亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

We analyze to what extent final users can infer information about the level of protection of their data when the data obfuscation mechanism is a priori unknown to them (the so-called ''black-box'' scenario). In particular, we delve into the investigation of two notions of local differential privacy (LDP), namely {\epsilon}-LDP and R\'enyi LDP. On one hand, we prove that, without any assumption on the underlying distributions, it is not possible to have an algorithm able to infer the level of data protection with provable guarantees; this result also holds for the central versions of the two notions of DP considered. On the other hand, we demonstrate that, under reasonable assumptions (namely, Lipschitzness of the involved densities on a closed interval), such guarantees exist and can be achieved by a simple histogram-based estimator. We validate our results experimentally and we note that, on a particularly well-behaved distribution (namely, the Laplace noise), our method gives even better results than expected, in the sense that in practice the number of samples needed to achieve the desired confidence is smaller than the theoretical bound, and the estimation of {\epsilon} is more precise than predicted.

Epidemiologic screening programs often make use of tests with small, but non-zero probabilities of misdiagnosis. In this article, we assume the target population is finite with a fixed number of true cases, and that we apply an imperfect test with known sensitivity and specificity to a sample of individuals from the population. In this setting, we propose an enhanced inferential approach for use in conjunction with sampling-based bias-corrected prevalence estimation. While ignoring the finite nature of the population can yield markedly conservative estimates, direct application of a standard finite population correction (FPC) conversely leads to underestimation of variance. We uncover a way to leverage the typical FPC indirectly toward valid statistical inference. In particular, we derive a readily estimable extra variance component induced by misclassification in this specific but arguably common diagnostic testing scenario. Our approach yields a standard error estimate that properly captures the sampling variability of the usual bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of disease prevalence. Finally, we develop an adapted Bayesian credible interval for the true prevalence that offers improved frequentist properties (i.e., coverage and width) relative to a Wald-type confidence interval. We report the simulation results to demonstrate the enhanced performance of the proposed inferential methods.

Bayesian dynamic modeling and forecasting is developed in the setting of sequential time series analysis for causal inference. Causal evaluation of sequentially observed time series data from control and treated units focuses on the impacts of interventions using synthetic control constructs. Methodological contributions include the development of multivariate dynamic models for time-varying effects across multiple treated units and explicit foci on sequential learning of effects of interventions. Analysis explores the utility of dimension reduction of multiple potential synthetic control variables. These methodological advances are evaluated in a detailed case study in commercial forecasting. This involves in-study evaluation of interventions in a supermarket promotions experiment, with coupled predictive analyses in selected regions of a large-scale commercial system. Generalization of causal predictive inferences from experimental settings to broader populations is a central concern, and one that can be impacted by cross-series dependencies.

Selecting a suitable training dataset is crucial for both general-domain (e.g., GPT-3) and domain-specific (e.g., Codex) language models (LMs). We formalize this data selection problem as selecting a subset of a large raw unlabeled dataset to match a desired target distribution, given some unlabeled target samples. Due to the large scale and dimensionality of the raw text data, existing methods use simple heuristics to select data that are similar to a high-quality reference corpus (e.g., Wikipedia), or leverage experts to manually curate data. Instead, we extend the classic importance resampling approach used in low-dimensions for LM data selection. Crucially, we work in a reduced feature space to make importance weight estimation tractable over the space of text. To determine an appropriate feature space, we first show that KL reduction, a data metric that measures the proximity between selected data and the target in a feature space, has high correlation with average accuracy on 8 downstream tasks (r=0.89) when computed with simple n-gram features. From this observation, we present Data Selection with Importance Resampling (DSIR), an efficient and scalable algorithm that estimates importance weights in a reduced feature space (e.g., n-gram features in our instantiation) and selects data with importance resampling according to these weights. When training general-domain models (target is Wikipedia + books), DSIR improves over random selection and heuristic filtering baselines by 2--2.5% on the GLUE benchmark. When performing continued pretraining towards a specific domain, DSIR performs comparably to expert curated data across 8 target distributions.

The Fisher information matrix (FIM) is a key quantity in statistics as it is required for example for evaluating asymptotic precisions of parameter estimates, for computing test statistics or asymptotic distributions in statistical testing, for evaluating post model selection inference results or optimality criteria in experimental designs. However its exact computation is often not trivial. In particular in many latent variable models, it is intricated due to the presence of unobserved variables. Therefore the observed FIM is usually considered in this context to estimate the FIM. Several methods have been proposed to approximate the observed FIM when it can not be evaluated analytically. Among the most frequently used approaches are Monte-Carlo methods or iterative algorithms derived from the missing information principle. All these methods require to compute second derivatives of the complete data log-likelihood which leads to some disadvantages from a computational point of view. In this paper, we present a new approach to estimate the FIM in latent variable model. The advantage of our method is that only the first derivatives of the log-likelihood is needed, contrary to other approaches based on the observed FIM. Indeed we consider the empirical estimate of the covariance matrix of the score. We prove that this estimate of the Fisher information matrix is unbiased, consistent and asymptotically Gaussian. Moreover we highlight that none of both estimates is better than the other in terms of asymptotic covariance matrix. When the proposed estimate can not be directly analytically evaluated, we present a stochastic approximation estimation algorithm to compute it. This algorithm provides this estimate of the FIM as a by-product of the parameter estimates. We emphasize that the proposed algorithm only requires to compute the first derivatives of the complete data log-likelihood with respect to the parameters. We prove that the estimation algorithm is consistent and asymptotically Gaussian when the number of iterations goes to infinity. We evaluate the finite sample size properties of the proposed estimate and of the observed FIM through simulation studies in linear mixed effects models and mixture models. We also investigate the convergence properties of the estimation algorithm in non linear mixed effects models. We compare the performances of the proposed algorithm to those of other existing methods.

