Residual connections have been proposed as architecture-based inductive bias to mitigate the problem of exploding and vanishing gradients and increase task performance in both feed-forward and recurrent networks (RNNs) when trained with the backpropagation algorithm. Yet, little is known about how residual connections in RNNs influence their dynamics and fading memory properties. Here, we introduce weakly coupled residual recurrent networks (WCRNNs) in which residual connections result in well-defined Lyapunov exponents and allow for studying properties of fading memory. We investigate how the residual connections of WCRNNs influence their performance, network dynamics, and memory properties on a set of benchmark tasks. We show that several distinct forms of residual connections yield effective inductive biases that result in increased network expressivity. In particular, residual connections that (i) result in network dynamics at the proximity of the edge of chaos, (ii) allow networks to capitalize on characteristic spectral properties of the data, and (iii) result in heterogeneous memory properties are shown to increase practical expressivity. In addition, we demonstrate how our results can be extended to non-linear residuals and introduce a weakly coupled residual initialization scheme that can be used for Elman RNNs
In this research, we propose a novel approach for the quantification of credit portfolio Value-at-Risk (VaR) sensitivity to asset correlations with the use of synthetic financial correlation matrices generated with deep learning models. In previous work Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) were employed to demonstrate the generation of plausible correlation matrices, that capture the essential characteristics observed in empirical correlation matrices estimated on asset returns. Instead of GANs, we employ Variational Autoencoders (VAE) to achieve a more interpretable latent space representation. Through our analysis, we reveal that the VAE latent space can be a useful tool to capture the crucial factors impacting portfolio diversification, particularly in relation to credit portfolio sensitivity to asset correlations changes.
Mediation analysis is widely used in health science research to evaluate the extent to which an intermediate variable explains an observed exposure-outcome relationship. However, the validity of analysis can be compromised when the exposure is measured with error. Motivated by the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS), we investigate the impact of exposure measurement error on assessing mediation with a survival outcome, based on the Cox proportional hazards outcome model. When the outcome is rare and there is no exposure-mediator interaction, we show that the uncorrected estimators of the natural indirect and direct effects can be biased into either direction, but the uncorrected estimator of the mediation proportion is approximately unbiased as long as the measurement error is not large or the mediator-exposure association is not strong. We develop ordinary regression calibration and risk set regression calibration approaches to correct the exposure measurement error-induced bias when estimating mediation effects and allowing for an exposure-mediator interaction in the Cox outcome model. The proposed approaches require a validation study to characterize the measurement error process. We apply the proposed approaches to the HPFS (1986-2016) to evaluate extent to which reduced body mass index mediates the protective effect of vigorous physical activity on the risk of cardiovascular diseases, and compare the finite-sample properties of the proposed estimators via simulations.
Optimal transport and Wasserstein distances are flourishing in many scientific fields as a means for comparing and connecting random structures. Here we pioneer the use of an optimal transport distance between L\'{e}vy measures to solve a statistical problem. Dependent Bayesian nonparametric models provide flexible inference on distinct, yet related, groups of observations. Each component of a vector of random measures models a group of exchangeable observations, while their dependence regulates the borrowing of information across groups. We derive the first statistical index of dependence in $[0,1]$ for (completely) random measures that accounts for their whole infinite-dimensional distribution, which is assumed to be equal across different groups. This is accomplished by using the geometric properties of the Wasserstein distance to solve a max-min problem at the level of the underlying L\'{e}vy measures. The Wasserstein index of dependence sheds light on the models' deep structure and has desirable properties: (i) it is $0$ if and only if the random measures are independent; (ii) it is $1$ if and only if the random measures are completely dependent; (iii) it simultaneously quantifies the dependence of $d \ge 2$ random measures, avoiding the need for pairwise comparisons; (iv) it can be evaluated numerically. Moreover, the index allows for informed prior specifications and fair model comparisons for Bayesian nonparametric models.
The notion that algorithmic systems should be "transparent" and "explainable" is common in the many statements of consensus principles developed by governments, companies, and advocacy organizations. But what exactly do policy and legal actors want from these technical concepts, and how do their desiderata compare with the explainability techniques developed in the machine learning literature? In hopes of better connecting the policy and technical communities, we provide case studies illustrating five ways in which algorithmic transparency and explainability have been used in policy settings: specific requirements for explanations; in nonbinding guidelines for internal governance of algorithms; in regulations applicable to highly regulated settings; in guidelines meant to increase the utility of legal liability for algorithms; and broad requirements for model and data transparency. The case studies span a spectrum from precise requirements for specific types of explanations to nonspecific requirements focused on broader notions of transparency, illustrating the diverse needs, constraints, and capacities of various policy actors and contexts. Drawing on these case studies, we discuss promising ways in which transparency and explanation could be used in policy, as well as common factors limiting policymakers' use of algorithmic explainability. We conclude with recommendations for researchers and policymakers.
