亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

Physics-guided deep learning is an important prevalent research topic in scientific machine learning, which has tremendous potential in various complex applications including science and engineering. In these applications, data is expensive to acquire and high accuracy is required for making decisions. In this work, we introduce an efficient physics-guided deep learning framework for the variational modeling of nonlinear inverse problems, which is then applied to solve an electrical impedance tomography (EIT) inverse problem. The framework is achieved by unrolling the proposed Anderson accelerated Gauss-Newton (GNAA) algorithm into an end-to-end deep learning method. Firstly, we show the convergence of the GNAA algorithm in both cases: Anderson depth is equal to one and Anderson depth is greater than one. Then, we propose three types of strategies by combining the complementary strengths of GNAA and deep learning: GNAA of learned regularization (GNAA-LRNet), where the singular values of the regularization matrix are learned by a deep neural network; GNAA of learned proximity (GNAA-LPNet), where the regularization proximal operator is learned by using a deep neural network; GNAA of plug-and-play method (GNAA-PnPNet) where the regularization proximal operator is replaced by a pre-trained deep denoisers. Lastly, we present some numerical experiments to illustrate that the proposed approaches greatly improve the convergence rate and the quality of inverse solutions.

We investigate additive Schwarz methods for semilinear elliptic problems with convex energy functionals, which have wide scientific applications. A key observation is that the convergence rates of both one- and two-level additive Schwarz methods have bounds independent of the nonlinear term in the problem. That is, the convergence rates do not deteriorate by the presence of nonlinearity, so that solving a semilinear problem requires no more iterations than a linear problem. Moreover, the two-level method is scalable in the sense that the convergence rate of the method depends on $H/h$ and $H/\delta$ only, where $h$ and $H$ are the typical diameters of an element and a subdomain, respectively, and $\delta$ measures the overlap among the subdomains. Numerical results are provided to support our theoretical findings.

We present a reduced basis method for cheaply constructing (possibly rough) approximations to the nodal basis functions of the virtual element space, and propose to use such approximations for the design of the stabilization term in the virtual element method and for the post-processing of the solution.

The arrival of AI techniques in computations, with the potential for hallucinations and non-robustness, has made trustworthiness of algorithms a focal point. However, trustworthiness of the many classical approaches are not well understood. This is the case for feature selection, a classical problem in the sciences, statistics, machine learning etc. Here, the LASSO optimisation problem is standard. Despite its widespread use, it has not been established when the output of algorithms attempting to compute support sets of minimisers of LASSO in order to do feature selection can be trusted. In this paper we establish how no (randomised) algorithm that works on all inputs can determine the correct support sets (with probability $> 1/2$) of minimisers of LASSO when reading approximate input, regardless of precision and computing power. However, we define a LASSO condition number and design an efficient algorithm for computing these support sets provided the input data is well-posed (has finite condition number) in time polynomial in the dimensions and logarithm of the condition number. For ill-posed inputs the algorithm runs forever, hence, it will never produce a wrong answer. Furthermore, the algorithm computes an upper bound for the condition number when this is finite. Finally, for any algorithm defined on an open set containing a point with infinite condition number, there is an input for which the algorithm will either run forever or produce a wrong answer. Our impossibility results stem from generalised hardness of approximation -- within the Solvability Complexity Index (SCI) hierarchy framework -- that generalises the classical phenomenon of hardness of approximation.

Simulation-based inference (SBI) provides a powerful framework for inferring posterior distributions of stochastic simulators in a wide range of domains. In many settings, however, the posterior distribution is not the end goal itself -- rather, the derived parameter values and their uncertainties are used as a basis for deciding what actions to take. Unfortunately, because posterior distributions provided by SBI are (potentially crude) approximations of the true posterior, the resulting decisions can be suboptimal. Here, we address the question of how to perform Bayesian decision making on stochastic simulators, and how one can circumvent the need to compute an explicit approximation to the posterior. Our method trains a neural network on simulated data and can predict the expected cost given any data and action, and can, thus, be directly used to infer the action with lowest cost. We apply our method to several benchmark problems and demonstrate that it induces similar cost as the true posterior distribution. We then apply the method to infer optimal actions in a real-world simulator in the medical neurosciences, the Bayesian Virtual Epileptic Patient, and demonstrate that it allows to infer actions associated with low cost after few simulations.

