亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

The concern about underlying discrimination hidden in ML models is increasing, as ML systems have been widely applied in more and more real-world scenarios and any discrimination hidden in them will directly affect human life. Many techniques have been developed to enhance fairness including commonly-used group fairness measures and several fairness-aware methods combining ensemble learning. However, existing fairness measures can only focus on one aspect -- either group or individual fairness, and the hard compatibility among them indicates a possibility of remaining biases even if one of them is satisfied. Moreover, existing mechanisms to boost fairness usually present empirical results to show validity, yet few of them discuss whether fairness can be boosted with certain theoretical guarantees. To address these issues, we propose a fairness quality measure named discriminative risk in this paper to reflect both individual and group fairness aspects. Furthermore, we investigate the properties of the proposed measure and propose first- and second-order oracle bounds to show that fairness can be boosted via ensemble combination with theoretical learning guarantees. Note that the analysis is suitable for both binary and multi-class classification. A pruning method is also proposed to utilise our proposed measure and comprehensive experiments are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed methods in this paper.

The Shapley value (SV) is a fair and principled metric for contribution evaluation in cross-silo federated learning (cross-silo FL), wherein organizations, i.e., clients, collaboratively train prediction models with the coordination of a parameter server. However, existing SV calculation methods for FL assume that the server can access the raw FL models and public test data. This may not be a valid assumption in practice considering the emerging privacy attacks on FL models and the fact that test data might be clients' private assets. Hence, we investigate the problem of secure SV calculation for cross-silo FL. We first propose HESV, a one-server solution based solely on homomorphic encryption (HE) for privacy protection, which has limitations in efficiency. To overcome these limitations, we propose SecSV, an efficient two-server protocol with the following novel features. First, SecSV utilizes a hybrid privacy protection scheme to avoid ciphertext--ciphertext multiplications between test data and models, which are extremely expensive under HE. Second, an efficient secure matrix multiplication method is proposed for SecSV. Third, SecSV strategically identifies and skips some test samples without significantly affecting the evaluation accuracy. Our experiments demonstrate that SecSV is 7.2-36.6 times as fast as HESV, with a limited loss in the accuracy of calculated SVs.

We consider a user-centric cell-free massive MIMO wireless network with $L$ remote radio units, each with $M$ antennas, serving $K_{\rm tot}$ user equipments (UEs). Most of the literature considers the regime $LM \gg K_{\rm tot}$, where the $K$ UEs are active on each time-frequency slot, and evaluates the system performance in terms of ergodic rates. In this paper, we take a quite different viewpoint. We observe that the regime of $LM \gg K_{\rm tot}$ corresponds to a lightly loaded system with low sum spectral efficiency (SE). In contrast, in most relevant scenarios, the number of UEs is much larger than the total number of antennas, but users are not all active at the same time. To achieve high sum SE and handle $K_{\rm tot} \gg ML$, users must be scheduled over the time-frequency resource. The number of active users $K_{\rm act} \leq K_{\rm tot}$ must be chosen such that: 1) the network operates close to its maximum SE; 2) the active user set must be chosen dynamically over time in order to enforce fairness in terms of per-user time-averaged throughput rates. The fairness scheduling problem is formulated as the maximization of a concave componentwise non-decreasing network utility function of the per-user rates. Intermittent user activity imposes slot-by-slot coding/decoding which prevents the achievability of ergodic rates. Hence, we model the per-slot service rates using information outage probability. To obtain a tractable problem, we make a decoupling assumption on the CDF of the instantaneous mutual information seen at each UE $k$ receiver. We approximately enforce this condition with a conflict graph that prevents the simultaneous scheduling of users with large pilot contamination and propose an adaptive scheme for instantaneous service rate scheduling. Overall, the proposed dynamic scheduling is robust to system model uncertainties and can be easily implemented in practice.

We present a hierarchical planning framework for dexterous robotic manipulation (HiDex). This framework exploits in-hand and extrinsic dexterity by actively exploring contacts. It generates rigid-body motions and complex contact sequences. Our framework is based on Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and has three levels: 1) planning object motions and environment contact modes; 2) planning robot contacts; 3) path evaluation and control optimization that passes the rewards to the upper levels. This framework offers two main advantages. First, it allows efficient global reasoning over high-dimensional complex space created by contacts. It solves a diverse set of manipulation tasks that require dexterity, both intrinsic (using the fingers) and extrinsic (also using the environment), mostly in seconds. Second, our framework allows the incorporation of expert knowledge and customizable setups in task mechanics and models. It requires minor modifications to accommodate different scenarios and robots. Hence, it could provide a flexible and generalizable solution for various manipulation tasks. As examples, we analyze the results on 7 hand configurations and 15 scenarios. We demonstrate 8 of them on two robot platforms.

