亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

We provide the first stochastic convergence rates for a family of adaptive quadrature rules used to normalize the posterior distribution in Bayesian models. Our results apply to the uniform relative error in the approximate posterior density, the coverage probabilities of approximate credible sets, and approximate moments and quantiles, therefore guaranteeing fast asymptotic convergence of approximate summary statistics used in practice. The family of quadrature rules includes adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature, and we apply this rule in two challenging low-dimensional examples. Further, we demonstrate how adaptive quadrature can be used as a crucial component of a modern approximate Bayesian inference procedure for high-dimensional additive models. The method is implemented and made publicly available in the aghq package for the R language, available on CRAN.

We consider optimization problems in which the goal is find a $k$-dimensional subspace of $\mathbb{R}^n$, $k<<n$, which minimizes a convex and smooth loss. Such problems generalize the fundamental task of principal component analysis (PCA) to include robust and sparse counterparts, and logistic PCA for binary data, among others. This problem could be approached either via nonconvex gradient methods with highly-efficient iterations, but for which arguing about fast convergence to a global minimizer is difficult or, via a convex relaxation for which arguing about convergence to a global minimizer is straightforward, but the corresponding methods are often inefficient in high dimensions. In this work we bridge these two approaches under a strict complementarity assumption, which in particular implies that the optimal solution to the convex relaxation is unique and is also the optimal solution to the original nonconvex problem. Our main result is a proof that a natural nonconvex gradient method which is \textit{SVD-free} and requires only a single QR-factorization of an $n\times k$ matrix per iteration, converges locally with a linear rate. We also establish linear convergence results for the nonconvex projected gradient method, and the Frank-Wolfe method when applied to the convex relaxation.

We study the regret guarantee for risk-sensitive reinforcement learning (RSRL) via distributional reinforcement learning (DRL) methods. In particular, we consider finite episodic Markov decision processes whose objective is the entropic risk measure (EntRM) of return. We identify a key property of the EntRM, the monotonicity-preserving property, which enables the risk-sensitive distributional dynamic programming framework. We then propose two novel DRL algorithms that implement optimism through two different schemes, including a model-free one and a model-based one. We prove that both of them attain $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\frac{\exp(|\beta| H)-1}{|\beta|H}H\sqrt{HS^2AT})$ regret upper bound, where $S$ is the number of states, $A$ the number of states, $H$ the time horizon and $T$ the number of total time steps. It matches RSVI2 proposed in \cite{fei2021exponential} with a much simpler regret analysis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first regret analysis of DRL, which bridges DRL and RSRL in terms of sample complexity. Finally, we improve the existing lower bound by proving a tighter bound of $\Omega(\frac{\exp(\beta H/6)-1}{\beta H}H\sqrt{SAT})$ for $\beta>0$ case, which recovers the tight lower bound $\Omega(H\sqrt{SAT})$ in the risk-neutral setting.

Stochastic versions of proximal methods have gained much attention in statistics and machine learning. These algorithms tend to admit simple, scalable forms, and enjoy numerical stability via implicit updates. In this work, we propose and analyze a stochastic version of the recently proposed proximal distance algorithm, a class of iterative optimization methods that recover a desired constrained estimation problem as a penalty parameter $\rho \rightarrow \infty$. By uncovering connections to related stochastic proximal methods and interpreting the penalty parameter as the learning rate, we justify heuristics used in practical manifestations of the proximal distance method, establishing their convergence guarantees for the first time. Moreover, we extend recent theoretical devices to establish finite error bounds and a complete characterization of convergence rates regimes. We validate our analysis via a thorough empirical study, also showing that unsurprisingly, the proposed method outpaces batch versions on popular learning tasks.

Compared to on-policy policy gradient techniques, off-policy model-free deep reinforcement learning (RL) that uses previously gathered data can improve sampling efficiency. However, off-policy learning becomes challenging when the discrepancy between the distributions of the policy of interest and the policies that collected the data increases. Although the well-studied importance sampling and off-policy policy gradient techniques were proposed to compensate for this discrepancy, they usually require a collection of long trajectories that increases the computational complexity and induce additional problems such as vanishing/exploding gradients or discarding many useful experiences. Moreover, their generalization to continuous action domains is strictly limited as they require action probabilities, which is unsuitable for deterministic policies. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a novel policy similarity measure to mitigate the effects of such discrepancy. Our method offers an adequate single-step off-policy correction without any probability estimates, and theoretical results show that it can achieve a contraction mapping with a fixed unique point, which allows "safe" off-policy learning. An extensive set of empirical results indicate that our algorithm substantially improves the state-of-the-art and attains higher returns in fewer steps than the competing methods by efficiently scheduling the learning rate in Q-learning and policy optimization.

