亚洲男人的天堂2018av,欧美草比,久久久久久免费视频精选,国色天香在线看免费,久久久久亚洲av成人片仓井空

Stacking (or stacked generalization) is an ensemble learning method with one main distinctiveness from the rest: even though several base models are trained on the original data set, their predictions are further used as input data for one or more metamodels arranged in at least one extra layer. Composing a stack of models can produce high-performance outcomes, but it usually involves a trial-and-error process. Therefore, our previously developed visual analytics system, StackGenVis, was mainly designed to assist users in choosing a set of top-performing and diverse models by measuring their predictive performance. However, it only employs a single logistic regression metamodel. In this paper, we investigate the impact of alternative metamodels on the performance of stacking ensembles using a novel visualization tool, called MetaStackVis. Our interactive tool helps users to visually explore different singular and pairs of metamodels according to their predictive probabilities and multiple validation metrics, as well as their ability to predict specific problematic data instances. MetaStackVis was evaluated with a usage scenario based on a medical data set and via expert interviews.

相關內容

At the same time that artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are becoming central to human life, their potential harms become more vivid. In the presence of such drawbacks, a critical question to address before using individual predictions for critical decision-making is whether those are reliable. Aligned with recent efforts on data-centric AI, this paper proposes a novel approach, complementary to the existing work on trustworthy AI, to address the reliability question through the lens of data. Specifically, it associates data sets with distrust quantification that specifies their scope of use for individual predictions. It develops novel algorithms for efficient and effective computation of distrust values. The proposed algorithms learn the necessary components of the measures from the data itself and are sublinear, which makes them scalable to very large and multi-dimensional settings. Furthermore, an estimator is designed to enable no-data access during the query time. Besides theoretical analyses, the algorithms are evaluated experimentally, using multiple real and synthetic data sets and different tasks. The experiment results reflect a consistent correlation between distrust values and model performance. This highlights the necessity of dismissing prediction outcomes for cases with high distrust values, at least for critical decisions.

State-of-art NPUs are typically architected as a self-contained sub-system with multiple heterogeneous hardware computing modules, and a dataflow-driven programming model. There lacks well-established methodology and tools in the industry to evaluate and compare the performance of NPUs from different architectures. We present an event-based performance modeling framework, VPU-EM, targeting scalable performance evaluation of modern NPUs across diversified AI workloads. The framework adopts high-level event-based system-simulation methodology to abstract away design details for speed, while maintaining hardware pipelining, concurrency and interaction with software task scheduling. It is natively developed in Python and built to interface directly with AI frameworks such as Tensorflow, PyTorch, ONNX and OpenVINO, linking various in-house NPU graph compilers to achieve optimized full model performance. Furthermore, VPU-EM also provides the capability to model power characteristics of NPU in Power-EM mode to enable joint performance/power analysis. Using VPU-EM, we conduct performance/power analysis of models from representative neural network architecture. We demonstrate that even though this framework is developed for Intel VPU, an Intel in-house NPU IP technology, the methodology can be generalized for analysis of modern NPUs.

Robotic systems are complex cyber-physical systems (CPS) commonly equipped with multiple sensors and effectors. Recent simulation methods enable the Digital Twin (DT) concept realisation. However, DT employment in robotic system development, e.g. in-development testing, is unclear. During the system development, its parts evolve from simulated mockups to physical parts which run software deployed on the actual hardware. Therefore, a design tool and a flexible development procedure ensuring the integrity of the simulated and physical parts are required. We aim to maximise the integration between a CPS's simulated and physical parts in various setups. The better integration, the better simulation-based testing coverage of the physical part (hardware and software). We propose a Domain Specification Language (DSL) based on Systems Modeling Language (SysML) that we refer to as SPSysML (Simulation-Physical System Modeling Language). SPSysML defines the taxonomy of a Simulation-Physical System (SPSys), being a CPS consisting of at least a physical or simulated part. In particular, the simulated ones can be DTs. We propose a SPSys Development Procedure (SPSysDP) that enables the maximisation of the simulation-physical integrity of SPSys by evaluating the proposed factors. SPSysDP is used to develop a complex robotic system for the INCARE project. In subsequent iterations of SPSysDP, the simulation-physical integrity of the system is maximised. As a result, the system model consists of fewer components, and a greater fraction of the system components are shared between various system setups. We implement and test the system with popular frameworks, Robot Operating System (ROS) and Gazebo simulator. SPSysML with SPSysDP enables the design of SPSys (including DT and CPS), multi-setup system development featuring maximised integrity between simulation and physical parts in its setups.