Seismic imaging is the numerical process of creating a volumetric representation of the subsurface geological structures from elastic waves recorded at the surface of the Earth. As such, it is widely utilized in the energy and construction sectors for applications ranging from oil and gas prospection, to geothermal production and carbon capture and storage monitoring, to geotechnical assessment of infrastructures. Extracting quantitative information from seismic recordings, such as an acoustic impedance model, is however a highly ill-posed inverse problem, due to the band-limited and noisy nature of the data. This paper introduces IntraSeismic, a novel hybrid seismic inversion method that seamlessly combines coordinate-based learning with the physics of the post-stack modeling operator. Key features of IntraSeismic are i) unparalleled performance in 2D and 3D post-stack seismic inversion, ii) rapid convergence rates, iii) ability to seamlessly include hard constraints (i.e., well data) and perform uncertainty quantification, and iv) potential data compression and fast randomized access to portions of the inverted model. Synthetic and field data applications of IntraSeismic are presented to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

We study hypothesis testing under communication constraints, where each sample is quantized before being revealed to a statistician. Without communication constraints, it is well known that the sample complexity of simple binary hypothesis testing is characterized by the Hellinger distance between the distributions. We show that the sample complexity of simple binary hypothesis testing under communication constraints is at most a logarithmic factor larger than in the unconstrained setting and this bound is tight. We develop a polynomial-time algorithm that achieves the aforementioned sample complexity. Our framework extends to robust hypothesis testing, where the distributions are corrupted in the total variation distance. Our proofs rely on a new reverse data processing inequality and a reverse Markov inequality, which may be of independent interest. For simple $M$-ary hypothesis testing, the sample complexity in the absence of communication constraints has a logarithmic dependence on $M$. We show that communication constraints can cause an exponential blow-up leading to $\Omega(M)$ sample complexity even for adaptive algorithms.

Machine-learning models have demonstrated great success in learning complex patterns that enable them to make predictions about unobserved data. In addition to using models for prediction, the ability to interpret what a model has learned is receiving an increasing amount of attention. However, this increased focus has led to considerable confusion about the notion of interpretability. In particular, it is unclear how the wide array of proposed interpretation methods are related, and what common concepts can be used to evaluate them. We aim to address these concerns by defining interpretability in the context of machine learning and introducing the Predictive, Descriptive, Relevant (PDR) framework for discussing interpretations. The PDR framework provides three overarching desiderata for evaluation: predictive accuracy, descriptive accuracy and relevancy, with relevancy judged relative to a human audience. Moreover, to help manage the deluge of interpretation methods, we introduce a categorization of existing techniques into model-based and post-hoc categories, with sub-groups including sparsity, modularity and simulatability. To demonstrate how practitioners can use the PDR framework to evaluate and understand interpretations, we provide numerous real-world examples. These examples highlight the often under-appreciated role played by human audiences in discussions of interpretability. Finally, based on our framework, we discuss limitations of existing methods and directions for future work. We hope that this work will provide a common vocabulary that will make it easier for both practitioners and researchers to discuss and choose from the full range of interpretation methods.

Deep learning constitutes a recent, modern technique for image processing and data analysis, with promising results and large potential. As deep learning has been successfully applied in various domains, it has recently entered also the domain of agriculture. In this paper, we perform a survey of 40 research efforts that employ deep learning techniques, applied to various agricultural and food production challenges. We examine the particular agricultural problems under study, the specific models and frameworks employed, the sources, nature and pre-processing of data used, and the overall performance achieved according to the metrics used at each work under study. Moreover, we study comparisons of deep learning with other existing popular techniques, in respect to differences in classification or regression performance. Our findings indicate that deep learning provides high accuracy, outperforming existing commonly used image processing techniques.