We introduce a new Langevin dynamics based algorithm, called e-TH$\varepsilon$O POULA, to solve optimization problems with discontinuous stochastic gradients which naturally appear in real-world applications such as quantile estimation, vector quantization, CVaR minimization, and regularized optimization problems involving ReLU neural networks. We demonstrate both theoretically and numerically the applicability of the e-TH$\varepsilon$O POULA algorithm. More precisely, under the conditions that the stochastic gradient is locally Lipschitz in average and satisfies a certain convexity at infinity condition, we establish non-asymptotic error bounds for e-TH$\varepsilon$O POULA in Wasserstein distances and provide a non-asymptotic estimate for the expected excess risk, which can be controlled to be arbitrarily small. Three key applications in finance and insurance are provided, namely, multi-period portfolio optimization, transfer learning in multi-period portfolio optimization, and insurance claim prediction, which involve neural networks with (Leaky)-ReLU activation functions. Numerical experiments conducted using real-world datasets illustrate the superior empirical performance of e-TH$\varepsilon$O POULA compared to SGLD, ADAM, and AMSGrad in terms of model accuracy.

We propose and analyze exact and inexact regularized Newton-type methods for finding a global saddle point of a \textit{convex-concave} unconstrained min-max optimization problem. Compared to their first-order counterparts, investigations of second-order methods for min-max optimization are relatively limited, as obtaining global rates of convergence with second-order information is much more involved. In this paper, we highlight how second-order information can be used to speed up the dynamics of dual extrapolation methods {despite inexactness}. Specifically, we show that the proposed algorithms generate iterates that remain within a bounded set and the averaged iterates converge to an $\epsilon$-saddle point within $O(\epsilon^{-2/3})$ iterations in terms of a gap function. Our algorithms match the theoretically established lower bound in this context and our analysis provides a simple and intuitive convergence analysis for second-order methods without requiring any compactness assumptions. Finally, we present a series of numerical experiments on synthetic and real data that demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed algorithms.

Machine learning problems with multiple objective functions appear either in learning with multiple criteria where learning has to make a trade-off between multiple performance metrics such as fairness, safety and accuracy; or, in multi-task learning where multiple tasks are optimized jointly, sharing inductive bias between them. This problems are often tackled by the multi-objective optimization framework. However, existing stochastic multi-objective gradient methods and its variants (e.g., MGDA, PCGrad, CAGrad, etc.) all adopt a biased noisy gradient direction, which leads to degraded empirical performance. To this end, we develop a stochastic Multi-objective gradient Correction (MoCo) method for multi-objective optimization. The unique feature of our method is that it can guarantee convergence without increasing the batch size even in the non-convex setting. Simulations on multi-task supervised and reinforcement learning demonstrate the effectiveness of our method relative to state-of-the-art methods.

The study of robustness has received much attention due to its inevitability in data-driven settings where many systems face uncertainty. One such example of concern is Bayesian Optimization (BO), where uncertainty is multi-faceted, yet there only exists a limited number of works dedicated to this direction. In particular, there is the work of Kirschner et al. (2020), which bridges the existing literature of Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO) by casting the BO problem from the lens of DRO. While this work is pioneering, it admittedly suffers from various practical shortcomings such as finite contexts assumptions, leaving behind the main question Can one devise a computationally tractable algorithm for solving this DRO-BO problem? In this work, we tackle this question to a large degree of generality by considering robustness against data-shift in $\phi$-divergences, which subsumes many popular choices, such as the $\chi^2$-divergence, Total Variation, and the extant Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. We show that the DRO-BO problem in this setting is equivalent to a finite-dimensional optimization problem which, even in the continuous context setting, can be easily implemented with provable sublinear regret bounds. We then show experimentally that our method surpasses existing methods, attesting to the theoretical results.

We derive information-theoretic generalization bounds for supervised learning algorithms based on the information contained in predictions rather than in the output of the training algorithm. These bounds improve over the existing information-theoretic bounds, are applicable to a wider range of algorithms, and solve two key challenges: (a) they give meaningful results for deterministic algorithms and (b) they are significantly easier to estimate. We show experimentally that the proposed bounds closely follow the generalization gap in practical scenarios for deep learning.