亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

We prove that for any graph $G$ of maximum degree at most $\Delta$, the zeros of its chromatic polynomial $\chi_G(x)$ (in $\mathbb{C}$) lie inside the disc of radius $5.94 \Delta$ centered at $0$. This improves on the previously best known bound of approximately $6.91\Delta$. We also obtain improved bounds for graphs of high girth. We prove that for every $g$ there is a constant $K_g$ such that for any graph $G$ of maximum degree at most $\Delta$ and girth at least $g$, the zeros of its chromatic polynomial $\chi_G(x)$ lie inside the disc of radius $K_g \Delta$ centered at $0$, where $K_g$ is the solution to a certain optimization problem. In particular, $K_g < 5$ when $g \geq 5$ and $K_g < 4$ when $g \geq 25$ and $K_g$ tends to approximately $3.86$ as $g \to \infty$. Key to the proof is a classical theorem of Whitney which allows us to relate the chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$ to the generating function of so-called broken-circuit-free forests in $G$. We also establish a zero-free disc for the generating function of all forests in $G$ (aka the partition function of the arboreal gas) which may be of independent interest.

Let $X$ be a $p$-variate random vector and $\widetilde{X}$ a knockoff copy of $X$ (in the sense of \cite{CFJL18}). A new approach for constructing $\widetilde{X}$ (henceforth, NA) has been introduced in \cite{JSPI}. NA has essentially three advantages: (i) To build $\widetilde{X}$ is straightforward; (ii) The joint distribution of $(X,\widetilde{X})$ can be written in closed form; (iii) $\widetilde{X}$ is often optimal under various criteria. However, for NA to apply, $X_1,\ldots, X_p$ should be conditionally independent given some random element $Z$. Our first result is that any probability measure $\mu$ on $\mathbb{R}^p$ can be approximated by a probability measure $\mu_0$ of the form $$\mu_0\bigl(A_1\times\ldots\times A_p\bigr)=E\Bigl\{\prod_{i=1}^p P(X_i\in A_i\mid Z)\Bigr\}.$$ The approximation is in total variation distance when $\mu$ is absolutely continuous, and an explicit formula for $\mu_0$ is provided. If $X\sim\mu_0$, then $X_1,\ldots,X_p$ are conditionally independent. Hence, with a negligible error, one can assume $X\sim\mu_0$ and build $\widetilde{X}$ through NA. Our second result is a characterization of the knockoffs $\widetilde{X}$ obtained via NA. It is shown that $\widetilde{X}$ is of this type if and only if the pair $(X,\widetilde{X})$ can be extended to an infinite sequence so as to satisfy certain invariance conditions. The basic tool for proving this fact is de Finetti's theorem for partially exchangeable sequences. In addition to the quoted results, an explicit formula for the conditional distribution of $\widetilde{X}$ given $X$ is obtained in a few cases. In one of such cases, it is assumed $X_i\in\{0,1\}$ for all $i$.

For a functor $Q$ from a category $C$ to the category $Pos$ of ordered sets and order-preserving functions, we study liftings of various kind of structures from the base category $C$ to the total(or Grothendieck) category $\int Q$. That lifting a monoidal structure corresponds to giving some lax natural transformation making $Q$ almost monoidal, might be part of folklore in category theory.We rely on and generalize the tools supporting this correspondence so to provide exact conditions for lifting symmetric monoidal closed and star-autonomous structures.A corollary of these characterizations is that, if $Q$ factors as a monoidal functor through $SLatt$, the category of complete lattices and sup-preserving functions, then $\int Q$ is always symmetric monoidalclosed. In this case, we also provide a method, based on the double negation nucleus from quantale theory, to turn $\int Q$ into a star-autonomous category.The theory developed, originally motivated from the categories $P-Set$ of Schalk and de Paiva, yields a wide generalization of Hyland and Schalk construction of star-autonomous categories by means of orthogonality structures.

In this manuscript, we work over the non-chain ring $\mathcal{R} = \mathbb{F}_2[u]/\langle u^3 - u\rangle $. Let $m\in \mathbb{N}$ and let $L, M, N \subseteq [m]:=\{1, 2, \dots, m\}$. For $X\subseteq [m]$, define $\Delta_X:=\{v \in \mathbb{F}_2^m : \textnormal{Supp}(v)\subseteq X\}$ and $D:= (1+u^2)D_1 + u^2D_2 + (u+u^2)D_3$, an ordered finite multiset consisting of elements from $\mathcal{R}^m$, where $D_1\in \{\Delta_L, \Delta_L^c\}, D_2\in \{\Delta_M, \Delta_M^c\}, D_3\in \{\Delta_N, \Delta_N^c\}$. The linear code $C_D$ over $\mathcal{R}$ defined by $\{\big(v\cdot d\big)_{d\in D} : v \in \mathcal{R}^m \}$ is studied for each $D$. Further, we also consider simplicial complexes with two maximal elements in the above work. We study their binary Gray images and the binary subfield-like codes corresponding to a certain $\mathbb{F}_{2}$-functional of $\mathcal{R}$. Sufficient conditions for these binary linear codes to be minimal and self-orthogonal are obtained in each case. Besides, we produce an infinite family of optimal codes with respect to the Griesmer bound. Most of the codes obtained in this manuscript are few-weight codes.