Unsupervised machine learning lacks ground truth by definition. This poses a major difficulty when designing metrics to evaluate the performance of such algorithms. In sharp contrast with supervised learning, for which plenty of quality metrics have been studied in the literature, in the field of dimensionality reduction only a few over-simplistic metrics has been proposed. In this work, we aim to introduce the first highly non-trivial dimensionality reduction performance metric. This metric is based on the sectional curvature behaviour arising from Riemannian geometry. To test its feasibility, this metric has been used to evaluate the performance of the most commonly used dimension reduction algorithms in the state of the art. Furthermore, to make the evaluation of the algorithms robust and representative, using curvature properties of planar curves, a new parameterized problem instance generator has been constructed in the form of a function generator. Experimental results are consistent with what could be expected based on the design and characteristics of the evaluated algorithms and the features of the data instances used to feed the method.

The complexity of today's robot control systems implies difficulty in developing them efficiently and reliably. Systems engineering (SE) and frameworks come to help. The framework metamodels are needed to support the standardisation and correctness of the created application models. Although the use of frameworks is widespread nowadays, for the most popular of them, Robot Operating System (ROS) version 1, a complete, contemporary metamodel, has been missing so far. This article proposes a new metamodel for ROS (MeROS), which addresses both the running system and developer workspace. For compatibility with the latest versions of ROS 1, the metamodel includes the latest ROS 1 concepts such as nodelet, action, and metapackage. An essential addition to the original ROS concepts is the grouping concepts, which provide an opportunity to illustrate the decomposition of the system, as well as varying degrees of detail in its presentation. The metamodel is derived from the requirements and then verified on the practical example of the Rico assistive robot. The matter is described in the SysML language, supported by standard development tools to conduct projects in the spirit of SE.

Currently, inter-organizational process collaboration (IOPC) has been widely used in the design and development of distributed systems that support business process execution. Blockchain-based IOPC can establish trusted data sharing among participants, attracting more and more attention. The core of such study is to translate the graphical model (e.g., BPMN) into program code called smart contract that can be executed in the blockchain environment. In this context, a proper smart contract plays a vital role in the correct implementation of block-chain-based IOPC. In fact, the quality of graphical model affects the smart con-tract generation. Problematic models (e.g., deadlock) will result in incorrect contracts (causing unexpected behaviours). To avoid this undesired implementation, this paper explores to generate smart contracts by using the verified formal model as input instead of graphical model. Specifically, we introduce a prototype framework that supports the automatic generation of smart contracts, providing an end-to-end solution from modeling, verification, translation to implementation. One of the cores of this framework is to provide a CSP#-based formalization for the BPMN collaboration model from the perspective of message interaction. This formalization provides precise execution semantics and model verification for graphical models, and a verified formal model for smart contract generation. Another novelty is that it introduces a syntax tree-based translation algorithm to directly map the formal model into a smart contract. The required formalism, verification and translation techniques are transparent to users without imposing additional burdens. Finally, a set of experiments shows the effectiveness of the framework.

