亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

For several decades the dominant techniques for integer linear programming have been branching and cutting planes. Recently, several authors have developed core point methods for solving symmetric integer linear programs (ILPs). An integer point is called a core point if its orbit polytope is lattice-free. It has been shown that for symmetric ILPs, optimizing over the set of core points gives the same answer as considering the entire space. Existing core point techniques rely on the number of core points (or equivalence classes) being finite, which requires special symmetry groups. In this paper we develop some new methods for solving symmetric ILPs (based on outer approximations of core points) that do not depend on finiteness but are more efficient if the group has large disjoint cycles in its set of generators.

Formal verification has been proven instrumental to ensure that quantum programs implement their specifications but often requires a significant investment of time and labor. To address this challenge, we present Qafny, an automated proof system designed for verifying quantum programs. At its core, Qafny uses a type-guided quantum proof system that translates quantum operations to classical array operations. By modeling these operations as proof rules within a classical separation logic framework, Qafny provides automated support for the reasoning process that would otherwise be tedious and time-consuming. We prove the soundness and completeness of our proof system and implement a prototype compiler that transforms Qafny programs both into the Dafny programming language and into executable quantum circuits. Using Qafny, we demonstrate how to efficiently verify prominent quantum algorithms, including quantum-walk algorithms, Grover's search algorithm, and Shor's factoring algorithm, with significantly reduced human efforts.

A dynamic mean field theory is developed for finite state and action Bayesian reinforcement learning in the large state space limit. In an analogy with statistical physics, the Bellman equation is studied as a disordered dynamical system; the Markov decision process transition probabilities are interpreted as couplings and the value functions as deterministic spins that evolve dynamically. Thus, the mean-rewards and transition probabilities are considered to be quenched random variables. The theory reveals that, under certain assumptions, the state-action values are statistically independent across state-action pairs in the asymptotic state space limit, and provides the form of the distribution exactly. The results hold in the finite and discounted infinite horizon settings, for both value iteration and policy evaluation. The state-action value statistics can be computed from a set of mean field equations, which we call dynamic mean field programming (DMFP). For policy evaluation the equations are exact. For value iteration, approximate equations are obtained by appealing to extreme value theory or bounds. The result provides analytic insight into the statistical structure of tabular reinforcement learning, for example revealing the conditions under which reinforcement learning is equivalent to a set of independent multi-armed bandit problems.

We provide a semantic characterization of AGM belief contraction based on frames consisting of a Kripke belief relation and a Stalnaker-Lewis selection function. The central idea is as follows. Let K be the initial belief set and K-A be the contraction of K by the formula A; then B belongs to the set K-A if and only if, at the actual state, the agent believes B and believes that if not-A is (were) the case then B is (would be) the case.

A fundamental question asked in modal logic is whether a given theory is consistent. But consistent with what? A typical way to address this question identifies a choice of background knowledge axioms (say, S4, D, etc.) and then shows the assumptions codified by the theory in question to be consistent with those background axioms. But determining the specific choice and division of background axioms is, at least sometimes, little more than tradition. This paper introduces **generic theories** for propositional modal logic to address consistency results in a more robust way. As building blocks for background knowledge, generic theories provide a standard for categorical determinations of consistency. We argue that the results and methods of this paper help to elucidate problems in epistemology and enjoy sufficient scope and power to have purchase on problems bearing on modalities in judgement, inference, and decision making.

This paper introduces a local search method for improving an existing program with respect to a measurable objective. Program Optimization with Locally Improving Search (POLIS) exploits the structure of a program, defined by its lines. POLIS improves a single line of the program while keeping the remaining lines fixed, using existing brute-force synthesis algorithms, and continues iterating until it is unable to improve the program's performance. POLIS was evaluated with a 27-person user study, where participants wrote programs attempting to maximize the score of two single-agent games: Lunar Lander and Highway. POLIS was able to substantially improve the participants' programs with respect to the game scores. A proof-of-concept demonstration on existing Stack Overflow code measures applicability in real-world problems. These results suggest that POLIS could be used as a helpful programming assistant for programming problems with measurable objectives.