Consider the regression problem where the response $Y\in\mathbb{R}$ and the covariate $X\in\mathbb{R}^d$ for $d\geq 1$ are \textit{unmatched}. Under this scenario, we do not have access to pairs of observations from the distribution of $(X, Y)$, but instead, we have separate datasets $\{Y_i\}_{i=1}^n$ and $\{X_j\}_{j=1}^m$, possibly collected from different sources. We study this problem assuming that the regression function is linear and the noise distribution is known or can be estimated. We introduce an estimator of the regression vector based on deconvolution and demonstrate its consistency and asymptotic normality under an identifiability assumption. In the general case, we show that our estimator (DLSE: Deconvolution Least Squared Estimator) is consistent in terms of an extended $\ell_2$ norm. Using this observation, we devise a method for semi-supervised learning, i.e., when we have access to a small sample of matched pairs $(X_k, Y_k)$. Several applications with synthetic and real datasets are considered to illustrate the theory.

We show that the problem of counting the number of $n$-variable unate functions reduces to the problem of counting the number of $n$-variable monotone functions. Using recently obtained results on $n$-variable monotone functions, we obtain counts of $n$-variable unate functions up to $n=9$. We use an enumeration strategy to obtain the number of $n$-variable balanced monotone functions up to $n=7$. We show that the problem of counting the number of $n$-variable balanced unate functions reduces to the problem of counting the number of $n$-variable balanced monotone functions, and consequently, we obtain the number of $n$-variable balanced unate functions up to $n=7$. Using enumeration, we obtain the numbers of equivalence classes of $n$-variable balanced monotone functions, unate functions and balanced unate functions up to $n=6$. Further, for each of the considered sub-class of $n$-variable monotone and unate functions, we also obtain the corresponding numbers of $n$-variable non-degenerate functions.

A cross-bifix-free code of length $n$ over $\mathbb{Z}_q$ is defined as a non-empty subset of $\mathbb{Z}_q^n$ satisfying that the prefix set of each codeword is disjoint from the suffix set of every codeword. Cross-bifix-free codes have found important applications in digital communication systems. One of the main research problems on cross-bifix-free codes is to construct cross-bifix-free codes as large as possible in size. Recently, Wang and Wang introduced a family of cross-bifix-free codes $S_{I,J}^{(k)}(n)$, which is a generalization of the classical cross-bifix-free codes studied early by Lvenshtein, Gilbert and Chee {\it et al.}. It is known that $S_{I,J}^{(k)}(n)$ is nearly optimal in size and $S_{I,J}^{(k)}(n)$ is non-expandable if $k=n-1$ or $1\leq k<n/2$. In this paper, we first show that $S_{I,J}^{(k)}(n)$ is non-expandable if and only if $k=n-1$ or $1\leq k<n/2$, thereby improving the results in [Chee {\it et al.}, IEEE-TIT, 2013] and [Wang and Wang, IEEE-TIT, 2022]. We then construct a new family of cross-bifix-free codes $U^{(t)}_{I,J}(n)$ to expand $S_{I,J}^{(k)}(n)$ such that the resulting larger code $S_{I,J}^{(k)}(n)\bigcup U^{(t)}_{I,J}(n)$ is a non-expandable cross-bifix-free code whenever $S_{I,J}^{(k)}(n)$ is expandable. Finally, we present an explicit formula for the size of $S_{I,J}^{(k)}(n)\bigcup U^{(t)}_{I,J}(n)$.

Lawvere showed that generalised metric spaces are categories enriched over $[0, \infty]$, the quantale of the positive extended reals. The statement of enrichment is a quantitative analogue of being a preorder. Towards seeking a logic for quantitative metric reasoning, we investigate three $[0,\infty]$-valued propositional logics over the Lawvere quantale. The basic logical connectives shared by all three logics are those that can be interpreted in any quantale, viz finite conjunctions and disjunctions, tensor (addition for the Lawvere quantale) and linear implication (here a truncated subtraction); to these we add, in turn, the constant $1$ to express integer values, and scalar multiplication by a non-negative real to express general affine combinations. Quantitative equational logic can be interpreted in the third logic if we allow inference systems instead of axiomatic systems. For each of these logics we develop a natural deduction system which we prove to be decidably complete w.r.t. the quantale-valued semantics. The heart of the completeness proof makes use of the Motzkin transposition theorem. Consistency is also decidable; the proof makes use of Fourier-Motzkin elimination of linear inequalities. Strong completeness does not hold in general, even (as is known) for theories over finitely-many propositional variables; indeed even an approximate form of strong completeness in the sense of Pavelka or Ben Yaacov -- provability up to arbitrary precision -- does not hold. However, we can show it for theories axiomatized by a (not necessarily finite) set of judgements in normal form over a finite set of propositional variables when we restrict to models that do not map variables to $\infty$; the proof uses Hurwicz's general form of the Farkas' Lemma.

In Linear Logic ($\mathsf{LL}$), the exponential modality $!$ brings forth a distinction between non-linear proofs and linear proofs, where linear means using an argument exactly once. Differential Linear Logic ($\mathsf{DiLL}$) is an extension of Linear Logic which includes additional rules for $!$ which encode differentiation and the ability of linearizing proofs. On the other hand, Graded Linear Logic ($\mathsf{GLL}$) is a variation of Linear Logic in such a way that $!$ is now indexed over a semiring $R$. This $R$-grading allows for non-linear proofs of degree $r \in R$, such that the linear proofs are of degree $1 \in R$. There has been recent interest in combining these two variations of $\mathsf{LL}$ together and developing Graded Differential Linear Logic ($\mathsf{GDiLL}$). In this paper we present a sequent calculus for $\mathsf{GDiLL}$, as well as introduce its categorical semantics, which we call graded differential categories, using both coderelictions and deriving transformations. We prove that symmetric powers always give graded differential categories, and provide other examples of graded differential categories. We also discuss graded versions of (monoidal) coalgebra modalities, additive bialgebra modalities, and the Seely isomorphisms, as well as their implementations in the sequent calculus of $\mathsf{GDiLL}$.

The discrepancy of the $n \times n$ greater-than matrix is shown to be $\frac{\pi}{2 \ln n}$ up to lower order terms.