The issue of distinguishing between the same-source and different-source hypotheses based on various types of traces is a generic problem in forensic science. This problem is often tackled with Bayesian approaches, which are able to provide a likelihood ratio that quantifies the relative strengths of evidence supporting each of the two competing hypotheses. Here, we focus on distance-based approaches, whose robustness and specifically whose capacity to deal with high-dimensional evidence are very different, and need to be evaluated and optimized. A unified framework for direct methods based on estimating the likelihoods of the distance between traces under each of the two competing hypotheses, and indirect methods using logistic regression to discriminate between same-source and different-source distance distributions, is presented. Whilst direct methods are more flexible, indirect methods are more robust and quite natural in machine learning. Moreover, indirect methods also enable the use of a vectorial distance, thus preventing the severe information loss suffered by scalar distance approaches.Direct and indirect methods are compared in terms of sensitivity, specificity and robustness, with and without dimensionality reduction, with and without feature selection, on the example of hand odor profiles, a novel and challenging type of evidence in the field of forensics. Empirical evaluations on a large panel of 534 subjects and their 1690 odor traces show the significant superiority of the indirect methods, especially without dimensionality reduction, be it with or without feature selection.

We question the current evaluation practice on diffusion-based purification methods. Diffusion-based purification methods aim to remove adversarial effects from an input data point at test time. The approach gains increasing attention as an alternative to adversarial training due to the disentangling between training and testing. Well-known white-box attacks are often employed to measure the robustness of the purification. However, it is unknown whether these attacks are the most effective for the diffusion-based purification since the attacks are often tailored for adversarial training. We analyze the current practices and provide a new guideline for measuring the robustness of purification methods against adversarial attacks. Based on our analysis, we further propose a new purification strategy showing competitive results against the state-of-the-art adversarial training approaches.

Graphs are important data representations for describing objects and their relationships, which appear in a wide diversity of real-world scenarios. As one of a critical problem in this area, graph generation considers learning the distributions of given graphs and generating more novel graphs. Owing to their wide range of applications, generative models for graphs, which have a rich history, however, are traditionally hand-crafted and only capable of modeling a few statistical properties of graphs. Recent advances in deep generative models for graph generation is an important step towards improving the fidelity of generated graphs and paves the way for new kinds of applications. This article provides an extensive overview of the literature in the field of deep generative models for graph generation. Firstly, the formal definition of deep generative models for the graph generation and the preliminary knowledge are provided. Secondly, taxonomies of deep generative models for both unconditional and conditional graph generation are proposed respectively; the existing works of each are compared and analyzed. After that, an overview of the evaluation metrics in this specific domain is provided. Finally, the applications that deep graph generation enables are summarized and five promising future research directions are highlighted.

Since the 1950s, machine translation (MT) has become one of the important tasks of AI and development, and has experienced several different periods and stages of development, including rule-based methods, statistical methods, and recently proposed neural network-based learning methods. Accompanying these staged leaps is the evaluation research and development of MT, especially the important role of evaluation methods in statistical translation and neural translation research. The evaluation task of MT is not only to evaluate the quality of machine translation, but also to give timely feedback to machine translation researchers on the problems existing in machine translation itself, how to improve and how to optimise. In some practical application fields, such as in the absence of reference translations, the quality estimation of machine translation plays an important role as an indicator to reveal the credibility of automatically translated target languages. This report mainly includes the following contents: a brief history of machine translation evaluation (MTE), the classification of research methods on MTE, and the the cutting-edge progress, including human evaluation, automatic evaluation, and evaluation of evaluation methods (meta-evaluation). Manual evaluation and automatic evaluation include reference-translation based and reference-translation independent participation; automatic evaluation methods include traditional n-gram string matching, models applying syntax and semantics, and deep learning models; evaluation of evaluation methods includes estimating the credibility of human evaluations, the reliability of the automatic evaluation, the reliability of the test set, etc. Advances in cutting-edge evaluation methods include task-based evaluation, using pre-trained language models based on big data, and lightweight optimisation models using distillation techniques.

北京阿比特科技有限公司