Understanding the macroscopic characteristics of biological complexes demands precision and specificity in statistical ensemble modeling. One of the primary challenges in this domain lies in sampling from particular subsets of the state-space, driven either by existing structural knowledge or specific areas of interest within the state-space. We propose a method that enables sampling from distributions that rigorously adhere to arbitrary sets of geometric constraints in Euclidean spaces. This is achieved by integrating a constraint projection operator within the well-regarded architecture of Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models, a framework founded in generative modeling and probabilistic inference. The significance of this work becomes apparent, for instance, in the context of deep learning-based drug design, where it is imperative to maintain specific molecular profile interactions to realize the desired therapeutic outcomes and guarantee safety.

A "dark cloud" hangs over numerical optimization theory for decades, namely, whether an optimization algorithm $O(\log(n))$ iteration complexity exists. "Yes", this paper answers, with a new optimization algorithm and strict theory proof. It starts with box-constrained quadratic programming (Box-QP), and many practical optimization problems fall into Box-QP. General smooth quadratic programming (QP), nonsmooth Lasso, and support vector machine (or regression) can be reformulated as Box-QP via duality theory. It is the first time to present an $O(\log(n))$ iteration complexity QP algorithm, in particular, which behaves like a "direct" method: the required number of iterations is deterministic with exact value $\left\lceil\log\left(\frac{3.125n}{\epsilon}\right)/\log(1.5625)\right\rceil$. This significant breakthrough enables us to transition from the $O(\sqrt{n})$ to the $O(\log(n))$ optimization algorithm, whose amazing scalability is particularly relevant in today's era of big data and artificial intelligence.

The origins of proof-theoretic semantics lie in the question of what constitutes the meaning of the logical connectives and its response: the rules of inference that govern the use of the connective. However, what if we go a step further and ask about the meaning of a proof as a whole? In this paper we address this question and lay out a framework to distinguish sense and denotation of proofs. Two questions are central here. First of all, if we have two (syntactically) different derivations, does this always lead to a difference, firstly, in sense, and secondly, in denotation? The other question is about the relation between different kinds of proof systems (here: natural deduction vs. sequent calculi) with respect to this distinction. Do the different forms of representing a proof necessarily correspond to a difference in how the inferential steps are given? In our framework it will be possible to identify denotation as well as sense of proofs not only within one proof system but also between different kinds of proof systems. Thus, we give an account to distinguish a mere syntactic divergence from a divergence in meaning and a divergence in meaning from a divergence of proof objects analogous to Frege's distinction for singular terms and sentences.

In mapping enterprise applications, data mapping remains a fundamental part of integration development, but its time consuming. An increasing number of applications lack naming standards, and nested field structures further add complexity for the integration developers. Once the mapping is done, data transformation is the next challenge for the users since each application expects data to be in a certain format. Also, while building integration flow, developers need to understand the format of the source and target data field and come up with transformation program that can change data from source to target format. The problem of automatic generation of a transformation program through program synthesis paradigm from some specifications has been studied since the early days of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Programming by Example (PBE) is one such kind of technique that targets automatic inferencing of a computer program to accomplish a format or string conversion task from user-provided input and output samples. To learn the correct intent, a diverse set of samples from the user is required. However, there is a possibility that the user fails to provide a diverse set of samples. This can lead to multiple intents or ambiguity in the input and output samples. Hence, PBE systems can get confused in generating the correct intent program. In this paper, we propose a deep neural network based ambiguity prediction model, which analyzes the input-output strings and maps them to a different set of properties responsible for multiple intent. Users can analyze these properties and accordingly can provide new samples or modify existing samples which can help in building a better PBE system for mapping enterprise applications.