We present an iterative framework to improve the amortized approximations of posterior distributions in the context of Bayesian inverse problems, which is inspired by loop-unrolled gradient descent methods and is theoretically grounded in maximally informative summary statistics. Amortized variational inference is restricted by the expressive power of the chosen variational distribution and the availability of training data in the form of joint data and parameter samples, which often lead to approximation errors such as the amortization gap. To address this issue, we propose an iterative framework that refines the current amortized posterior approximation at each step. Our approach involves alternating between two steps: (1) constructing a training dataset consisting of pairs of summarized data residuals and parameters, where the summarized data residual is generated using a gradient-based summary statistic, and (2) training a conditional generative model -- a normalizing flow in our examples -- on this dataset to obtain a probabilistic update of the unknown parameter. This procedure leads to iterative refinement of the amortized posterior approximations without the need for extra training data. We validate our method in a controlled setting by applying it to a stylized problem, and observe improved posterior approximations with each iteration. Additionally, we showcase the capability of our method in tackling realistically sized problems by applying it to transcranial ultrasound, a high-dimensional, nonlinear inverse problem governed by wave physics, and observe enhanced posterior quality through better image reconstruction with the posterior mean.
相關內容
Statistical machine learning methods often face the challenge of limited data available from the population of interest. One remedy is to leverage data from auxiliary source populations, which share some conditional distributions or are linked in other ways with the target domain. Techniques leveraging such \emph{dataset shift} conditions are known as \emph{domain adaptation} or \emph{transfer learning}. Despite extensive literature on dataset shift, limited works address how to efficiently use the auxiliary populations to improve the accuracy of risk evaluation for a given machine learning task in the target population. In this paper, we study the general problem of efficiently estimating target population risk under various dataset shift conditions, leveraging semiparametric efficiency theory. We consider a general class of dataset shift conditions, which includes three popular conditions -- covariate, label and concept shift -- as special cases. We allow for partially non-overlapping support between the source and target populations. We develop efficient and multiply robust estimators along with a straightforward specification test of these dataset shift conditions. We also derive efficiency bounds for two other dataset shift conditions, posterior drift and location-scale shift. Simulation studies support the efficiency gains due to leveraging plausible dataset shift conditions.
Consider the family of power divergence statistics based on $n$ trials, each leading to one of $r$ possible outcomes. This includes the log-likelihood ratio and Pearson's statistic as important special cases. It is known that in certain regimes (e.g., when $r$ is of order $n^2$ and the allocation is asymptotically uniform as $n\to\infty$) the power divergence statistic converges in distribution to a linear transformation of a Poisson random variable. We establish explicit error bounds in the Kolmogorov (or uniform) metric to complement this convergence result, which may be applied for any values of $n$, $r$ and the index parameter $\lambda$ for which such a finite-sample bound is meaningful. We further use this Poisson approximation result to derive error bounds in Gaussian approximation of the power divergence statistics.
The $L_{\infty}$ star discrepancy is a measure for the regularity of a finite set of points taken from $[0,1)^d$. Low discrepancy point sets are highly relevant for Quasi-Monte Carlo methods in numerical integration and several other applications. Unfortunately, computing the $L_{\infty}$ star discrepancy of a given point set is known to be a hard problem, with the best exact algorithms falling short for even moderate dimensions around 8. However, despite the difficulty of finding the global maximum that defines the $L_{\infty}$ star discrepancy of the set, local evaluations at selected points are inexpensive. This makes the problem tractable by black-box optimization approaches. In this work we compare 8 popular numerical black-box optimization algorithms on the $L_{\infty}$ star discrepancy computation problem, using a wide set of instances in dimensions 2 to 15. We show that all used optimizers perform very badly on a large majority of the instances and that in many cases random search outperforms even the more sophisticated solvers. We suspect that state-of-the-art numerical black-box optimization techniques fail to capture the global structure of the problem, an important shortcoming that may guide their future development. We also provide a parallel implementation of the best-known algorithm to compute the discrepancy.
Models with intractable normalizing functions have numerous applications. Because the normalizing constants are functions of the parameters of interest, standard Markov chain Monte Carlo cannot be used for Bayesian inference for these models. A number of algorithms have been developed for such models. Some have the posterior distribution as their asymptotic distribution. Other ``asymptotically inexact'' algorithms do not possess this property. There is limited guidance for evaluating approximations based on these algorithms. Hence it is very hard to tune them. We propose two new diagnostics that address these problems for intractable normalizing function models. Our first diagnostic, inspired by the second Bartlett identity, is in principle broadly applicable to Monte Carlo approximations beyond the normalizing function problem. We develop an approximate version of this diagnostic that is applicable to intractable normalizing function problems. Our second diagnostic is a Monte Carlo approximation to a kernel Stein discrepancy-based diagnostic introduced by Gorham and Mackey (2017). We provide theoretical justification for our methods and apply them to several algorithms in challenging simulated and real data examples including an Ising model, an exponential random graph model, and a Conway--Maxwell--Poisson regression model, obtaining interesting insights about the algorithms in these contexts.
