are provided as well. Re-analyzing data from a large scale field experiment on Facebook, we find significant depolarization effects of counter-attitudinal news subscription nudges. The effect bounds are highly heterogeneous and suggest strong depolarization effects for moderates, conservatives, and younger users.

Counterfactual outcome prediction in longitudinal data has recently gained attention due to its potential applications in healthcare and social sciences. In this paper, we explore the use of the state space model, a popular sequence model, for this task. Specifically, we compare the performance of two models: Treatment Effect Neural Controlled Differential Equation (TE-CDE) and structured state space model (S4Model). While TE-CDE uses controlled differential equations to address time-dependent confounding, it suffers from optimization issues and slow training. In contrast, S4Model is more efficient at modeling long-range dependencies and easier to train. We evaluate the models on a simulated lung tumor growth dataset and find that S4Model outperforms TE-CDE with 1.63x reduction in per epoch training time and 10x better normalized mean squared error. Additionally, S4Model is more stable during training and less sensitive to weight initialization than TE-CDE. Our results suggest that the state space model may be a promising approach for counterfactual outcome prediction in longitudinal data, with S4Model offering a more efficient and effective alternative to TE-CDE.

The Fisher information matrix is a quantity of fundamental importance for information geometry and asymptotic statistics. In practice, it is widely used to quickly estimate the expected information available in a data set and guide experimental design choices. In many modern applications, it is intractable to analytically compute the Fisher information and Monte Carlo methods are used instead. The standard Monte Carlo method produces estimates of the Fisher information that can be biased when the Monte-Carlo noise is non-negligible. Most problematic is noise in the derivatives as this leads to an overestimation of the available constraining power, given by the inverse Fisher information. In this work we find another simple estimate that is oppositely biased and produces an underestimate of the constraining power. This estimator can either be used to give approximate bounds on the parameter constraints or can be combined with the standard estimator to give improved, approximately unbiased estimates. Both the alternative and the combined estimators are asymptotically unbiased so can be also used as a convergence check of the standard approach. We discuss potential limitations of these estimators and provide methods to assess their reliability. These methods accelerate the convergence of Fisher forecasts, as unbiased estimates can be achieved with fewer Monte Carlo samples, and so can be used to reduce the simulated data set size by several orders of magnitude.

In large-scale systems there are fundamental challenges when centralised techniques are used for task allocation. The number of interactions is limited by resource constraints such as on computation, storage, and network communication. We can increase scalability by implementing the system as a distributed task-allocation system, sharing tasks across many agents. However, this also increases the resource cost of communications and synchronisation, and is difficult to scale. In this paper we present four algorithms to solve these problems. The combination of these algorithms enable each agent to improve their task allocation strategy through reinforcement learning, while changing how much they explore the system in response to how optimal they believe their current strategy is, given their past experience. We focus on distributed agent systems where the agents' behaviours are constrained by resource usage limits, limiting agents to local rather than system-wide knowledge. We evaluate these algorithms in a simulated environment where agents are given a task composed of multiple subtasks that must be allocated to other agents with differing capabilities, to then carry out those tasks. We also simulate real-life system effects such as networking instability. Our solution is shown to solve the task allocation problem to 6.7% of the theoretical optimal within the system configurations considered. It provides 5x better performance recovery over no-knowledge retention approaches when system connectivity is impacted, and is tested against systems up to 100 agents with less than a 9% impact on the algorithms' performance.

Unsupervised domain adaptation has recently emerged as an effective paradigm for generalizing deep neural networks to new target domains. However, there is still enormous potential to be tapped to reach the fully supervised performance. In this paper, we present a novel active learning strategy to assist knowledge transfer in the target domain, dubbed active domain adaptation. We start from an observation that energy-based models exhibit free energy biases when training (source) and test (target) data come from different distributions. Inspired by this inherent mechanism, we empirically reveal that a simple yet efficient energy-based sampling strategy sheds light on selecting the most valuable target samples than existing approaches requiring particular architectures or computation of the distances. Our algorithm, Energy-based Active Domain Adaptation (EADA), queries groups of targe data that incorporate both domain characteristic and instance uncertainty into every selection round. Meanwhile, by aligning the free energy of target data compact around the source domain via a regularization term, domain gap can be implicitly diminished. Through extensive experiments, we show that EADA surpasses state-of-the-art methods on well-known challenging benchmarks with substantial improvements, making it a useful option in the open world. Code is available at //github.com/BIT-DA/EADA.