This paper presents a general methodology for deriving information-theoretic generalization bounds for learning algorithms. The main technical tool is a probabilistic decorrelation lemma based on a change of measure and a relaxation of Young's inequality in $L_{\psi_p}$ Orlicz spaces. Using the decorrelation lemma in combination with other techniques, such as symmetrization, couplings, and chaining in the space of probability measures, we obtain new upper bounds on the generalization error, both in expectation and in high probability, and recover as special cases many of the existing generalization bounds, including the ones based on mutual information, conditional mutual information, stochastic chaining, and PAC-Bayes inequalities. In addition, the Fernique-Talagrand upper bound on the expected supremum of a subgaussian process emerges as a special case.
We introduce a general abstract framework for database repairing in which the repair notions are defined using formal logic. We differentiate between integrity constraints and the so-called query constraints. The former are used to model consistency and desirable properties of the data (such as functional dependencies and independencies), while the latter relates two database instances according to their answers for the query constraints. The framework also admits a distinction between hard and soft queries, allowing to preserve the answers of a core set of queries as well as defining a distance between instances based on query answers. We exemplify how various notions of repairs from the literature can be modelled in our unifying framework. Furthermore, we initiate a complexity-theoretic analysis of the problems of consistent query answering, repair computation, and existence of repair within the new framework. We present both coNP- and NP-hard cases that illustrate the interplay between computationally hard problems and more flexible repair notions. We show general upper bounds in NP and the second level of the polynomial hierarchy. Finally, we relate the existence of a repair to model checking of existential second-order logic.
Faithfully summarizing the knowledge encoded by a deep neural network (DNN) into a few symbolic primitive patterns without losing much information represents a core challenge in explainable AI. To this end, Ren et al. (2023c) have derived a series of theorems to prove that the inference score of a DNN can be explained as a small set of interactions between input variables. However, the lack of generalization power makes it still hard to consider such interactions as faithful primitive patterns encoded by the DNN. Therefore, given different DNNs trained for the same task, we develop a new method to extract interactions that are shared by these DNNs. Experiments show that the extracted interactions can better reflect common knowledge shared by different DNNs.
We study the problem of learning unknown parameters in stochastic interacting particle systems with polynomial drift, interaction and diffusion functions from the path of one single particle in the system. Our estimator is obtained by solving a linear system which is constructed by imposing appropriate conditions on the moments of the invariant distribution of the mean field limit and on the quadratic variation of the process. Our approach is easy to implement as it only requires the approximation of the moments via the ergodic theorem and the solution of a low-dimensional linear system. Moreover, we prove that our estimator is asymptotically unbiased in the limits of infinite data and infinite number of particles (mean field limit). In addition, we present several numerical experiments that validate the theoretical analysis and show the effectiveness of our methodology to accurately infer parameters in systems of interacting particles.
This paper aims to front with dimensionality reduction in regression setting when the predictors are a mixture of functional variable and high-dimensional vector. A flexible model, combining both sparse linear ideas together with semiparametrics, is proposed. A wide scope of asymptotic results is provided: this covers as well rates of convergence of the estimators as asymptotic behaviour of the variable selection procedure. Practical issues are analysed through finite sample simulated experiments while an application to Tecator's data illustrates the usefulness of our methodology.
One problem with researching cognitive modeling and reinforcement learning (RL) is that researchers spend too much time on setting up an appropriate computational framework for their experiments. Many open source implementations of current RL algorithms exist, but there is a lack of a modular suite of tools combining different robotic simulators and platforms, data visualization, hyperparameter optimization, and baseline experiments. To address this problem, we present Scilab-RL, a software framework for efficient research in cognitive modeling and reinforcement learning for robotic agents. The framework focuses on goal-conditioned reinforcement learning using Stable Baselines 3 and the OpenAI gym interface. It enables native possibilities for experiment visualizations and hyperparameter optimization. We describe how these features enable researchers to conduct experiments with minimal time effort, thus maximizing research output.