We prove the convergence of an incremental projection numerical scheme for the time-dependent incompressible Navier--Stokes equations, without any regularity assumption on the weak solution. The velocity and the pressure are discretised in conforming spaces, whose the compatibility is ensured by the existence of an interpolator for regular functions which preserves approximate divergence free properties. Owing to a priori estimates, we get the existence and uniqueness of the discrete approximation. Compactness properties are then proved, relying on a Lions-like lemma for time translate estimates. It is then possible to show the convergence of the approximate solution to a weak solution of the problem. The construction of the interpolator is detailed in the case of the lowest degree Taylor-Hood finite element.
Our goal is to produce methods for observational causal inference that are auditable, easy to troubleshoot, accurate for treatment effect estimation, and scalable to high-dimensional data. We describe a general framework called Model-to-Match that achieves these goals by (i) learning a distance metric via outcome modeling, (ii) creating matched groups using the distance metric, and (iii) using the matched groups to estimate treatment effects. Model-to-Match uses variable importance measurements to construct a distance metric, making it a flexible framework that can be adapted to various applications. Concentrating on the scalability of the problem in the number of potential confounders, we operationalize the Model-to-Match framework with LASSO. We derive performance guarantees for settings where LASSO outcome modeling consistently identifies all confounders (importantly without requiring the linear model to be correctly specified). We also provide experimental results demonstrating the method's auditability, accuracy, and scalability as well as extensions to more general nonparametric outcome modeling.
The last decade has seen many attempts to generalise the definition of modes, or MAP estimators, of a probability distribution $\mu$ on a space $X$ to the case that $\mu$ has no continuous Lebesgue density, and in particular to infinite-dimensional Banach and Hilbert spaces $X$. This paper examines the properties of and connections among these definitions. We construct a systematic taxonomy -- or `periodic table' -- of modes that includes the established notions as well as large hitherto-unexplored classes. We establish implications between these definitions and provide counterexamples to distinguish them. We also distinguish those definitions that are merely `grammatically correct' from those that are `meaningful' in the sense of satisfying certain `common-sense' axioms for a mode, among them the correct handling of discrete measures and those with continuous Lebesgue densities. However, despite there being 17 such `meaningful' definitions of mode, we show that none of them satisfy the `merging modes property', under which the modes of $\mu|_{A}$, $\mu|_{B}$ and $\mu|_{A \cup B}$ enjoy a straightforward relationship for open, positive-mass $A,B \subseteq X$.
Partial orders are a natural model for the social hierarchies that may constrain "queue-like" rank-order data. However, the computational cost of counting the linear extensions of a general partial order on a ground set with more than a few tens of elements is prohibitive. Vertex-series-parallel partial orders (VSPs) are a subclass of partial orders which admit rapid counting and represent the sorts of relations we expect to see in a social hierarchy. However, no Bayesian analysis of VSPs has been given to date. We construct a marginally consistent family of priors over VSPs with a parameter controlling the prior distribution over VSP depth. The prior for VSPs is given in closed form. We extend an existing observation model for queue-like rank-order data to represent noise in our data and carry out Bayesian inference on "Royal Acta" data and Formula 1 race data. Model comparison shows our model is a better fit to the data than Plackett-Luce mixtures, Mallows mixtures, and "bucket order" models and competitive with more complex models fitting general partial orders.
Suppose we are given access to $n$ independent samples from distribution $\mu$ and we wish to output one of them with the goal of making the output distributed as close as possible to a target distribution $\nu$. In this work we show that the optimal total variation distance as a function of $n$ is given by $\tilde\Theta(\frac{D}{f'(n)})$ over the class of all pairs $\nu,\mu$ with a bounded $f$-divergence $D_f(\nu\|\mu)\leq D$. Previously, this question was studied only for the case when the Radon-Nikodym derivative of $\nu$ with respect to $\mu$ is uniformly bounded. We then consider an application in the seemingly very different field of smoothed online learning, where we show that recent results on the minimax regret and the regret of oracle-efficient algorithms still hold even under relaxed constraints on the adversary (to have bounded $f$-divergence, as opposed to bounded Radon-Nikodym derivative). Finally, we also study efficacy of importance sampling for mean estimates uniform over a function class and compare importance sampling with rejection sampling.
As soon as abstract mathematical computations were adapted to computation on digital computers, the problem of efficient representation, manipulation, and communication of the numerical values in those computations arose. Strongly related to the problem of numerical representation is the problem of quantization: in what manner should a set of continuous real-valued numbers be distributed over a fixed discrete set of numbers to minimize the number of bits required and also to maximize the accuracy of the attendant computations? This perennial problem of quantization is particularly relevant whenever memory and/or computational resources are severely restricted, and it has come to the forefront in recent years due to the remarkable performance of Neural Network models in computer vision, natural language processing, and related areas. Moving from floating-point representations to low-precision fixed integer values represented in four bits or less holds the potential to reduce the memory footprint and latency by a factor of 16x; and, in fact, reductions of 4x to 8x are often realized in practice in these applications. Thus, it is not surprising that quantization has emerged recently as an important and very active sub-area of research in the efficient implementation of computations associated with Neural Networks. In this article, we survey approaches to the problem of quantizing the numerical values in deep Neural Network computations, covering the advantages/disadvantages of current methods. With this survey and its organization, we hope to have presented a useful snapshot of the current research in quantization for Neural Networks and to have given an intelligent organization to ease the evaluation of future research in this area.
注冊地址： 北京市海淀區羊坊店路18號2幢3層301-191