The volume function V(t) of a compact set S\in R^d is just the Lebesgue measure of the set of points within a distance to S not larger than t. According to some classical results in geometric measure theory, the volume function turns out to be a polynomial, at least in a finite interval, under a quite intuitive, easy to interpret, sufficient condition (called ``positive reach'') which can be seen as an extension of the notion of convexity. However, many other simple sets, not fulfilling the positive reach condition, have also a polynomial volume function. To our knowledge, there is no general, simple geometric description of such sets. Still, the polynomial character of $V(t)$ has some relevant consequences since the polynomial coefficients carry some useful geometric information. In particular, the constant term is the volume of S and the first order coefficient is the boundary measure (in Minkowski's sense). This paper is focused on sets whose volume function is polynomial on some interval starting at zero, whose length (that we call ``polynomial reach'') might be unknown. Our main goal is to approximate such polynomial reach by statistical means, using only a large enough random sample of points inside S. The practical motivation is simple: when the value of the polynomial reach , or rather a lower bound for it, is approximately known, the polynomial coefficients can be estimated from the sample points by using standard methods in polynomial approximation. As a result, we get a quite general method to estimate the volume and boundary measure of the set, relying only on an inner sample of points and not requiring the use any smoothing parameter. This paper explores the theoretical and practical aspects of this idea.

Fairness has become increasingly pivotal in medical image recognition. However, without mitigating bias, deploying unfair medical AI systems could harm the interests of underprivileged populations. In this paper, we observe that while features extracted from the deeper layers of neural networks generally offer higher accuracy, fairness conditions deteriorate as we extract features from deeper layers. This phenomenon motivates us to extend the concept of multi-exit frameworks. Unlike existing works mainly focusing on accuracy, our multi-exit framework is fairness-oriented; the internal classifiers are trained to be more accurate and fairer, with high extensibility to apply to most existing fairness-aware frameworks. During inference, any instance with high confidence from an internal classifier is allowed to exit early. Experimental results show that the proposed framework can improve the fairness condition over the state-of-the-art in two dermatological disease datasets.

Conformal inference has played a pivotal role in providing uncertainty quantification for black-box ML prediction algorithms with finite sample guarantees. Traditionally, conformal prediction inference requires a data-independent specification of miscoverage level. In practical applications, one might want to update the miscoverage level after computing the prediction set. For example, in the context of binary classification, the analyst might start with a 95$\%$ prediction sets and see that most prediction sets contain all outcome classes. Prediction sets with both classes being undesirable, the analyst might desire to consider, say 80$\%$ prediction set. Construction of prediction sets that guarantee coverage with data-dependent miscoverage level can be considered as a post-selection inference problem. In this work, we develop simultaneous conformal inference to account for data-dependent miscoverage levels. Under the assumption of independent and identically distributed observations, our proposed methods have a finite sample simultaneous guarantee over all miscoverage levels. This allows practitioners to trade freely coverage probability for the quality of the prediction set by any criterion of their choice (say size of prediction set) while maintaining the finite sample guarantees similar to traditional conformal inference.

Along with the increasing availability of health data has come the rise of data-driven models to inform decision-making and policy. These models have the potential to benefit both patients and health care providers but can also exacerbate health inequities. Existing "algorithmic fairness" methods for measuring and correcting model bias fall short of what is needed for health policy in two key ways. First, methods typically focus on a single grouping along which discrimination may occur rather than considering multiple, intersecting groups. Second, in clinical applications, risk prediction is typically used to guide treatment, creating distinct statistical issues that invalidate most existing techniques. We present summary unfairness metrics that build on existing techniques in "counterfactual fairness" to address both challenges. We also develop a complete framework of estimation and inference tools for our metrics, including the unfairness value ("u-value"), used to determine the relative extremity of unfairness, and standard errors and confidence intervals employing an alternative to the standard bootstrap. We demonstrate application of our framework to a COVID-19 risk prediction model deployed in a major Midwestern health system.

This paper focuses on the expected difference in borrower's repayment when there is a change in the lender's credit decisions. Classical estimators overlook the confounding effects and hence the estimation error can be magnificent. As such, we propose another approach to construct the estimators such that the error can be greatly reduced. The proposed estimators are shown to be unbiased, consistent, and robust through a combination of theoretical analysis and numerical testing. Moreover, we compare the power of estimating the causal quantities between the classical estimators and the proposed estimators. The comparison is tested across a wide range of models, including linear regression models, tree-based models, and neural network-based models, under different simulated datasets that exhibit different levels of causality, different degrees of nonlinearity, and different distributional properties. Most importantly, we apply our approaches to a large observational dataset provided by a global technology firm that operates in both the e-commerce and the lending business. We find that the relative reduction of estimation error is strikingly substantial if the causal effects are accounted for correctly.

With the rapid increase of large-scale, real-world datasets, it becomes critical to address the problem of long-tailed data distribution (i.e., a few classes account for most of the data, while most classes are under-represented). Existing solutions typically adopt class re-balancing strategies such as re-sampling and re-weighting based on the number of observations for each class. In this work, we argue that as the number of samples increases, the additional benefit of a newly added data point will diminish. We introduce a novel theoretical framework to measure data overlap by associating with each sample a small neighboring region rather than a single point. The effective number of samples is defined as the volume of samples and can be calculated by a simple formula $(1-\beta^{n})/(1-\beta)$, where $n$ is the number of samples and $\beta \in [0,1)$ is a hyperparameter. We design a re-weighting scheme that uses the effective number of samples for each class to re-balance the loss, thereby yielding a class-balanced loss. Comprehensive experiments are conducted on artificially induced long-tailed CIFAR datasets and large-scale datasets including ImageNet and iNaturalist. Our results show that when trained with the proposed class-balanced loss, the network is able to achieve significant performance gains on long-tailed datasets.