Many applications in computational physics involve approximating problems with microstructure, characterized by multiple spatial scales in their data. However, these numerical solutions are often computationally expensive due to the need to capture fine details at small scales. As a result, simulating such phenomena becomes unaffordable for many-query applications, such as parametrized systems with multiple scale-dependent features. Traditional projection-based reduced order models (ROMs) fail to resolve these issues, even for second-order elliptic PDEs commonly found in engineering applications. To address this, we propose an alternative nonintrusive strategy to build a ROM, that combines classical proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) with a suitable neural network (NN) model to account for the small scales. Specifically, we employ sparse mesh-informed neural networks (MINNs), which handle both spatial dependencies in the solutions and model parameters simultaneously. We evaluate the performance of this strategy on benchmark problems and then apply it to approximate a real-life problem involving the impact of microcirculation in transport phenomena through the tissue microenvironment.
We present a training method with linguistic speech regularization that improves the robustness of spontaneous speech synthesis methods with filled pause (FP) insertion. Spontaneous speech synthesis is aimed at producing speech with human-like disfluencies, such as FPs. Because modeling the complex data distribution of spontaneous speech with a rich FP vocabulary is challenging, the quality of FP-inserted synthetic speech is often limited. To address this issue, we present a method for synthesizing spontaneous speech that improves robustness to diverse FP insertions. Regularization is used to stabilize the synthesis of the linguistic speech (i.e., non-FP) elements. To further improve robustness to diverse FP insertions, it utilizes pseudo-FPs sampled using an FP word prediction model as well as ground-truth FPs. Our experiments demonstrated that the proposed method improves the naturalness of synthetic speech with ground-truth and predicted FPs by 0.24 and 0.26, respectively.
This paper introduces a comprehensive framework to adjust a discrete test statistic for improving its hypothesis testing procedure. The adjustment minimizes the Wasserstein distance to a null-approximating continuous distribution, tackling some fundamental challenges inherent in combining statistical significances derived from discrete distributions. The related theory justifies Lancaster's mid-p and mean-value chi-squared statistics for Fisher's combination as special cases. However, in order to counter the conservative nature of Lancaster's testing procedures, we propose an updated null-approximating distribution. It is achieved by further minimizing the Wasserstein distance to the adjusted statistics within a proper distribution family. Specifically, in the context of Fisher's combination, we propose an optimal gamma distribution as a substitute for the traditionally used chi-squared distribution. This new approach yields an asymptotically consistent test that significantly improves type I error control and enhances statistical power.
We hypothesize that due to the greedy nature of learning in multi-modal deep neural networks, these models tend to rely on just one modality while under-fitting the other modalities. Such behavior is counter-intuitive and hurts the models' generalization, as we observe empirically. To estimate the model's dependence on each modality, we compute the gain on the accuracy when the model has access to it in addition to another modality. We refer to this gain as the conditional utilization rate. In the experiments, we consistently observe an imbalance in conditional utilization rates between modalities, across multiple tasks and architectures. Since conditional utilization rate cannot be computed efficiently during training, we introduce a proxy for it based on the pace at which the model learns from each modality, which we refer to as the conditional learning speed. We propose an algorithm to balance the conditional learning speeds between modalities during training and demonstrate that it indeed addresses the issue of greedy learning. The proposed algorithm improves the model's generalization on three datasets: Colored MNIST, Princeton ModelNet40, and NVIDIA Dynamic Hand Gesture.
Deep learning is usually described as an experiment-driven field under continuous criticizes of lacking theoretical foundations. This problem has been partially fixed by a large volume of literature which has so far not been well organized. This paper reviews and organizes the recent advances in deep learning theory. The literature is categorized in six groups: (1) complexity and capacity-based approaches for analyzing the generalizability of deep learning; (2) stochastic differential equations and their dynamic systems for modelling stochastic gradient descent and its variants, which characterize the optimization and generalization of deep learning, partially inspired by Bayesian inference; (3) the geometrical structures of the loss landscape that drives the trajectories of the dynamic systems; (4) the roles of over-parameterization of deep neural networks from both positive and negative perspectives; (5) theoretical foundations of several special structures in network architectures; and (6) the increasingly intensive concerns in ethics and security and their relationships with generalizability.
Recent advances in 3D fully convolutional networks (FCN) have made it feasible to produce dense voxel-wise predictions of volumetric images. In this work, we show that a multi-class 3D FCN trained on manually labeled CT scans of several anatomical structures (ranging from the large organs to thin vessels) can achieve competitive segmentation results, while avoiding the need for handcrafting features or training class-specific models. To this end, we propose a two-stage, coarse-to-fine approach that will first use a 3D FCN to roughly define a candidate region, which will then be used as input to a second 3D FCN. This reduces the number of voxels the second FCN has to classify to ~10% and allows it to focus on more detailed segmentation of the organs and vessels. We utilize training and validation sets consisting of 331 clinical CT images and test our models on a completely unseen data collection acquired at a different hospital that includes 150 CT scans, targeting three anatomical organs (liver, spleen, and pancreas). In challenging organs such as the pancreas, our cascaded approach improves the mean Dice score from 68.5 to 82.2%, achieving the highest reported average score on this dataset. We compare with a 2D FCN method on a separate dataset of 240 CT scans with 18 classes and achieve a significantly higher performance in small organs and vessels. Furthermore, we explore fine-tuning our models to different datasets. Our experiments illustrate the promise and robustness of current 3D FCN based semantic segmentation of medical images, achieving state-of-the-art results. Our code and trained models are available for download: //github.com/holgerroth/3Dunet_abdomen_cascade.