To increase brand awareness, many advertisers conclude contracts with advertising platforms to purchase traffic and then deliver advertisements to target audiences. In a whole delivery period, advertisers usually desire a certain impression count for the ads, and they also expect that the delivery performance is as good as possible (e.g., obtaining high click-through rate). Advertising platforms employ pacing algorithms to satisfy the demands via adjusting the selection probabilities to traffic requests in real-time. However, the delivery procedure is also affected by the strategies from publishers, which cannot be controlled by advertising platforms. Preloading is a widely used strategy for many types of ads (e.g., video ads) to make sure that the response time for displaying after a traffic request is legitimate, which results in delayed impression phenomenon. Traditional pacing algorithms cannot handle the preloading nature well because they rely on immediate feedback signals, and may fail to guarantee the demands from advertisers. In this paper, we focus on a new research problem of impression pacing for preloaded ads, and propose a Reinforcement Learning To Pace framework RLTP. It learns a pacing agent that sequentially produces selection probabilities in the whole delivery period. To jointly optimize the two objectives of impression count and delivery performance, RLTP employs tailored reward estimator to satisfy the guaranteed impression count, penalize the over-delivery and maximize the traffic value. Experiments on large-scale industrial datasets verify that RLTP outperforms baseline pacing algorithms by a large margin. We have deployed the RLTP framework online to our advertising platform, and results show that it achieves significant uplift to core metrics including delivery completion rate and click-through rate.

Model compression can significantly reduce the sizes of deep neural network (DNN) models, and thus facilitates the dissemination of sophisticated, sizable DNN models, especially for their deployment on mobile or embedded devices. However, the prediction results of compressed models may deviate from those of their original models. To help developers thoroughly understand the impact of model compression, it is essential to test these models to find those deviated behaviors before dissemination. However, this is a non-trivial task because the architectures and gradients of compressed models are usually not available. To this end, we propose DFLARE, a novel, search-based, black-box testing technique to automatically find triggering inputs that result in deviated behaviors in image classification tasks. DFLARE iteratively applies a series of mutation operations to a given seed image, until a triggering input is found. For better efficacy and efficiency, DFLARE models the search problem as Markov Chains and leverages the Metropolis-Hasting algorithm to guide the selection of mutation operators in each iteration. Further, DFLARE utilizes a novel fitness function to prioritize the mutated inputs that either cause large differences between two models' outputs, or trigger previously unobserved models' probability vectors. We evaluated DFLARE on 21 compressed models for image classification tasks with three datasets. The results show that DFLARE outperforms the baseline in terms of efficacy and efficiency. We also demonstrated that the triggering inputs found by DFLARE can be used to repair up to 48.48% deviated behaviors in image classification tasks and further decrease the effectiveness of DFLARE on the repaired models.

The ability to interpret machine learning models has become increasingly important as their usage in data science continues to rise. Most current interpretability methods are optimized to work on either (\textit{i}) a global scale, where the goal is to rank features based on their contributions to overall variation in an observed population, or (\textit{ii}) the local level, which aims to detail on how important a feature is to a particular individual in the dataset. In this work, we present the ``GlObal And Local Score'' (GOALS) operator: a simple \textit{post hoc} approach to simultaneously assess local and global feature variable importance in nonlinear models. Motivated by problems in statistical genetics, we demonstrate our approach using Gaussian process regression where understanding how genetic markers affect trait architecture both among individuals and across populations is of high interest. With detailed simulations and real data analyses, we illustrate the flexible and efficient utility of GOALS over state-of-the-art variable importance strategies.

The impact of player age on performance has received attention across sport. Most research has focused on the performance of players at each age, ignoring the reality that age likewise influences which players receive opportunities to perform. Our manuscript makes two contributions. First, we highlight how selection bias is linked to both (i) which players receive opportunity to perform in sport, and (ii) at which ages we observe these players perform. This approach is used to generate underlying distributions of how players move in and out of sport organizations. Second, motivated by methods for missing data, we propose novel estimation methods of age curves by using both observed and unobserved (imputed) data. We use simulations to compare several comparative approaches for estimating aging curves. Imputation-based methods, as well as models that account for individual player skill, tend to generate lower RMSE and age curve shapes that better match the truth. We implement our approach using data from the National Hockey League.

With continuous outcomes, the average causal effect is typically defined using a contrast of expected potential outcomes. However, in the presence of skewed outcome data, the expectation may no longer be meaningful. In practice the typical approach is to either "ignore or transform" - ignore the skewness altogether or transform the outcome to obtain a more symmetric distribution, although neither approach is entirely satisfactory. Alternatively the causal effect can be redefined as a contrast of median potential outcomes, yet discussion of confounding-adjustment methods to estimate this parameter is limited. In this study we described and compared confounding-adjustment methods to address this gap. The methods considered were multivariable quantile regression, an inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimator, weighted quantile regression and two little-known implementations of g-computation for this problem. Motivated by a cohort investigation in the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, we conducted a simulation study that found the IPW estimator, weighted quantile regression and g-computation implementations minimised bias when the relevant models were correctly specified, with g-computation additionally minimising the variance. These methods provide appealing alternatives to the common "ignore or transform" approach and multivariable quantile regression, enhancing our capability to obtain meaningful causal effect estimates with skewed outcome data.