We propose a novel algorithm for the support estimation of partially known Gaussian graphical models that incorporates prior information about the underlying graph. In contrast to classical approaches that provide a point estimate based on a maximum likelihood or a maximum a posteriori criterion using (simple) priors on the precision matrix, we consider a prior on the graph and rely on annealed Langevin diffusion to generate samples from the posterior distribution. Since the Langevin sampler requires access to the score function of the underlying graph prior, we use graph neural networks to effectively estimate the score from a graph dataset (either available beforehand or generated from a known distribution). Numerical experiments demonstrate the benefits of our approach.
We present a pipeline for unbiased and robust multimodal registration of neuroimaging modalities with minimal pre-processing. While typical multimodal studies need to use multiple independent processing pipelines, with diverse options and hyperparameters, we propose a single and structured framework to jointly process different image modalities. The use of state-of-the-art learning-based techniques enables fast inferences, which makes the presented method suitable for large-scale and/or multi-cohort datasets with a diverse number of modalities per session. The pipeline currently works with structural MRI, resting state fMRI and amyloid PET images. We show the predictive power of the derived biomarkers using in a case-control study and study the cross-modal relationship between different image modalities. The code can be found in https: //github.com/acasamitjana/JUMP.
This simulation study evaluates the effectiveness of multiple imputation (MI) techniques for multilevel data. It compares the performance of traditional Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) with tree-based methods such as Chained Random Forests with Predictive Mean Matching and Extreme Gradient Boosting. Adapted versions that include dummy variables for cluster membership are also included for the tree-based methods. Methods are evaluated for coefficient estimation bias, statistical power, and type I error rates on simulated hierarchical data with different cluster sizes (25 and 50) and levels of missingness (10\% and 50\%). Coefficients are estimated using random intercept and random slope models. The results show that while MICE is preferred for accurate rejection rates, Extreme Gradient Boosting is advantageous for reducing bias. Furthermore, the study finds that bias levels are similar across different cluster sizes, but rejection rates tend to be less favorable with fewer clusters (lower power, higher type I error). In addition, the inclusion of cluster dummies in tree-based methods improves estimation for Level 1 variables, but is less effective for Level 2 variables. When data become too complex and MICE is too slow, extreme gradient boosting is a good alternative for hierarchical data. Keywords: Multiple imputation; multi-level data; MICE; missRanger; mixgb
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), rooted in deep learning, have emerged as a promising approach for solving partial differential equations (PDEs). By embedding the physical information described by PDEs into feedforward neural networks, PINNs are trained as surrogate models to approximate solutions without the need for label data. Nevertheless, even though PINNs have shown remarkable performance, they can face difficulties, especially when dealing with equations featuring rapidly changing solutions. These difficulties encompass slow convergence, susceptibility to becoming trapped in local minima, and reduced solution accuracy. To address these issues, we propose a binary structured physics-informed neural network (BsPINN) framework, which employs binary structured neural network (BsNN) as the neural network component. By leveraging a binary structure that reduces inter-neuron connections compared to fully connected neural networks, BsPINNs excel in capturing the local features of solutions more effectively and efficiently. These features are particularly crucial for learning the rapidly changing in the nature of solutions. In a series of numerical experiments solving Burgers equation, Euler equation, Helmholtz equation, and high-dimension Poisson equation, BsPINNs exhibit superior convergence speed and heightened accuracy compared to PINNs. From these experiments, we discover that BsPINNs resolve the issues caused by increased hidden layers in PINNs resulting in over-smoothing, and prevent the decline in accuracy due to non-smoothness of PDEs solutions.
We derive information-theoretic generalization bounds for supervised learning algorithms based on the information contained in predictions rather than in the output of the training algorithm. These bounds improve over the existing information-theoretic bounds, are applicable to a wider range of algorithms, and solve two key challenges: (a) they give meaningful results for deterministic algorithms and (b) they are significantly easier to estimate. We show experimentally that the proposed bounds closely follow the generalization gap in practical scenarios for deep learning.